The key elements include six high speed charging hubs on motorways capable of charging eight vehicles simultaneously; 16 high speed charging hubs capable of charging four vehicles simultaneously; additional high power chargers at 34 current 50 kW locations; upgrading over 50 22 kW chargers to 50 kW, and replacing up to 264 locations with 528 charge points at the pre-existing pilot grade of 22 kW to next generation high reliability models.
liamog wrote: » I see the right units all the way down on the Android app
KCross wrote: » Looks correct to me too on iOS. Maybe there is an example somewhere on some charge point where someone typed it wrong.
unkel wrote: Ambition 2/10 Competence 5/10 Vision 1/10
MJohnston wrote: » Throw a small roof box into the mix and we could easily handle a second child.
DrPhilG wrote: » Just a heads up, there are probably insurance and human rights implications if you transport your second child in a roof box.
MJohnston wrote: » What they don't know won't hurt them...
MJohnston wrote: » How else am I supposed to get them in there in the first place??
Efitz2019 wrote: » Sorry if this is in the wrong thread. Anyone ever experienced this issue with fast chargers. I pulled in with over 40% battery left charged for 27mins. It says I took 31.7kwh! I drive a classic Hyundai Ioniq. Rang ecars they are looking into it for me. The girl says she has never seen this happen. I think it has just doubled the amount I actually took and billed me for it. Ever happened to anyone else?
unkel wrote: » The max your Ioniq can take in theory from a CCS charger is about 26kWh! So yes it looks like you got half what you paid for and you charged all the way up to 94% with lots of throttling at the end that would explain why your charge was relatively slow Let us know what ecars come back to you with.
Deleted User wrote: » I'd like to see charge time for the Ioniq on the newer 150 Kw chargers, save 5-10 mins maybe ?
Black_Knight wrote: » Rough example of adding 50% charge up to 80%. 14kWh, at a rate of about 46kW/hr on the 50kW chargers, vs about 68kW/hr on the 150kW charger.@46kW/hr that's 18 minutes to get 14kWh of charge@68kW/hr that's 12 minutes to get 14kWh of charge.
Black_Knight wrote: » Rough example of adding 50% charge up to 80%. 14kWh, at a rate of about 46kW/hr 46kWh/hr on the 50kW chargers, vs about 68kW/hr 68kWh/hr on the 150kW charger.@46kWh/hr that's 18 minutes to get 14kWh of charge@68kWh/hr that's 12 minutes to get 14kWh of charge.
Kramer wrote: » You missed out on a few small "h" - I fixed it for you :pac:.
ELM327 wrote: » the h in the numerator cancels the h in the denominator
innrain wrote: » Next AC unit flagged to be replaced Adare. It seems something like one per week although I haven't heard anything from Clifden.
ELM327 wrote: » Is there a list of all planned AC to 44kWDC conversions ?
innrain wrote: » I didn't see a list. It appears on their map that is scheduled for replacement. They didn't do this when the were replacing ACs old with new so it must be the Zoe upgrades. I could be wrong though. I'm checking the map at random times to build statistics about the usage of different chargers. Unfortunately the ecars usage data doesn't have a y axis so you can't compare one charger from another. I'm missing cpinfo.ie when planning trips. Damn single point of failure.
Black_Knight wrote: » Dublin port - Complete Kells - Complete Cavan - Complete Drogheda - Complete Sligo - Complete Tullamore Killkenny city 2 locations in Galway City Clifden Kenmare Athlone Waterford City - Complete Dublin City Odd, Clonmel wasn't listed, but was done. Similar story with Adare. This info was all only released to IEVOA about a month ago, so odd they've gone off plan already.
innrain wrote: » Tullamore is completed as well
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://wc.vanillicon.com/v2/c35d4ce8a12792ca13fb381f4727ac6f.svg)
