kjl wrote: » Exactly, all adults. Drug gangs don't care who they sell to and that included underage users. I reckon a 10 year old could buy weed if they wanted to. Legalisation and regulation would stop underage sales as well.
Tony EH wrote: » This is pure fantasy. The legalisation crowd always try and pass this off as a given. But legalising this won't get rid of criminal sales. The criminals will just undercut the regulated price and you can guarantee that that regulated price will keep going up and up with every budget passed, just like tobacco. The criminals aren't just going to go away, if dope is legalised.
Strumms wrote: » I can see the value of it, if it’s medicinal, and doctors can prescribe it and you can buy it from a pharmacy. For simply for recreation, no. We have enough trouble in the country with a legal recreational drug (alcohol), without adding cannabis into the mix. The fallout from doing that would simply cost the state too much revenue.
AudreyHepburn wrote: » Medicinal cannabis should absolutely be legal - this shouldn’t even be up for debate. Legalising it for recreational use though.... drugs are not for me and I make no apologies for that but if it can be done using the Dutch model then I wouldn’t have a problem with it. It would need to be properly regulated.
JohnnyFlash wrote: » There’s very little quality research to show medicinal cannabis is an effective drug for the huge range of disorders and conditions it’s being touted as a miracle for. Even then it would come in tablet/shot form, and not a big bag of Lucifer’s Lettuce.
Princess Consuela Bananahammock wrote: » Depends on what you mean by "effective drug." It's not (to the best of my knowledge) cure anything but it has been known to alleviate pain. And at that point, it depends on the person in pain and their personal experience.
kjl wrote: » I have already addressed this, it is maybe 1 in 20,000 people who suffer from weed psychosis, how many people in this country are full blown alcoholics. How many people have died from both alcohol poisoning and from the unhealthy lifestyle caused by alcoholism? People can still get their hands on weed. Anyone can go out today and buy it relatively easy. Having it be illegal does not change if people have issues with it. I don't think this small minority should dictate the rules for everyone else. Not only are we missing tax revenue, but we are also propping up drug gangs with an easy source of income. Drug gangs by the way who won't care if the person they are selling it to is displaying psychotic behaviour. Drug gangs who don't care if people get sick from altered cannabis, remember a few years ago people were spraying cannabis plants with some crystal ****. That wouldn't happen under a regulated market.
c.p.w.g.w wrote: » I have a buddy, who doesn't consume alcohol because his a horrible drunk... Friday evening after work, he gets high on whatever drug takes his mood, and he gets grief from family and some friends...lots of rubbish about it ruining his life etc etc... He earns €80k ish a year and now owns his house outright...yeah his life is ruining ruined by taking magic mushrooms and cannabis 1 or 2's a week...but a bottle of wine a night is perfectly normal, sure the french and Italians do that :rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:
Wanderer78 wrote: » illegal drugs are obviously not harm free, you d never know with them
c.p.w.g.w wrote: » How much do the AGS spend a year on Drug related crime? If that money could be spent on social issues and mental health services we would be much better of place as a whole...oh and add in the tax from cannabis sales too
snotboogie wrote: » Not sure on that. In Canada, where the black market persisted after legalization, the black market prices are about a quarter of what they are here. Im sure that is aided by the climate there which makes growing in bulk outdoors extremely cheap and easy.
the purple tin wrote: » It is a political hot potato. I don't think any of the main parties would want to put it forward and risk losing votes.
jimmycrackcorm wrote: » Over the last few decade a lot of effort has gone into trying to reducing tobacco use. Now people want to encourage smoking agin but with cannabis?
Tony EH wrote: » Canada is an outlier in many areas and no country can be really used as a universal benchmark at the end of the day. But, consider this. Criminals make millions selling illegal cigarettes on the streets of Ireland, even though they're available in every newsagents on every street corner and they're "taxed" and "regulated". I see no reason why they wouldn't continue their illegal selling for dope either. Plus, in Amsterdam, the criminal element never disappeared and there's a thriving black market for drugs there. I just don't buy this idea that criminal gangs will just give up and disappear, if dope became legal. It isn't going happen. But it always seems to get touted as a given by the pro legalisation crowd. My needle isn't buried on this either way, but the pungent smell of what's around today suggests a far different thing than when I used to puff away when I was younger. making me somewhat reluctant to come down on the legalise it side of things. But I think in any conversation to do with this, it's better to talk straight, than to indulge in fantasy scenarios about how "wonderful" everything would be.
snotboogie wrote: » 20% illegal is a lot better than 100% illegal.
Wanderer78 wrote: » the legalise campaign does need to realise though, legislation wont solve all drug related issues, and in fact would introduce some of its own
ReginaldSmythV wrote: » Well enough to be growing the **** though. Bottom line: it’s illegal.