riclad wrote: » What I find strange is people who live in houses or ground floor apartments who leave the curtains open. Do they not care who see, s them. Are they oblivious, do they like looking at passers by. I think when you over a certain height it does, nt matter if the curtains are open. The way apartments are designed most bedrooms have small windows not facing other buildings. If the curtains are open you can see into the front room, kitchen area. I don't understand people who leave curtains open at night when the lights are on. I think if you live close to your neighbours it's just better to close the curtains.
Seamai wrote: » "No nets, how common" Lynda la Hughes (Gimme, Gimme, Gimme)
mrsdewinter wrote: » Unpopular opinion: I wish net curtains would make a comeback.
A Tyrant Named Miltiades! wrote: » It's one thing wandering around in the nip when you live in the countryside, but I've likely seen more of my neighbours' anatomy than their own GP. I'm not suggesting anything drastic like net curtains, but can't people at least draw the curtains when the lights come on?
ILoveYourVibes wrote: » I do hope people know that even with net curtains during the day ...with no light on ..we can see you. Its only in the dark we can't.
Sardonicat wrote: » You've got good eyesight.
global23214124 wrote: » And now to ride Mrs O'Reilly
frosty123 wrote: » The Dutch do that all the time, lived in Holland for a spell...could write a book about what I saw everything from drug taking, yoga, domestic violence to a couple having sex, I kid you not
Chalk McHugh wrote: » Once your neighbour wasn't having sex with a chicken and giving new meaning to him enjoying a Sunday Roast (which i saw was a thread on here) whats the big deal?
Yellow_Fern wrote: » Has anyone tried that one way reflective film for windows? Would it look weird in a front room?
A Tyrant Named Miltiades! wrote: » . Even for zoo animals, when their enclosures are designed, are built in a way that allows the animal some privacy from prying eyes. Apparently they go a bit crazy without a hiding place.
Gruffalox wrote: » Not quite the no curtains dilemma, but I do not get the amount of houses built in the country - big fancy yokes - with an acre of lawn around them and not a bush or tree or wall or bit of bamboo screening to be found. It is like an open stage, every single time you leave the house you are on show to passing traffic. It honestly baffles me. Traditionally people would build up attractive woodlands or shrubberies or walls to give themselves privacy, but so many seem to go to the absolute opposite extreme. What is the point of having a garden or a home if you cannot be private and relaxed in it?
A Tyrant Named Miltiades! wrote: » I completely agree. My sister built her house on the farm at home, behind a grove, and at the housewarming a few of the Dublin visitors were all "what's the point in building a house that nobody can see?". Strange mentality, a house is a sanctuary, not a display item.
CrankyHaus wrote: » I actually never copped that this was done deliberately to show off the house. "Look on my works ye mighty and despair" doesn't exactly come to mine when you're looking at an unpainted concrete yoke. I assumed it was pure laziness.
A Tyrant Named Miltiades! wrote: » It might be laziness in some cases, but looking at some of the new MacMansions down home, a lot of them have hired landscaping but have (seemingly deliberately) avoided anything that obstructs the house. Annoyingly, they're all built to the same paint-by-numbers design, so they're not even adding anything to the architecture of the area. Once you've seen one of these concrete & PVC piles, you've seen them all.
Deleted User wrote: » Lived on an estate years ago. The boyfriend of the woman opposite used to “come home for lunch” and then proceed to have very enthusiastic and energetic (not to say athletic) sex with her in the front room; no blinds, curtains, net curtains or, as far as we could see, any other precautions. We took to holding up the sort of scorecards you see on Olympic skating competitions or Dancing with the Staff programmes, which he could see as he scuttled (well, limped, mostly) back to work at 1.55pm. I think the highest score I ever gave was 9.5 - just couldn’t bring myself to give him a ten, even though it looked like he had “given her a ten”, on a couple of occasions*! Maybe you could try this approach?? * no, I’m not jealous. Not jealous at all, OK??
EmmetSpiceland wrote: » I would have assumed the “clearing” of the front area around the house was to provide the owners with a nice view of the countryside without, the downside being the general public getting a nice view of within.