Stark wrote: » They really need to sort out mandatory hi-viz for houses.https://twitter.com/DubFireBrigade/status/1293466867928104961
kenmm wrote: » The whole time I lived in Dublin - it was always a bit of an amber gambler city. Last 5 years have been absolutely piss taking levels. I put it down to a combination of traffic massively increasing since the last recession and the cumulative effect (i.e. the slow decline until we reach the point where it is acceptable). I catch myself drifting into that mindset as well from time to time, which is a pain as when I drive int he UK (for example) need to be really mindful as they actually enforce red light jumping (with cameras and traffic police). EDIT: Its getting to the stage where in some places (Like the Becket bridge where there is a no left turn heading westbound from the convention centre) that its a red light jump + illegal move (i.e. red light for straight ahead, but cars sailing on ahead and illegally to the right). I got beeped the other day as I was walking across the road (on a green pedestrian).
magicbastarder wrote: » maybe the handbrake was left off the car and it rolled? though since the house was empty, someone may have abandoned a car there.
AndrewJRenko wrote: » FFS - Someone managed to REVERSE into a house?
Duckjob wrote: » What "incentive" do you need ? It's the law that you stop on amber unless it would be dangerous to do so. Having said that, if the worst that was happening was drivers scooting through on a slightly stale amber, we'd be laughing, but the situation is far, far, far, worse than that. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OWC8sT06Zi0
kenmm wrote: » EDIT: Its getting to the stage where in some places (Like the Becket bridge where there is a no left turn heading westbound from the convention centre) that its a red light jump + illegal move (i.e. red light for straight ahead, but cars sailing on ahead and illegally to the right). I got beeped the other day as I was walking across the road (on a green pedestrian).
07Lapierre wrote: » They should invent sensors that fit into the rear bumper of cars, that emit a hi pitched "Beep" noise if you reverse too close to an obstacle. Maybe fit cameras to the rear of the car? when reverse gear is engaged, a display on the dashboard would show the driver where/what they are reversing towards? :P failing that, they could just do what most cyclists do when we want to know whats going on behind us and just look over your shoulder??
breezy1985 wrote: » Going through a green Man like that takes a serious level of scumbaggery especially on busy Dublin streets
AndrewJRenko wrote: » Would it not have taken considerable force to embed into a brick wall? Or are Volvos that heavy and walls that flimsy these days?
breezy1985 wrote: » All I can see there is 4 firemen standing on front of a black screen
TaurenDruid wrote: » Empty house, possibly re-possessed by CAB, jeep reversed in? Yeah, I'm guessing there's more to this particular story than an Andy-level "Stoopid drivers are stoopid, hyuk hyuk hyuk"...
TaurenDruid wrote: » Has happened me too. I find stopping in front of the car, and loudly asking them what the problem is, and if they've forgotten their glasses, can be hilarious. (Oh, wait, I'm a motorist - am I not supposed to be 1000% pro-motorist and 5000% anti-cyclist, according to some here? Oops!)
07Lapierre wrote: » Well since we’re speculating... maybe the driver knew the house was empty and reversed into it as some kind of break in/ theft attempt? Either way... stupid is as stupid does!
Spook_ie wrote: » Well Jeeps on fire and Southside seem to occur more often than you'd think https://www.irishmirror.ie/news/irish-news/tallaght-fire-shocked-locals-watch-6382057
07Lapierre wrote: » The Jeep is not on the pavement and is very well “Lit up”! What’s the problem?
Spook_ie wrote: » Well according to some it needs HiViz as well as being lit up
07Lapierre wrote: » THIS is a cycle lane!https://twitter.com/dlrcc/status/1293468539366641666?s=21
07Lapierre wrote: » Not me... I’ve always said lights trump Hi-viz. or maybe your confusing Hi-viz with day glow?
AndrewJRenko wrote: » I've heard him enough times before thanks - all in favour of cycling, once it doesn't impinge on the customers of his insurance business at all - all against very basic safety measures like the 30kmph limit around the city.
Spook_ie wrote: » Just the theory
Stark wrote: » They really need to sort out mandatory hi-viz for houses.
SeanW wrote: » So, he's a cyclist, but not a "real" cyclist because he doesn't agree with you. Hmmm ...
breezy1985 wrote: » Amazing work. Off road level and path level is the only way to go. Anyone know what the junctions and on ramps looks like ?
07Lapierre wrote: » Looks like its Road level with raised Kerbstone's on each side?https://twitter.com/dlrcc/status/1293468539366641666/photo/3
magicbastarder wrote: » not that's it's really relevant, but i had to drive from park west to glasnevin at rush hour today. my own fault for not taking the M50. it was pretty much grand, but then phibsboro was a **** show. i probably drove at less than half walking pace from kings inn to hart's corner. i was the stupid schmuck not driving up the bus lane on the various sections where there is one along that stretch, and it probably would have halved my time. and i clearly wouldn't have been caught either. it's kinda funny, i almost don't blame other drivers for breaking the rules to suit themselves. rules aren't rules unless they're enforced. they're just ink.
Weepsie wrote: » Never mind amber gambling. Today at this junction I saw the following : I'm going straight ahead. Line up traffic beind me in both lanes. Car leaves the line, basically mounts path, takes the left filter lane, then cuts right, drives across the other lanes, and then takes the left filter lane across the road, drives on a bit, does a u-turn, and then takes the left filter again. It was the most criminally dangerous and careless thing I've probably ever seen, yet we have stupid f*cking threads like this that act like bikes are the source of all that are wrong on our roads. I wish I had my camera on.https://www.google.com/maps/@53.2763578,-6.3310801,3a,75y,5.26h,83.06t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sCRSgZOWICYi3mExH944z2w!2e0!7i16384!8i8192
TaurenDruid wrote: » Something something not all cyclists not all motorists something something not a homogeneous group.