KiKi III wrote: » No, I think there’s nothing wrong with being promiscuous as long as everything is safe, consensual and ideally mutually pleasurable.
Gretas Gonna Get Ya! wrote: » No, I'm certainly not religious. People who sleep around on a regular basis with random strangers, tend to be a bit lost within themselves from my experience. They're usually damaged in some way or another, and are searching for something by having random sexual encounters! Just my opinion. No offence intended towards anyone.
Mister Vain wrote: » A lot of girls on instagram get annoyed when guys make comments on their raunchy pics, but have no problem with the same guys paying for their content on Onlyfans.
EmmetSpiceland wrote: » Do you experience this backlash a lot when commenting on the girl’s “raunchy pics”?
Mister Vain wrote: » No I'm always respectful of course.
Feisar wrote: » Some lad was asking in the comments section for a porn star to send him money as he was poor. Me: Anyone that gets their asshole left looking like a .45 ACP exit wound at work deserves to keep what they make. I thought it was a reasonable point.
leggo wrote: » From people I know it’s literally a case of them being totally exasperated with creeps to the point their attitude is “I may as well make some money and set some boundaries because this is going to happen either way.” Particularly people who have a following already and trade off social media for non-sexual reasons but would be body confident enough to say “**** it, have your **** but pay me at least.” That was particularly the case I saw with the influx of people who did it during lockdown because they found themselves out of work. So yes, they do hate the creepiness, but they’ll tolerate it if it pays their bills because they don’t really have a choice either way beyond ‘leave social media’, which they shouldn’t have to. Which, again, you can judge all you want but I’d imagine a lot of people who do would take it in a second if it were an option to them.
Church on Tuesday wrote: » Yeah, I think that's enough internet for me tonight.
Deleted User wrote: » Ah..Jesus Christ..
Queasy Tadpole wrote: » Are your friends proud to be whores?
Queasy Tadpole wrote: » Yeah Sarah down in accounts... yeah she moonlights as an internet whore... yeah she is making a killing, he check out her asshole... show the lads in sales. How'd you think that would go down for Sarah?
Gretas Gonna Get Ya! wrote: » I've no problem with "dancers". But in my experience, you guys definitely sleep around with more random guys than the average person on the street. A LOT more! So yes, I do consider most of you to be very "easy"... and I find easy women to be a bit trashy and lacking in self respect. I'm generalising of course. But sometimes generalisations are grounded in reality. Each to their own though! It's a free world and all that Jazz!
s1ippy wrote: » Stopped reading after this point because in fairness, for somebody who is willing to take their clothes off for money in front of people, what the hell business is it of yours what consenting adults do to each other behind closed doors. At least they don't have to bring money into it, unlike sex workers who are often forced into the work due to lack of talent/intelligence (besides selling your body) or depraved clientele who have to pay to get some because nobody would shag them otherwise. Clearly there is good and bad in every industry and if you could remove the chip from your shoulder maybe you wouldn't spend your days being sexually exploited and could actually live out some of the bizarre perverted fantasies you imagine the woman buying bread has.
Bubblesxoxx wrote: » Yeah and girls that do that give the rest of us a bad name we don’t mix sleeping with customers into our job we normally laugh about the men who promise us the world to go back and sleep with them. Any girl caught doing **** like that is fired it’s also harmful to the industry. You’d be surprised how many girls in the place are married. There is a few girls that will do anything but then again who doesn’t these days
Bubblesxoxx wrote: » Hahaha How do I have a chip on my shoulder? I’m pointing out that Irish people have the cheek to criticize dancers for basically just going topless with no physical contact and getting paid for it when there is way worse things every day people do. No dancer is ever forced into working in my club or any other club I’ve worked at you are talking about prostitution and I don’t mix the two together at all. Open your eyes women are constantly sexually exploited you barely have to even dress up to get men leering at you or checking you out in day to day life
Gretas Gonna Get Ya! wrote: » Yeah, you are very delusional... I don't care if they are married, married girls sleep around plenty too. I'm sure there are a small minority who just "dance" and go home to their partner... but from what I have seen, they are only the minority. Trying to make "dancers" seem more respectable is a waste of time. Society is never going to see your profession in the way that you would hope... you are only marginally more respectable than hookers. You are really just a slightly more upmarket version of a prostitute, in the eyes of most people in society. (whether they admit this to your face or not) Exotic dancers, strippers... whatever name you wish to use. They have been around forever in places like the US etc... and in all that time the perception has not really changed at all. Yes there are some clubs that have better reputations than others, but the job title itself is still viewed essentially the same way it always was. Sorry if that hurts your feelings, but it's very easy to pick another profession if your goal is to be more respected by people!
A Tyrant Named Miltiades! wrote: » Is the exchange of money for nudity not a power imbalance, just like it would be if (say) a fashion photograoher demanded nude pics from models? We've seen high profile cases like that in the metoo movement. I haven't really thought about it, but there is at least a grey area here. The introduction of money for sexual gratification surely implies a power imbalance.
ExMachina1000 wrote: » What happened to my body my choice
A Tyrant Named Miltiades! wrote: » Choice has to be based on consent, freely given. There seems to me to be a tension between consent and power imbalance, eg can't pay rent if you dont take off your clothes for someone's sexual gratification. Maybe there is a good way of resolving that, it's more of a question than a statement.
Gretas Gonna Get Ya! wrote: » Exotic dancers, strippers... whatever name you wish to use. They have been around forever in places like the US etc...