Same rule as the old thread…
Duckjob wrote: » Went out for a little local bike ride with MrsD this afternoon, and my my, the loons were out. First incident, couple of hundred metres from home, at a little traffic calming chicane that is only wide enough for traffic one-way and has yields are either end so you have to yield to whatever is on the section. Halfway through the section and a car appears at the other end, sees us, driver decides he doesn't want to yield and comes straight towards us. Chap driving didn't like me staying in the middle of the lane and gave me the standard "in the middle of the road" nonsense. Second incident, on a very quiet rural country lane barely more than the width of a car. SUV coming the other way showing no sign of slowing down, so I stayed out enough that they eventually had to slow. Gammon-faced lady driving was miffed that I made her slow down instead of scuttling in to the verge and letting her pass within inches of us at 30-40kph, telling me I need to "share the road". Honestly, I think they're giving away driving licences on the backs of Weetabix boxes at this stage.
Duckjob wrote: » ... Second incident, on a very quiet rural country lane barely more than the width of a car. SUV coming the other way showing no sign of slowing down, so I stayed out enough that they eventually had to slow. Gammon-faced lady driving was miffed that I made her slow down instead of scuttling in to the verge and letting her pass within inches of us at 30-40kph, telling me I need to "share the road".
MojoMaker wrote: » Cameras lads, it's the only way you'll ever have a chance of holding anyone accountable for this sh1t.
padyjoe wrote: » One thing for certain: there are more than usual 'mad' drivers on the road lately.
CramCycle wrote: » Bloody Eir van followed a car overtaking on a solid white line. now he gave space but the reason for the white line is that there is a bend that fairly obstructs the view. Anyway, halfway in, he meets cars and a squad car coming and pulls in on me. Thankfully I was able to slam on. He then ran a red where a family were starting to cross. Caught up with him in Bray, laughing to himself as he watched videos on his phone while moving in traffic. I just went on as I was not going to come across as reasonable if I went up to him.
breezy1985 wrote: » About 2 years ago my commute in London ended on a 2 lane few hundred metre road that always had some Uber taxis parked on the opposite side to me. The oncoming traffic would always try squeeze past me and run me onto the path so after a few weeks I always took the road in the middle of my lane and would get chronic abuse despite the obstruction being on their side
breezy1985 wrote: » If I am already half way through the obstructed area they should wait and same the other way around. I should have pointed out this was late at night so its only a car or two not streams of traffic
hesker wrote: » I fantasise afterwards that if I had a hammer in my hand I would have flung it through his window.
CramCycle wrote: » Having lightly tapped a Santa Fe rear window, I respectfully disagree.
Seth Brundle wrote: » Whilst I've often imagined this, it takes a lot to smash a car window.
Seth Brundle wrote: » Whilst I've often imagined this, it takes a lot to smash a car window. Something with a pointed corner e.g. the end of a spark plug is more likely to quickly break the glass but you're unlikely to succeed if throwing it
MojoMaker wrote: » Some sobering moments there for sure. More than winced at several :eek:
onlineweb wrote: » Luas crashes, some silly mistakes by cyclists here.https://www.thejournal.ie/luas-accidents-warning-5157839-Jul2020/
Curb Your Enthusiasm wrote: » https://twitter.com/dublincycling/status/1286357240224587778?s=19
MojoMaker wrote: » Interesting bit of spin by Transdev in that case. 5% of incidents involved cyclists yet they chose to feature cyclists in 50% of the incidents shown in the clip. There's a term for that.
CramCycle wrote: » by the look of it, reaction times by staff seem to be exceptional
CramCycle wrote: » I wonder is that true though, not sure if there have been any deaths or enough to do an analysis but hear me out. The LUAS is not exactly a high speed vehicle, by the look of it, reaction times by staff seem to be exceptional. Bar a dead on collision where the driver keeps going, I'd actually prefer to be a pedestrian who hopefully bounces off rather than a car where i am pinned in and nowhere to go. This is obviously dependent on the fact that I am still reasonably fit and would also vary on collision to collision. TLDR, your almost certainly more likely to be killed as a pedestrian or cyclist in a set up scenario but in real life, day to day collisions, I wonder would the risks if analysed concur with that assumption.
CramCycle wrote: » ..The LUAS is not exactly a high speed vehicle, by the look of it...