FG to just do nothing for the next 5 years.

JohnnyFlash wrote: »

The burns unit? What are you on about, dude?

Your record of getting filleted here. Dudebro

Jinglejangle69 wrote: »

What???

No idea what your on about now or with the lombardy thing.

Seriously no idea.

You replied to a post directed at Brendan the brave (and it had his name in the post). Outed. Take a walk in the fresh air. You're crumbling.

Yurt! wrote: »

Your record of getting filleted here. Dudebro

You’ll have to fire up a few examples of that, dude. Well used to county hurling and ignoring the shade thrown at me by malcontents and mouth-breathers.

Brendan Bendar wrote: »

Read them back all the time to verify the clarity and translucency of the content and to make sure I don’t wander off the track of decency Mr Y.

So far, a clean bill of health.

Of course, verily they enjoy high levels of perscipacity, my liege.

You're not in a regency costume drama Brendan (or is it JingleJangle?)

JohnnyFlash wrote: »

You’ll have to fire up a few examples of that, dude. Well used to county hurling and ignoring the shade thrown at me by malcontents and mouth-breathers.

Radical post Brodude.

Yurt! wrote: »

Radical post Brodude.

So you don’t have any examples? Thought as much. You have to get up very early in the morning to catch John Q. Flash out. Which isn’t a habit a lot of SF supporters are into.

Yurt! wrote: »

You replied to a post directed at Brendan the brave (and it had his name in the post). Outed. Take a walk in the fresh air. You're crumbling.

Oh right, calm down there Colombo.

Did it not occur to you I thought you were directing it at me and I didn't see Brendans name in it?

EmmetSpiceland

This is as bad as that time one lad started crying blue murder because 2 lads were posting with the same “avatar”.

Embarrassing stuff, really. Morto, like.

EmmetSpiceland wrote: »

This is as bad as that time one lad started crying blue murder because 2 lads were posting with the same “avatar”.

Embarrassing stuff, really. Morto, like.

I remember that, Emmet. I was one of the accused during that particular fiasco. I get the feeling large quantities of strong cheap cider were involved. Couple of the regulars around here become quite incoherent at night.

Brendan Bendar

JohnnyFlash wrote: »

I remember that, Emmet. I was one of the accused during that particular fiasco. I get the feeling large quantities of strong cheap cider were involved. Couple of the regulars around here become quite incoherent at night.

Being chained to the device for long hours ‘breaking the State’ does that to one John.

Anyway, Lookit, let’s be honest, a bunch like that will never suit up for a real game, on a real field.

Roaring from behind a ditch, is the best they’ll do John.

Brendan Bendar wrote: »

Being chained to the device for long hours ‘breaking the State’ does that to one John.

Anyway, Lookit, let’s be honest, a bunch like that will never suit up for a real game, on a real field.

Roaring from behind a ditch, is the best they’ll do John.

Bedsit socialists, Brendan.

Brendan Bendar

JohnnyFlash wrote: »

Bedsit socialists, Brendan.

https://thecritic.co.uk/what-do-sinn-fein-have-to-do-to-get-a-break/

John,very interesting article here, agrees with most of the excellent evaluation and critiques you have been contributing on this thread.

Read down to the end.

Tokyo

Mod: @Yurt! - threadbanned for contributing nothing but infantile retorts.

smurgen

Brendan Bendar wrote: »

Don’t deal in death Mr Y, I leave that to your fellow-travelers.

Far more experienced in that department than I , I would opine.

I dunno your FG seem to be putting up vague "legal" reasons for not supporting the occupied territories bill. Era I suppose the aul Palestinians are expendable anyway. Having a backbone of sorts might rock the boat too much.

Jinglejangle69 wrote: »

We've broke the state.

Ah classic!!!

What did Vicky Phelan say? How does it relate to Varadkar?

blanch152

Bowie wrote: »

The man's sexuality is neither here nor there.

He doesn't know empathy.

Is it not?

There are some posters who were waving big signs at it for a couple of years.

blanch152 wrote: »

Is it not?

There are some posters who were waving big signs at it for a couple of years.

You'll have to talk to Jingles I never brought it up. Especially not to use for scoring points.I was commenting on a post about Vicky Phelan and Varadkars non apology and he inferred she'd said something about Varadkar but hes not elaborated.

Bowie wrote: »

You'll have to talk to Jingles I never brought it up. Especially not to use for scoring points.I was commenting on a post about Vicky Phelan and Varadkars non apology and he inferred she'd said something about Varadkar but hes not elaborated.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.thejournal.ie/vicky-phelan-leo-varadkar-4606545-Apr2019/%3famp=1

"Vicky Phelan apologises to Leo Varadkar after referring to him as 'a gay man' during criticism"

Bowie wrote: »

You'll have to talk to Jingles I never brought it up. Especially not to use for scoring points.I was commenting on a post about Vicky Phelan and Varadkars non apology and he inferred she'd said something about Varadkar but hes not elaborated.

You named yourself after Leo’s boyfriend on this site. Seems to have been an issue for you tbh, dude.

Jinglejangle69 wrote: »

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.thejournal.ie/vicky-phelan-leo-varadkar-4606545-Apr2019/%3famp=1

"Vicky Phelan apologises to Leo Varadkar after referring to him as 'a gay man' during criticism"

Thanks. Doesn't really help his case on lacking empathy.

JohnnyFlash wrote: »

You named yourself after Leo’s boyfriend on this site. Seems to have been an issue for you tbh, dude.

Not as much as you

EmmetSpiceland

JohnnyFlash wrote: »

You named yourself after Leo’s boyfriend on this site. Seems to have been an issue for you tbh, dude.

Ah, so that’s who that is now. Have to say, I thought that was disgraceful “carry on”.

Odd, creepy and, generally, “sinister”. I’m glad it’s been changed. Hopefully, that’s the end of it now but he should be ashamed of himself for that one.

smurgen wrote: »

I dunno your FG seem to be putting up vague "legal" reasons for not supporting the occupied territories bill. Era I suppose the aul Palestinians are expendable anyway. Having a backbone of sorts might rock the boat too much.

Coveney spoke well on it I'd hopes they'd do what's right.

EmmetSpiceland wrote: »

Ah, so that’s who that is now. Have to say, I thought that was disgraceful “carry on”.

Odd, creepy and, generally, “sinister”. I’m glad it’s been changed. Hopefully, that’s the end of it now but he should be ashamed of himself for that one.

From an ex mod too.

Ex been the operative word.

Wonder why.

Bishop of hope wrote: »

I have to admit this is farcical, that a govt and the HSE can apologise and admit they were wrong and still fight the victims of this terrible scandal.
There is no doubt about Leo's words ringing very hollow and even absurd in this case.
These women and their families deserve their justice without having to go through the courts for it.
Shame on all involved in the treatment of these ladies, sometimes all you can do is shake your head in disbelief at what went on and is going on.

Couldn't agree more.

Bowie wrote: »

Couldn't agree more.

Its not as black and white as that but I know you wony admit that.

Jinglejangle69 wrote: »

Its not as black and white as that but I know you wony admit that.

It is you know.
He didn't apologise to her.