ExMachina1000 wrote: » Agreed. The guardian shouldn't be read by anyone
ExMachina1000 wrote: » I had a look on Reuters under the Trump headline. I got this.https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-immigration-trump/trump-to-propose-plan-to-make-u-s-immigration-more-merit-based-idUSKCN1SL2CX Unrelated to the Twitter story but a great idea none the less. Similar to Australia and soon to be UK system. Also an article about trump announcing he will ban tik toc. It's a short video sight for children and young people.
Overheal wrote: » Indeed unrelated to what we’ve been discussing for the past page.
ExMachina1000 wrote: » Is relevant to the election. It's a part of his plan.
ExMachina1000 wrote: » Not really. Stop trying to force your ideas and beliefs. I'm not interested in reading the guardian. I have repeated this numerous times. You have no right
Timberrrrrrrr wrote: » He really is mad that a grandmother was able to use TikTok to ruin his little rally
Kidchameleon wrote: » Not even remotely funny and 100% cringe inducing
pjohnson wrote: » Do you not agree with what she says? Why not?
Kidchameleon wrote: » I'm not sure she's "saying" anything? She is just mimicking the president as far as I can tell
Overheal wrote: » So you’re saying what he says is cringeworthy? I mean I agree, like this, is incredibly cringeworthy:https://twitter.com/projectlincoln/status/1289621395530448902?s=21
Ten of Swords wrote: » Can we move on from arguing about what links are good and what are not ExMachina1000 you have mentioned your disdain for the guardian several times, the point has been made at this stage
Kidchameleon wrote: » She's a typical female comedian IMHO - unwilling to take risks. She plays it safe by cashing in on the orange man fad. But humor is subjective, feel free to enjoy her jokes if you like.
Overheal wrote: » So it’s misogyny now?
ExMachina1000 wrote: » Iv yet to hear of a funny female comedian. I could be wrong though. There might be one out there.
Timberrrrrrrr wrote: » Edgy :rolleyes: