nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Child Item

Gangland Shootings part 3 - Read OP before posting - updated 27/12/23

Beasty

Please remain civil to each other

No naming of suspects if not already published via reliable source. Initials are also not acceptable

Do not speculate over guilt of individuals

Once someone is charged any discussion over the circumstances resulting in the charge is not permitted

No posting or linking to graphic images of violent crime

Do not provide any information here that may prejudice legal/criminal proceedings

Please take care when posting any sensitive information

Do not question moderation in-thread. PM the mods if you have a question about moderation. Do not call out other posters in-thread. If you have a problem with a post or poster report it and leave the modding to the mods

Most of you know how the previous thread was modded. Anyone coming onto this thread thinking forum and site rules do not apply to them will find posting privileges removed. Do not re-register to evade any bans as to do so is an automatic siteban

Find more posts tagged with

Quick Links

Comments

Munstergirl854

So whats the likelihood of retaliation for this,if any??

Smallpaulwall

Munstergirl854 wrote: »

So whats the likelihood of retaliation for this,if any??

50% chance of retaliation, 50% chance of no retaliation

Munstergirl854

Smallpaulwall wrote: »

50% chance of retaliation, 50% chance of no retaliation

Keep this up and the resident statistician will be getting a visit from a faux courier.
100%.

Mrlouth

See Ian Huntley got cut up to bits and his gouged out happy Monday

MelvinWagstaff

Mrlouth wrote: »

See Ian Huntley got cut up to bits and his gouged out happy Monday

Is there a news article for this? Google search of his name provides nothing recent.

ohnonotgmail

Mrlouth wrote: »

See Ian Huntley got cut up to bits and his gouged out happy Monday

did you read that in a 10 year old article?

fierygrain

I think you're right, it's an oldie, and he doesn't have the Rona either.

entertainmentdaily.co.uk/news/where-ian-huntley-now-coronavirus/

Mrlouth

I’ve a screenshot won’t send

Cazale

Love the way people know the victim, who had him shot, the identity of the hitman and how the shooting will affect gangland in Dublin within ten minutes of the news breaking.

Ash.J.Williams

whodafunk wrote: »

Sleveless top - tattoos over shoulders of one arm. Would it have been him?

fap fap fap

MTKcleaners

WOC been in action in Dublin.

https://www.irishmirror.ie/news/irish-news/person-leaves-brilliant-sign-after-22419237

corner of hells

Smallpaulwall wrote: »

Theres a chance it could have been him, it either was or it wasn't so if I was to guess 50% chance it was him hope this clears this up

Did you , by chance read what you posted ?

MTKcleaners

Lord_Slong wrote: »

They did get the wrong man, but it was either or, and they didn't care who they got as long as the got one of them. I've already heard who did, it all makes sense.

So said to much, or not enough, cannot be that pro of a hit if it is already known who did it.

[Deleted User]

MTKcleaners wrote: »

So said to much, or not enough, cannot be that pro of a hit if it is already known who did it.

It's an elite hitman, who got the wrong person and who's identity was known within minutes by random board ****posters. What's hard to understand about that?

judaspig

The whistleblower has just misspelled prostitute in the most hilarious fashion, it has to be in purpose

bobmalooka

judaspig wrote: »

The whistleblower has just misspelled prostitute in the most hilarious fashion, it has to be in purpose

Is the whistleblower on Twitter? Would you have a link please?

[Deleted User]

bobmalooka wrote: »

Is the whistleblower on Twitter? Would you have a link please?

https://twitter.com/Cancer42198753/status/1287817046538031110

Gadgetman496

bobmalooka wrote: »

Is the whistleblower on Twitter? Would you have a link please?

https://twitter.com/cancer42198753?lang=en

john boye

judaspig wrote: »

The whistleblower has just misspelled prostitute in the most hilarious fashion, it has to be in purpose

Went and looked it up there and laughed out loud at it. Interestingly, he spelt it the same way (or very similarly) a few months ago. Might be relevant if people suspect it's a different person behind the account now.

Smallpaulwall

judaspig wrote: »

The whistleblower has just misspelled prostitute in the most hilarious fashion, it has to be in purpose

Yeah it's the terrible grammar and a few other clues on the page that has me fairly sure it's the Monk.

He follows lots of boxing reporters and boxers and we're not talking huge stars like 99% of people wouldn't even have heard of these.. unless your a huge boxing fan

jackrussel

john boye wrote: »

Went and looked it up there and laughed out loud at it. Interestingly, he spelt it the same way (or very similarly) a few months ago. Might be relevant if people suspect it's a different person behind the account now.

If you look at the tweets they sent out a day or two ago, whoever sent them knew how to spell or had autocorrect turned on. Reverted to type again

Lord_Slong

MTKcleaners wrote: »

So said to much, or not enough, cannot be that pro of a hit if it is already known who did it.

The target was either brother

Smallpaulwall

judaspig wrote: »

The whistleblower has just misspelled prostitute in the most hilarious fashion, it has to be in purpose

prostechute not your regular Brazzer she arrives by parachute worth every penny tbh

[Deleted User]

Smallpaulwall wrote: »

prostechute not your regular Brazzer she arrives by parachute worth every penny tbh

She goes so fast she needs a parachute to slow her down

Righteouswrong

Any background on the shooting today?

Don Logan

Smallpaulwall wrote: »

Yeah it's the terrible grammar and a few other clues on the page that has me fairly sure it's the Monk.

He follows lots of boxing reporters and boxers and we're not talking huge stars like 99% of people wouldn't even have heard of these.. unless your a huge boxing fan

To just picture the monk sitting down putting up tweets with emojis makes me laugh out loud to be honest

Eyes1

Don’t think it’s the monk at all.

Always heard it was the sister of someone v close to him in the NIC. Maybe prompted to write certain things by another / others.

MickyPearse

Gardai expecting a revenge attack in the next few days. Anyone know what gang ordered this hit?

MickyPearse

Eyes1 wrote: »

Don’t think it’s the monk at all.

Always heard it was the sister of someone v close to him in the NIC. Maybe prompted to write certain things by another / others.

That was the inital assumption.DK was paranoid that it was the pengiun last year. Made loads of fake accounts calling him out. That was before mad vicky got involved and was trying to pin it on Padraig o'Reilly haha

r93kaey5p2izun

Don Logan wrote: »

To just picture the monk sitting down putting up tweets with emojis makes me laugh out loud to be honest

I'd laugh if he was behind the loony one with the polls and the excess emojis.