cletus wrote: » If it was me, I'd just tighten down the locking on the cassette you have and see how it feels. Won't take more than a few minutes
magicbastarder wrote: » not just big (up front) to biggest (at back) - you should try to avoid going from big up front to maybe the three biggest at the back. those gear ratios will be available - without cross chaining - going from the small up front to the gears on the middle at the back. it's common enough that if you want to change to an easier gear, but have travelled far enough up the cassette at the back, to drop to the smaller ring on the front while dropping two small rings down at the back.
magicbastarder wrote: » you mean keep the max ratios but narrow the cassette? too many gaps in ratio between gears then. it's not difficult to avoid cross chaining once you're aware of the concept.
onlineweb wrote: » Sounds as if the combination of large large & small small can cause more trouble than they are worth due to wear and tear. Perhaps they should do away with them by removing the largest and smallest from the back cog. So you will have 9 cogs instead of 11.
Type 17 wrote: » You were told correctly - riding with big-big or small-small is called cross-chaining and it causes rapid wear of chain, rings and sprockets.
nialljf wrote: » How much wear on rim braking surface is too much? Is it too much if I can feel any concave wear at all?
tomasrojo wrote: » Trying to find out where I read that (I didn't find it) led me to this, with SRAM being pretty blasé about it
Tony04 wrote: » Middle of the cassette you'll lose high gears and low gears depending on the chainring size not due to the chainline, in fact only really high gears thanks to the new high range cassettes, especially on enduro mtbs etc. 1 x is a better system imo as its simpler but just doesn't have the range on a road bike
ironictoaster wrote: » Quick question. I recently got a new bike however after a couple of days. I'm starting to notice a clicking sound when in the large chain ring in a high gear for every revolution. I checked obvious things like cables hitting the chain etc but I'm convinced it's the chain rubbing off the FR. Just wondering does anyone think this is a quick fix? I looked at a few videos and seems you change the limiting screws. I turned them slightly and retested and it seems not make a difference. Am I better off going back to the shop with this? Thanks!
saccades wrote: » My MTB has 500% range, how much more do you need? My next road bike will be 1x
statto25 wrote: » Very daft question but what direction do you turn the front dereilleur barrel tensioner on an internally routed cable? I would be sitting on the bike if you get me
grogi wrote: » That's a regular thread, so Left to give it more tension, right less tension.
statto25 wrote: » Thank you. Ive always had external cabling so wasnt sure.
irishrover99 wrote: » I dropped my bike into a lbs yo have the BB changed. The new BB is a bigger size so it needed the front derailleur adjusted. When I collected it, the guy told me that I could do with a new front gear cable. I thought nothing of it as it was perfect when I dropped it in. So cycling home I changed gear and it went to the small ring fine but it would not go into the big ring without a lot of pressure and it kinda jumps into the big chain ring. So today I spent 2 hours fiddling about trying to the change the cable and eventually I got it through the frame but it made no difference at all. It’s still very hard to push into the big chain ring. Can anyone give any ideas to why this happened. I’m pissed tbh and looks like I’ll end up bringing it to another shop which will cost me more money.
magicbastarder wrote: » when you say it's wobbling - can you actually wobble the wheel from side to side? or is the wobble caused by a buckle in the rim? are all spokes present and reasonably tight? i.e. no obvious looseness?
Tony04 wrote: » Thru axles/ qr skewer loose???
Type 17 wrote: » Maybe loosen the thru-axle, jiggle the wheel (with the bike upright on its wheels), and then re-tighten the thru-axle.
Type 17 wrote: » Cones have come loose? Take a pic of two of the axle on the non-drive side - let's have a look at what we're dealing with. What kind of noise is/was it?
A broken freehub is usually made apparent by the loss of power to the back wheel when pedalling. While many freehubs can be serviced, it’s easier to just replace basic Shimano models.
*If the system weight is 82 kg or more, you should have your bicycle serviced more frequently to check the spoke tension.
Effects wrote: » Looking for some advice on an issue with losing traction/power on my rear wheel. Seems to happen when I'm pushing hard, and hitting bumpy road service. Gears are indexing fine, so I don't think it's an issue with the derailleur/cogs. Could it be the freehub being worn out, so it's losing traction internally? I haven't checked for chain wear, in case that could be the issue. I've order a wear checker anyway, but might not get it for a week or two. According to Bikeradar: Had a few close calls, but then last Friday it happened when I was sprinting through a junction and I went down pretty hard. Scrapes and bruising from my ankles up to my shoulders. Thinking of replacing the Shimano R500 wheelset for a CAMPAGNOLO CALIMA C17 WHEELSET to see if that will sort the issue out. Old wheels are out of true anyway, and seems like Shimano don't make these anymore. Do I need to worry about this: I'm about 86kg before the bike weight. So close to 100kg in total when I'm carrying a pack.