Fe1VanWilder wrote: » Has anybody been sent an exam number yet/any information about parking/the exact location of the exam hall in the RDS? Or is it expected to be out this week?
DFMCD190384 wrote: » Nothing yet. �� Quick question also, can we highlight sections of our Blackstones ?
Lallers96 wrote: » Anyone else have the nerves settling in? We've a week to study (not including the morning of the exam), and for a lot of people we'll be travelling the day before it too - so really 6 proper days left of study. I feel like it's all surface level knowledge in my head, and I'm failing to remember cases, but not the handful of statutes, when answering past questions blind. I had a load of essay questions prepared that I intended to learn off but they included a total of 45 cases and my brain can't remember them all. And it seems in a lot of problem q sample answers that less cases are required - is that incorrect? Anyway, I'm beginning to get nervous as I haven't sat a law exam since May 2019 and I haven't sat Tort since May 2016 in first year. I'm almost thinking that answering 5 Qs in 3 hours is very hard so I've begun just timing myself for 30 mins to answer as much as I can and finish the Q on the buzzer, and then mark myself. All my answers seem very "surface-level" like without the expected analysis or "exploring the full potential of the question" that the examiner report wants, but then again I've been told that answering 5 Qs quite well rather than 4 brilliantly is better. *Sigh* I hate the stress of this
iamanengine wrote: » Competition - State Aid came up last time so I'm hoping we will get a straight up Competition Q, Art 101 /102
Louis Litt wrote: » EU In Judicial Review, on standing for a Regulatory Act, i.e non legislative - how do i differenciate between a legislative act and non in a problem Q? Are all Directives, REgulations and Decisions legislative acts?
DUMSURFER wrote: » Question about EU - Direct Effect & MS Liability Does anyone have anything on the role of damages as a remedy where there has been a breach of EU law, either by the individual or by the State? He mentions it in one of the reports and cites Von Colson and Factortame as the cases to use but I only have a bit on Von Colson regarding indirect effect. Any help greatly appreciated!
hollyb98 wrote: » I have Van Colson only in relation to Indirect Effect, but Factortame is used as a three tier test by the ECJ for Member State Liability, I have here that the case builds on the test originally set out by Francovich and basically says that for breach amounting to MS liability must be 'sufficiently serious' and there's a few cases then establishing what sufficiently serious means, I don't know if that is much help?
DUMSURFER wrote: » Yeah I have cases to illustrate that point on 'sufficiently serious' but he particularly mentions those cases in relation to the "role of damages as a remedy" which strikes me as weird. The part of the question that bit is referring to is just about whether the State is liable for damages and between what time period, so really I'd just answer it away no problem but the fact he mentions the role of damages in relation to those two cases and then goes on to say 'it should include an examination on MS Liability w/Francovich, Sutton, Factortame etc... Just threw me off a bit and just feel like he's looking for a different point to what I have.
iamanengine wrote: » Yeah I think all regs, directives and decisions are. A non-legislative act would be either a delegated act or an implementing act. A legislative act is adopted by the Council and Parliament together whereas a non-legislative act will be adopted by the Commission based on a power given to it under a legislative act, these fill in the details missing from the main legislative act. Simple enough :rolleyes:
Lcork23 wrote: » What do people think about article 30 and 110 coming up for the August exam? Art 34 seems easier though so hoping it is that!
rightytighty wrote: » UCC/ESB is only in my notes for nuisance, is that correct?
Lawabc wrote: » Dublin sitting in Croke Park
nmurphy1441 wrote: » In need of two specific EU essay sample answers if anyone can help me out... they come up quite regularly! The principle of equivalence (pelati question) and the non privileged applicants judicial review question! Or any insight would be greatly appreciated
iamanengine wrote: » Do you have the sitting they came up? I might be able to fish one out
lawFE1s19976 wrote: » Has anyone received their letter today? A little bit worried with how late they're leaving it
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://w1.vanillicon.com/v2/1c2638d40c8423fc1a2b2b1a2a01a3b9.svg)
