IRE60 wrote: » FF's young lad - just been released after doing his stint for the bonfire incident (which I think was a manslaughter plea)
ballsdeep69 wrote: » Know it's old news, but who is this artical referring to ? https://m.herald.ie/news/suspect-in-bonfire-murder-also-linked-to-fatal-rave-knife-attack-35196680.html
Paul Rich Hairpiece wrote: » I must have missed that. His posts I saw said it was supposed to be the brother and over a debt.
P.Walnuts wrote: » Fits with what a certain Lord was posting here though
Donald Trump wrote: » Were you his primary school teacher?
Smallpaulwall wrote: » Yeah it's the terrible grammar and a few other clues on the page that has me fairly sure it's the Monk.
Paul Rich Hairpiece wrote: » Papers speculating that it was a case of getting your retaliation in first, as victim was home to deal with a 25 year old local criminal who assaulted a female known to the victim.https://m.herald.ie/news/murder-victim-shot-8-times-on-mothers-doorstep-recently-returned-to-dublin-39403042.html Probably complete crap.
Haladmirer wrote: » Charges will follow in that kmw case Maybe not murder but serious charges and the book will be thrown at them Think Gilligan getting 20 years for hash Gilligan got 20 years for vg
Haladmirer wrote: » First shooting in months lads Any more info Who ordered it? Hardly either bro a target when 1 off doing own thing in England If over a big bill k owed it has to be ddod who ordered it?? Family usually don't kill tho dd isn't bloodthirsty either
luke9311 wrote: » don’t think the case of kmw will ever go to court sad reality for the family not to get justice but without a torso it’s hard to solve and probably hidden well
luke9311 wrote: » Don’t think regency will go to court again specially after the key detective involved in solving the case is now dead. Also don’t think the case of kmw will ever go to court sad reality for the family not to get justice but without a torso it’s hard to solve and probably hidden well
judaspig wrote: » The whistleblower has just misspelled prostitute in the most hilarious fashion, it has to be in purpose
Frankx wrote: » There's a lesson here after this feud They brought too much heat on themselves with the onslaught Does any really think the regency will ever go to court again?,
Righteouswrong wrote: » Any background on the shooting today?
MickyPearse wrote: » That was the inital assumption.DK was paranoid that it was the pengiun last year. Made loads of fake accounts calling him out. That was before mad vicky got involved and was trying to pin it on Padraig o'Reilly haha
Don Logan wrote: » To just picture the monk sitting down putting up tweets with emojis makes me laugh out loud to be honest
Eyes1 wrote: » Don’t think it’s the monk at all. Always heard it was the sister of someone v close to him in the NIC. Maybe prompted to write certain things by another / others.
Smallpaulwall wrote: » Yeah it's the terrible grammar and a few other clues on the page that has me fairly sure it's the Monk. He follows lots of boxing reporters and boxers and we're not talking huge stars like 99% of people wouldn't even have heard of these.. unless your a huge boxing fan
Smallpaulwall wrote: » prostechute not your regular Brazzer she arrives by parachute worth every penny tbh
MTKcleaners wrote: » So said to much, or not enough, cannot be that pro of a hit if it is already known who did it.
john boye wrote: » Went and looked it up there and laughed out loud at it. Interestingly, he spelt it the same way (or very similarly) a few months ago. Might be relevant if people suspect it's a different person behind the account now.
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://wc.vanillicon.com/v2/ca212d7aa83e17c99222f5ef3ea72186.svg)
