The key elements include six high speed charging hubs on motorways capable of charging eight vehicles simultaneously; 16 high speed charging hubs capable of charging four vehicles simultaneously; additional high power chargers at 34 current 50 kW locations; upgrading over 50 22 kW chargers to 50 kW, and replacing up to 264 locations with 528 charge points at the pre-existing pilot grade of 22 kW to next generation high reliability models.
Busman Paddy Lasty wrote: » Figures post Nov 2019 will be a fun comparison. 1000 MWh of free juice vs ??? MWh paid service.
Zenith74 wrote: » Might make for an interesting poll! Wonder if it includes slow and fast chargers?
innrain wrote: » Still. The largest battery at the time was 38kWh? How many 64kWh Kona/Eniro/Esoul, not to mention Tesla M3s were sold since. To bad ecars does not provide this data as eirgrid does.
Silent Running wrote: I know of a couple of providers where you can avail of free Polar Plus membership allowing you to charge free, or at greatly reduced rate at any Polar charger, and there are a huge amount of Polar chargers in the UK.
Calahonda52 wrote: You too young to remember Ardnacrusha power plant?
innrain wrote: » I skimmed read the article and I found interesting the figure 11 which shows usage of over 1000 MWh per month in Feb 2019. And that is before larger batteries came on the market. at 25c per kWh that's € 250 k per month or about € 3M a year. And since than the number of EV probably doubled.
McGiver wrote: » I'd say it would be higher now, way more cars and larger batteries also. Not sure if double though. But let's say 4-5M year + taxpayers money. Question is - what are the running and maintenance costs?
McGiver wrote: » I'd say it would be higher now, way more cars and larger batteries also. Not sure if double though. But let's say 4-5M year + taxpayers money.
liamog wrote: » I'd suspect that the introduction of fees for charging has caused a reduction in the overall energy requirement. 1 GWh of energy over 7600 cars is 131kWh each. If you take the annual mileage of 17,000km and an average efficiency of 20kWh/100km then the average monthly energy requirement per vehicle is 283kWh. So it would seem at the time of the report, the average EV obtained 46% of it's energy from public charging. I think that number is excessively high. I'm only counting the cars listed in the report as FastAC/CCS/CHAdeMO.
charlieIRL wrote: » I was travelling to Barna / Spiddal yesterday and called into the Galway plaza for a charge, app showed all chargers were free. There was a Model 3 / Ionic and a Tacan charging, all had just started charging. Ionic driver had to park sideways to get charging, a shocking design flaw with the chargers. I went on again and pulled into the FCP in Newcastle, Galway. A few seconds after i started charging a Leaf / Kona and Model 3 pulled in to charge. There was another Model 3 there charging on the 22kW charger. I know we've mentioned it here load of times before but if we are going to continue with more and more EV's on the road, we are going to need a hell of a lot more charging points.
Deleted User wrote: » Indeed we are going to need a lot more chargers and I was saying that the introduction of charging per Kwh won't see the elimination of queuing. And I still say the Rex is as relevant today as it was when it was released. Even if I have 500 Km range, at some point when away from home I'm going to need to use public charging and currently it's not nearly good enough. We need a minimum of 4 DC chargers per site nothing less is good enough. We don't expect petrol or diesel drivers to queue so why are EV drivers expected to do with 1 charger mostly per site ? I think every garage in Ireland should have 4 chargers per site minimum. It does make me think twice about getting rid of the Rex, you just can't beat it, passing queues at chargers, or pull into a garage, car charging, another waiting, fill up with petrol and drive off. I can only imagine being away with the Family, pull up to a charger and a car charging 2 queuing and the missus whinging in my ear for the duration getting madder and madder as time goes on, "we'd have been almost home if you had your i3 still, next time we're going in the Outlander"
Deleted User wrote: » I can only imagine being away with the Family, pull up to a charger and a car charging 2 queuing and the missus whinging in my ear for the duration getting madder and madder as time goes on, "we'd have been almost home if you had your i3 still, next time we're going in the Outlander"
ELM327 wrote: » But it's too small, only 4 small seats, and looks like a moon buggy
ELM327 wrote: But it's too small, only 4 small seats, and looks like a moon buggy
Cyrus wrote: » fair enough but an I3 isnt going to suit everyone. i can imagine trying to pack a buggy, a couple of suitcases and the assorted paraphenalia needed for a family holiday in an I3. actually i cant
ELM327 wrote: » That was my main reason for not getting an i3. The rex made sense and I liked the performance. But it's too small, only 4 small seats, and looks like a moon buggy
Kramer wrote: » You forgot about the pram wheels . Mad_Lad will be raging!
McGiver wrote: » Some call it a "unique design" couldn't care about the looks at all and if so then I prefer something quirky than something conformist or cliché. The 4 seats are OK unless you've a large family or you're a taxi driver. In fact the i3 is more spacious inside than the Leaf despite being a 4-seater and looking smaller from the outside. Short bonnet and tiny boot are the reasons. The boot sucks, but I knew about it before buying... This is the only downside and limiting factor of the car IMHO.
The really big next step is the start of inter-urban/motorway chargers (up to 150kWh) such as the three-bay hubs at Kilcullen and Galway Plaza (free for now; pricing soon). Another one is shortly coming to Portlaoise; there will be one in Kells, Carrick-on-Shannon - to name a couple more - over the next while. The 150kWh can get you 100km in six minutes if your car can take it. Many cars can take 50kWh. "Then in four to six weeks we will be looking at eight-bay hubs that will have super chargers and fast chargers at key national routes by autumn."
liamog wrote: » Independent article reporting on the eCars network.https://www.independent.ie/life/motoring/car-news/what-will-the-ev-charge-networkbelike-in-2025-39404949.html?fbclid=IwAR3XBTP4VrOnlCFkpEwJkTI1TTwzpl4FZ6nQCUORSlm8jApVjfViMVA1Zfk
The price will be commensurate with the advanced technology of these units.
Black_Knight wrote: » ECars (on facebook) saying the 150kW chargers will cost more per kWh than the existing fast chargers.
JPA wrote: » Of course they will. Otherwise they would have just brought them in with the same cost from the start. Also you'd think Ecars themselves would know their kWh from their kW.
liamog wrote: » Independent article reporting on the eCars network.
Black_Knight wrote: » How so? The units are 150kW, and they have a fee based on kWh.
ELM327 wrote: » shudder The really big next step is the start of inter-urban/motorway chargers (up to 150kWh) such as the three-bay hubs at Kilcullen and Galway Plaza