LawStudent1234 wrote: » Can someone please tell me what question 6 was on?
rightytighty wrote: » Product Liability and Causation I went with anyway
law_struggles wrote: » Would you have gotten marks for talking about Nervous Shock for the question where he shocked the girl at work or is that completely wrong?
LawStudent1234 wrote: » Thank god! Thanks a mill! I didn’t go into the material contribution test etc but did talk on causation do you think that this was needed?
[Deleted User] wrote: » Well.. usual torture of exam post-mortem - how did people find tort? I thought the passing off q was lovely and defamation question ok. Really struggled to identify topics for Murr? My answer will give me nightmares!
rightytighty wrote: » I don’t know, I thought nervous shock was for witnesses of accidents and aftermaths etc so I went with duty of care, causation and remoteness, and damages for loss of earnings, medical expenses, and pain and suffering
rightytighty wrote: » I just briefly discussed multiple source/material increase in risk because it was undetermined whether the steering fault caused the crash
nmurphy1441 wrote: » I also went down the route of duty to warm and possible duty to recall a defective product! Oh god!
[Deleted User] wrote: » What did people advise for old man Murr in the Park?
HappyKitten62 wrote: » I used Liability for children then causation and remoteness
channing90 wrote: » What did people say for the question on the cigarette butts, I spoke about private nuisance and causation and wrote a paragraph on Rylands but said it didn’t apply dunno how right or wrong I was, anyone with a better understanding of it?
nmurphy1441 wrote: » Anyone do the limitations question and how did you go about it?
Lallers96 wrote: » Same phew! Also hey Defamation Again?! I mean, I'm glad I studied that but wow its practically a guaranteed Q now