Beechwoodspark wrote: » Now is a good time to introduce a green levy on the carriers, the airport and the consumers.suggest 8% moving to 10% next year
donkey balls wrote: » And what would we do with the monies from this levy?
gral6 wrote: » No one is forcing you to fly, stay home and save lives
gral6 wrote: » ****ing FF! They are killing Irish aviation industry !
Beechwoodspark wrote: » Invest in the future - carbon neutral aviation
donkey balls wrote: » I know this is aviation and not politics but to call Kenny and a good leader is questionable, Kenny was an accidental leader just happened to be in the right place and time etc. As for Leo he is another mouth piece had him knock on my door during the 2011 elections, At the time the governments wanted to sell off all state assets. I asked him why he wanted to sell off the ESB and did he know the critical work done here in Ireland and throughout the world with ESBI, Lets just say his minder had to drag him away. People have to remember the majority of TD/Ministers have never worked shift hours or in an actual job, The only time they see an airport is when flying off on junkets or holidays. There is one crowd they listen too and that's all these FDI companies scattered throughout Ireland, Remember the majority of these companies need cargo and pax access if that is limited or cut off all together there be calls left right and center.
[Deleted User] wrote: » This poster is a Troll. Don't feed them.
Beechwoodspark wrote: » Hap I’m not a troll I have some issues with FR yes
L1011 wrote: » You meet my definition of a troll on this thread. Taxation and carbon are entirely off topic, as it is basically every time you try to shoehorn them in. Stop it.
Beechwoodspark wrote: » Ok. Won’t mention them again on this thread.
Widdensushi wrote: » It's easy say right place etc as it ran smoothly, give some credit as he was the reason it appeared so, costcutting measures etc were widespread and Alot of difficult yet vital decisions were made. As for selling off the esb, state bodies prove time and time again to be a waste of taxpayers money, better for to be privately owned and allow competition
kevinandrew wrote: » The committee was infuriating viewing at times, the "Shannon lobby" in particular would have you believe there's a conspiracy against poor auld Shannon. One TD asking why Aer Lingus didn't minibus Shannon crew up and down to Dublin to keep them employed! Both Eddie Wilson and Sean Doyle were united on pretty much every point; the need for testing, the lack of support for the industry and Ireland's continued outlier position on regarding travel and tourism.
Jack1985 wrote: » Very relevant to this thread. It's a pity we don't have this balance in view within NPHET, in Government or within any of the opposition. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=enwiyKAhSic
Avoation1091 wrote: » Interesting this- The Irish Govt are doing there own thing. Agreed with Sean Doyle and Eddie Wilson yesterday. We need the connectivity to the island or this will have an effect long term. There were cases related to Travel a few weeks ago and that hasnt caused a massive spike. Theres a North-South discussion on Friday and Travels included. Hopefully they can knock some senses into the Govt. We are being left behind while the rest of Europe and the UK get air travel going again. Hopefully all the connections into DUB can be restored.
Deleted User wrote: » It’s hard to tell what the government policy is. It very much seems to be responding to public opinion in my eyes. People singing and shoulder to shoulder in pubs in March-pubs closed. Twitter posts of packed streets in Dublin-Pubs heavy monitoring by Gardai. Politicians comment on Dubs going to beaches in their counties-beaches closed and Garda checkpoints Social media commentary on flights coming in from Dallas......... When it comes to aviation it seems to be getting unfairly blamed for everything without any real factual support for some moves. Limited to no real solutions to a reopening of services. I imagine the lack of talk and solutions to testing at airports comes down to resources and cost, mostly cost. The lack of laws on quarantining and follow up Checks comes down to resources and again cost. It is far cheaper in the short term to keep the doors closed. It will take an awful lot pushing to change their mindset.
kona wrote: » From a government point of view, they want the money paid in their various social welfare supports to stay in the country as much as possible, which i can understand completely, the country is heading into a period of turmoil probably never seen before. I just cannot see a single reason why aviation should get back up to anything like last year beyond necessary cargo and trade links. Its grim, and I dont expect much improvement until maybe the start of next summer.
Deleted User wrote: » https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/science/coronavirus-vaccine-tracker.html It isn't all doom and gloom.
Deleted User wrote: » some of them are at stage 3 testing which is near release if all goes well. we are a long way removed from "abandon all hope".
Deleted User wrote: » I don’t disagree. I suspect if they voice that everyone will come running at them with their hand out.
kona wrote: » Do you think the first wave of vaccines are going to be affordable
The price Moderna is seeking is not likely to be final. In a range of about $50 to $60 for a course — that is, $25-$30 per dose — it appears to be higher than that agreed by Pfizer and its German partner BioNTech last week in a pre-order deal with the US government at $19.50 per dose. AstraZeneca, meanwhile, signed a deal for its potential vaccine with the Netherlands, Germany, France and Italy, which worked out to $3 to 4 per dose, according to calculations by Geoffrey Porges, a pharma and biotech analyst at SVB Leerink.