Samuel T. Cogley wrote: » Yeah the problem with it being like Athlone, is being like Athlone.
saabsaab wrote: » Well Athlone has the water.
Samuel T. Cogley wrote: » Cut back on showers or live in Athlone... It's a tough one. :pac:
Montage of Feck wrote: » Well if they do, as a denizen of the wastelands outside the pale, I be taking a pee in the Shannon.
Rodney Bathgate wrote: » If anyone has seen the film Brewsters Millions then you know the solution. Tow an iceberg into Dublin Bay.
saabsaab wrote: » ... would it not make more sense to make a new urban development area near water and space i.e. Athlone or similar. This would reduce traffic housing shortages etc. etc.
El Tarangu wrote: » Which do you think would cost more: building a big pipe, or building 'Dublin-on-the-Shannon'?
saabsaab wrote: » Taking everything into account, over the long term, I'd say the new capital would cost less.
El Tarangu wrote: » Not sure that I agree with you; where would all these new jobs come from? Using much the same logic, the goverment could cancel the national broadband plan, and tell everyone to move to some town where they do have broadband
Hodors Appletart wrote: » with the advent of widespread WFH developing a place like Athlone seems a really good idea
LuasSimon wrote: » Dublin has taken all the jobs and young people from rural Ireland..might as well take the water as well!
saabsaab wrote: » From what I gather 50% of Dublins water is being lost! The system is unable to cope, little is being done to improve it and will lead to bursts even if Shannon water is pumped there.https://www.irishtimes.com/opinion/mains-supply-awash-with-leaks-behind-dublin-water-shortage-1.3561620
Darc19 wrote: » It's about 45% and includes "unaccounted" usage. The best in the world runs about 20% lost/ unaccounted water. But if we don't want to pay for it, we can't expect it to get much better
This is news again. As I said before it's a daft idea not only because Dublin is not sustainable as it is but 50% of the water is lost into the ground as is. What would happen to the Shannon water?
Better to develop a new capital around Athlone, more space, nearer everywhere and plenty of Shannon water.
A new capital just so a few people can have a cup of tea?
Sure. Barry's is mine, Ta. Seriously, it's much more than that. Traffic, crime, water employment housing all could be much improved.
That's old news, it's around 30% now.
Meanwhile peoples houses getting flooded in the winter time in the Shannon floodplains.
The plan to pipe it during the winter floods and lake-store it in Peamount to supply Dublin City, South Dublin, Dún Laoghaire–Rathdown, Fingal, Meath, Kildare, north Tipperary, Offaly, Laois, Westmeath, Meath and Wicklow was shunned.
They'd rather be flooded than supply another county. You just couldn't make it up and guess where they go with the begging bowl to clean up their flood mess?
Mad idea even without taking into account the massive environmental damage done in the construction and wildlife affected by the processing. Maybe they aren't serious?
I doubt that the flooding would be changed very much as for money it will come from the EU as is usual.
Importing water might not be a solution if thsi come true..
https://www.independent.ie/regionals/dublin/dublin-news/dublin-named-among-worlds-most-at-risk-cities-from-rising-sea-levels/a332893995.html
You are right absolutely no affect on flooding.
The flooding on the Shannon is caused by the topography of the river basin.