Gretas Gonna Get Ya! wrote: » It's very unlikely that these professions will ever become recognised as "normal" everyday jobs... and this has nothing to do with people being conservative or non-progressive in their thinking. Strip clubs etc have been as common as muck in most large US towns and cities for decades... and generally speaking Americans would be more open-minded about these things than our post catholic sexually repressed Ireland. And nevertheless, if you move into any middle class suburban neighbourhood in the US and tell your neighbours that you moonlight as an exotic dancer on the weekends for some extra money, you will get very similar reactions from people that you would here in Ireland. You won't get ostracised from society... but people will generally have less respect for your choice of job. It's nothing to do with people needing to catch up with the times over here, or learn more about the industry... it's a seedy industry. Period. It doesn't mean you're a terrible person for choosing to get involved in it for some money. But people will always have slightly less respect for you, no matter what part of the world you do it in...
s1ippy wrote: » I 100% do, which is why I said in my initial post that it's pathetic anyone has to bring money into sexual exchanges. It devalues the whole situation when you reduce it to a financial figure. But I suppose some of us have the luxury of enjoying sex and for others, it's a seedy transaction. I can't believe the OP begrudges those of us who enjoy having sex for fun while at the same time insists we respect them for charging people to watch her undress. That's an insane demand.
Mr.S wrote: » I have one friend who does OnlyFans, it's absolutely mind-blogging the amount of money she makes from it - on top of working full time in a career-type job. She had a deposit saved for her house under 12 months as a result of doing it. Mental. Power to them, I don't see the issue as long as they are happy with their photos being online, if it works for them - what's the issue?
Ultrflat wrote: » If your working full time, I believe your aloud to earn a certain amount of money before its taxable. not 100% tho
Mr.S wrote: » Yep, all above board.
anewme wrote: » Are they paying tax on their earnings?
joe40 wrote: » Would you have the same scorn for the Men who go to these establishment or engage with the activity.
EmmetSpiceland wrote: » Or that pub in Ballyferriter, Co. Kerry, who was offering money to anyone who’d go topless.
anewme wrote: » Anyone remember this Lady? Toni, Exotic dancer, from Ballyfermot who took up 'exotic dancing' to pay for her kids music lessons after her husband lost his job. Interesting snapshot of life in Ireland the 80's. I remember her posters would be up locally and some people going, oh isnt that terrible!https://www.rte.ie/archives/2016/1129/835226-toni-exotic-dancer/
Gretas Gonna Get Ya! wrote: » Exotic dancers, strippers... whatever name you wish to use. They have been around forever in places like the US etc...
A Tyrant Named Miltiades! wrote: » Choice has to be based on consent, freely given. There seems to me to be a tension between consent and power imbalance, eg can't pay rent if you dont take off your clothes for someone's sexual gratification. Maybe there is a good way of resolving that, it's more of a question than a statement.
ExMachina1000 wrote: » What happened to my body my choice
A Tyrant Named Miltiades! wrote: » Is the exchange of money for nudity not a power imbalance, just like it would be if (say) a fashion photograoher demanded nude pics from models? We've seen high profile cases like that in the metoo movement. I haven't really thought about it, but there is at least a grey area here. The introduction of money for sexual gratification surely implies a power imbalance.
Gretas Gonna Get Ya! wrote: » Yeah, you are very delusional... I don't care if they are married, married girls sleep around plenty too. I'm sure there are a small minority who just "dance" and go home to their partner... but from what I have seen, they are only the minority. Trying to make "dancers" seem more respectable is a waste of time. Society is never going to see your profession in the way that you would hope... you are only marginally more respectable than hookers. You are really just a slightly more upmarket version of a prostitute, in the eyes of most people in society. (whether they admit this to your face or not) Exotic dancers, strippers... whatever name you wish to use. They have been around forever in places like the US etc... and in all that time the perception has not really changed at all. Yes there are some clubs that have better reputations than others, but the job title itself is still viewed essentially the same way it always was. Sorry if that hurts your feelings, but it's very easy to pick another profession if your goal is to be more respected by people!
Bubblesxoxx wrote: » Hahaha How do I have a chip on my shoulder? I’m pointing out that Irish people have the cheek to criticize dancers for basically just going topless with no physical contact and getting paid for it when there is way worse things every day people do. No dancer is ever forced into working in my club or any other club I’ve worked at you are talking about prostitution and I don’t mix the two together at all. Open your eyes women are constantly sexually exploited you barely have to even dress up to get men leering at you or checking you out in day to day life
Bubblesxoxx wrote: » Yeah and girls that do that give the rest of us a bad name we don’t mix sleeping with customers into our job we normally laugh about the men who promise us the world to go back and sleep with them. Any girl caught doing **** like that is fired it’s also harmful to the industry. You’d be surprised how many girls in the place are married. There is a few girls that will do anything but then again who doesn’t these days
s1ippy wrote: » Stopped reading after this point because in fairness, for somebody who is willing to take their clothes off for money in front of people, what the hell business is it of yours what consenting adults do to each other behind closed doors. At least they don't have to bring money into it, unlike sex workers who are often forced into the work due to lack of talent/intelligence (besides selling your body) or depraved clientele who have to pay to get some because nobody would shag them otherwise. Clearly there is good and bad in every industry and if you could remove the chip from your shoulder maybe you wouldn't spend your days being sexually exploited and could actually live out some of the bizarre perverted fantasies you imagine the woman buying bread has.
Gretas Gonna Get Ya! wrote: » I've no problem with "dancers". But in my experience, you guys definitely sleep around with more random guys than the average person on the street. A LOT more! So yes, I do consider most of you to be very "easy"... and I find easy women to be a bit trashy and lacking in self respect. I'm generalising of course. But sometimes generalisations are grounded in reality. Each to their own though! It's a free world and all that Jazz!
Queasy Tadpole wrote: » Are your friends proud to be whores?
Queasy Tadpole wrote: » Yeah Sarah down in accounts... yeah she moonlights as an internet whore... yeah she is making a killing, he check out her asshole... show the lads in sales. How'd you think that would go down for Sarah?