Trump questions why Fauci has better ratings as U.S. approaches 150,000 coronavirus deaths As the number of Americans who have died of the novel coronavirus approached 150,000 on Tuesday, President Trump questioned why he isn’t as popular as Anthony S. Fauci, the nation’s top infectious-disease expert. “He’s got this high approval rating,” Trump told reporters at a White House coronavirus task force briefing, claiming that he had implemented many of Fauci’s recommendations. “So why don’t I have a high approval rating?” Fauci, meanwhile, warned that even while the outbreak in the Sun Belt might finally be leveling off, the number of positive tests were rising in the Midwest. “We just can’t afford, yet again, another surge,” he said Tuesday, as the United States reported more than 1,000 coronavirus fatalities for the second day in a row. Florida, Arkansas, Oregon and Montana, in particular, witnessed their highest single-day death tolls to date. More than 59,500 new cases were tallied nationwide, bringing the total count of infections reported since February to at least 4,331,000.
Overheal wrote: » Washington Post running with that too
Overheal wrote: » https://www.mediaite.com/trump/trump-reveals-he-didnt-raise-bounties-in-call-with-putin-before-dismissing-it-as-fake-news/ Trump finally let the cat out of the bag, admitting that the topic of Russian bounties has never been discussed with Putin.
Leroy42 wrote: » That, frankly, is an abdication of his responsibilities as CiC. All military should be up in arms about this (not literally!). To not even bring it up, to dismiss it as fake news, not because the security service has said so, or a military investigation has shown it to be, but because a few random people mentioned that they thought it was, is gross incompetence. Either he doesn't care, he is scared of Putin or he really does believe it to be fake. The 1st two are pretty terrifying for a US POV, the third needs more explanation that 'some people are saying' and goes to heart of the US intelligence aparatus. Given that he already sided with Russia os the security services over Russin interference, is Trump really saying that he places no credibility on what the security services are reporting?
homes_for_all wrote: » It's funny seeing the Steele dossier being pulled apart. So it was mainly sourced by a law student in Russia and US (Igor Danchenko), with no significant ties to Kremlin and "was never meant to go public" let alone form the basis of Muller's investigation. What is it with British intelligence dossiers being done by students?!
Quin_Dub wrote: » https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1288509572223651840 Words actually fail me here. Does he really think that this will win him votes?
Overheal wrote: » I for one am genuinely shocked the poster boy for housing discrimination, who was sued for refusing to rent to black people, would take such a move. Shocked!
Pa ElGrande wrote: » The Democrats invited Mr. Barr to a hearing where he was the guest and yet would not let him speak, in doing so they demonstrated bad manners and bad faith and their antics were a really poor show.
Pa ElGrande wrote: » Your Trump derangement syndrome is getting boring. The Democrats invited Mr. Barr to a hearing where he was the guest and yet would not let him speak, in doing so they demonstrated bad manners and bad faith and their antics were a really poor show. They also used the same tactic against Michael Shellenberger. At this rate United States President Trump has the re-election all sown up it will be a blow out election in his favour on a par with 1972 for Nixon and with that I claim back the balance of my time.
Pa ElGrande wrote: » Your Trump derangement syndrome
extra gravy wrote: » "People who invoke TDS tend to be gleefully disparaging the other coalition. But if they are right to any degree, they are implicitly conceding a damning indictment of Trump. And it doesn’t even matter whether he is right or wrong. Good leaders inspire mutually beneficial cooperation, not derangement! Americans who value leadership, comity, and collaboration during a crisis should elect someone less polarizing––and practically any other choice would be less polarizing––because Trump cannot unite."https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2020/04/the-implications-of-trump-derangement-syndrome/610705/
Pa ElGrande wrote: » Your Trump derangement syndrome is getting boring. Something something......
Pa ElGrande wrote: » At this rate United States President Trump has the re-election all sown up it will be a blow out election in his favour on a par with 1972 for Nixon and with that I claim back the balance of my time.
osarusan wrote: » Jaysus. I'm not convinced that the polls are all that accurate, but the idea that Trump will win 49/50 states, or will win the popular vote by 18 million votes, is laughable.