Gintonious wrote: » Must have read them a few times now, can't spot any sort of racism at all in either of them. Criticizing an anti-racism stance is therefore racist. Serious mental gymnastics going on there.
pjohnson wrote: » Theres a vocal cohort of Hamilton fans who use his race as a free pass for anything and if you disagree/criticise him at all you are racist. LiquidZeb has just shown that skill.
ruwithme wrote: » A six time formula 1 world champion, and not yet retired. What more is there to say.
ELM327 wrote: » Plenty to say. He's been gifted the records.
Faugheen wrote: » Beaten every team-mate he’s ever had, including three world champions.
ELM327 wrote: » What about Jenson over 3 years together?
tipp_tipp_tipp wrote: » Didn't Hamilton beat him 2 out of 3
Burkie1203 wrote: » Lewis says he feels awkward negotiating a new contract when so many job losses are going on. So drive for free then?
recyclebin wrote: » People seem to forget that Schumacher had Jean Todt, Ross Brawn and Rory Byrne behind him. Vettel had Adrian Newey at Red Bull. Great drivers always have a great team behind them.
Killinator wrote: » Senna liked to hop to teams he believed had the best car, he left McLaren cause the Williams was all powerful but then it got nerfed the year he joined. Why Hamilton is expected to drive the Alpha Romeo or Haas to prove himself I don't know. He wasn't some randomer McLaren picked up off the street for his first year, they obviously saw talent in him. Not to mention he joined Mercedes when they had won previously zilch at the time after returning
Gintonious wrote: » He joined them when they had gotten their requests honoured when it came to the massive rule changes in 2014, well timed.
Killinator wrote: » Even if he did and he knew they were in with a great chance of winning, it's not exactly unheard of for a driver to try and get to what they think is the best team. Neither Vettel or the God amongst men to some, Alonso, joined Ferrari thinking they be a **** show. They joined as they thought it would give them a shot at the title.Yet we're told Hamilton's titles mean less or don't count because his choice worked out and the other guys didn't. Rosberg drove a dominant Merc, why isn't his title questioned. Buttons Brawn was in a league of 2 for the first half of his title winning season . These drivers are used as a stick to beat Hamilton , but no one is saying their titles don't count or mean less because let's face it they are not in with a chance of breaking the great Schumi's 7....well is it really 7, can we count the titles he 'walked' or was 'gifted'. Maybe he's closer to 5. And Senna, maybe 2 if we discount the 'easy' ones
Killinator wrote: » Rosberg drove a dominant Merc, why isn't his title questioned.
Rodney Bathgate wrote: » Rosberg gets minimal credit for his title. None from Hamilton fans. They usually blame reliability. No mention of the many atrocious starts Hamilton made that season. Seeing Hamilton ‘race’ by backing the pack up to hinder Rosberg was hilarious though. A real ‘racer’.
nelly17 wrote: » For me I think its a shame Ferrari are not really at the races this year if you will excuse the pun, I genuinely think that if their car was better Le Clerk would be a:very compeditive or b: beating him. And actually showing Lewis to be good but not great or legendary and it would probably take him down a peg or two.
Killinator wrote: » Or maybe, just maybe, Lewis would/is a better driver.
Killinator wrote: » Or maybe, just maybe, Lewis would/is a better driver. Ifs and buts are fine but Hamilton has the trophies not Leclerc
namloc1980 wrote: » Leclerc is in a universally accepted rubbish car. He hasn't a hope of winning in it. Hamilton has been and is in the best car on the grid by a country mile. Fair play to him but winning in the Merc is much easier when compared to the crap Ferrari. Think about it this way - would Hamilton win the championship in the Ferrari?
Killinator wrote: » What has Leclerc done, actually done, that makes him a better driver?
