NeftDaslari wrote: » It’s almost suggesting that having an unpunctual bus service (because it’s always stuck in traffic) and a bike lane, that begins and ends at dangerous roundabouts, are both disincentives to using those facilities.
Laviski wrote: » courtesy of Luas, this shows the high caliber of cyclists failing to adhering rules of the road. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=88zczDEsmYs
Laviski wrote: » lThey should use what has being given and if there issues with what is provided then write to council to have it addressed or engage your local Councillor.
Laviski wrote: » cyclists should be registered if on the road and sure why not.. they should pay road tax if they want a decent surface.
Laviski wrote: » courtesy of Luas, this shows the high caliber of cyclists failing to adhering rules of the road. They should use what has being given and if there issues with what is provided then write to council to have it addressed or engage your local Councillor. the yahoo that cycles with the camera in hand filming people and their children should be banned from the road. Danger to those around. No fines or penalty points for these folks. cyclists should be registered if on the road and sure why not.. they should pay road tax if they want a decent surface. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=88zczDEsmYs
Laviski wrote: » in galway it rains over 200 days in the year.... PT with P&R is the way forward as a solution to getting people in and around galway.
at1withmyself wrote: » Oh wait bother gem bringing up weather...
Laviski wrote: » dedicated cyclists just demand, demand demand but don't pay or want to pay.... hence if you want infra - then pay for it
Laviski wrote: » call a spade a space, using excuse for not using cycle lanes due to road condition. now the pic used was only on one side of the road - whats wrong with the other side, used it myself myself don't get and punctures or a unsatisfactory ride. Keeps me safe off the main road being exactly where i should be. dedicated cyclists just demand, demand demand but don't pay or want to pay.... hence if you want infra - then pay for it. Talk to your new green general now part of government to start hiking taxes which is probably going to happen. weather is galway is real, galway isn't a flat city, cycling up a hill with the SW winds in full force in your face from the Atlantic ain't fun. If i get wet and putting some effort in i have better ways to do so that i would enjoy. a lot of reporting of poor cycling behavior just isn't reported as they have no registration plate or a method to identify them unless they become known to gardai.
ben.schlomo wrote: » If you think that's acceptable, in good condition and conducive to increasing cycling then you're fooling none bar yourself. As for your baseless final paragraph, sure can't we say the same for every mode of transport. I didn't report the taxi that forced me off my bike on the Dublin Rd for example.
JCX BXC wrote: » I understand it falls under the remit of transport, but cycling infrastructure is really a seperate discussion to traffic doesn't it? My 2 cents is this, cycling infrastructure is desperately needed in some areas of Galway, however this shouldn't always be done to the detriment of motorized vehicles, as is often the done thing. However, expecting this to solve traffic to any great extent, and that everyone and their grandmother will have bikes is just absurd. The weather in Galway is horrific, especially the winter just gone. Rotten almost everyday. Most people don't want to cycle to work, to get soaked going in and soaked coming back home. If you do, great. We need to be realistic here and we are limited by climate. Let's pretend that despite the weather, many get a bike so they can cycle to work when the weathers good. Great, what happens when the forecast is bad? Traffic grinds to a halt? A very poor solution imo. Public transport and carpooling is the way to go to reduce traffic among our existing routes. Cycling is a dud of an idea in terms of traffic reduction in Galway. However, this does not mean cycling infrastructure should be ignored, far from it.
donvito99 wrote: » Has wet gear made it west of the Shannon yet?
Laviski wrote: » since those roads were built usage for cyclist is barely existent, be it cycling or driving the amount of cyclist is barely 1 on crossing at peak times, sure you get the odd group. Same can be said for the entire stretch to knocknacarra. I ain't from the royal family and as such not expecting red carpet treatment, i have used the other side numerous times when taking alternate route a result of needing to go to the menlo park hotel for blood donations - the cycle path is fine (not saying perfect) which keeps me safe away from vehicle traffic on main road. Perhaps you should invest in a bike with suspension and get a new seat with a cushion. If you can't take the 1 or 2 seconds to look and remember a licence plate, then that is your problem/inability. Perhaps you should invest in a go pro with the appropriate helmet so its safely attached.
ben.schlomo wrote: » but I chose not to report
John_Rambo wrote: » Cyclists and motorists pay tax. If you want to demand tax equality for cycle infrastructure & motor infrastructure you're playing right in to the hands of the cycle lobbyists. It's almost as silly as demanding road tax for road users. I have one bike and three cars, you'll put two of my cars off the road with your ill thought demands. Calm down and think through what you're asking for.
Jazmin Harsh Gold wrote: » This argument that “I have a car and to tax on that so why on a bike” falls down by the fact if you have two cars you pay tax on two cars if you have 2 cars and a tractor you pay tax on all 3. Anything that goes on the road with wheels pays tax except for bikes (and scooters etc but these are far less prevalent for now anyway). We should be reducing the cost of car ownership which is far too high and taking money off cyclists etc who don’t contribute for that vehicle.
topcat77 wrote: » Motorist pay Carbon Tax not road tax. How much tax does an electric car pay?
Jazmin Harsh Gold wrote: » We should be reducing the cost of car ownership which is far too high and taking money off cyclists etc who don’t contribute for that vehicle.
donvito99 wrote: » In all likelihood the cyclists are paying tax but doing us a favour and leaving the car at home. Will you be taxing school children cycling to school? Or do they have to be driven there as well now if they can't fork up?
Laviski wrote: » Still more than a cyclist. All motor vehicles including electric cars pay road tax.
ben.schlomo wrote: » How has the cycling tax gotten on in other countries? You know, the ones where they actually have cycling infrastructure. Looking forward to reading about it.