The key elements include six high speed charging hubs on motorways capable of charging eight vehicles simultaneously; 16 high speed charging hubs capable of charging four vehicles simultaneously; additional high power chargers at 34 current 50 kW locations; upgrading over 50 22 kW chargers to 50 kW, and replacing up to 264 locations with 528 charge points at the pre-existing pilot grade of 22 kW to next generation high reliability models.
liamog wrote: » What real infrastructure looks like
Deleted User wrote: » The route were taking regarding payment or to access chargers is bad also. You pay for petrol and diesel with euros, credit card, debit card or cash, all universal payment methods, the same should apply with charging and stop this nonsense of one card or fob for each network it’s mental and that should be sorted sooner rather than later.
unkel wrote: The private sector works effectively and efficiently. State companies like the ESB do not. Heavy subsidies and free charging distort the market and prevent healthy competition.
liamog wrote: » It depends what you want from a national charging network. An element of state support is required at the beginning to ensure there is a critical spread of chargers. The difference between us and other EU countries, is that our government just outsourced the whole issue to ESB and let them get on with it. Other countries used an agency like the NTA to fund chargers, but via open competition. Fortum is a state owned Finnish Energy Company, but has a huge network of charging infrastructure across the Nordics. Similarly Fastned, a private company, competed for charging sites in The Netherlands, the UK has a number of fast chargers by many companies, funded by OLEV. Our typically Irish approach was to avoid government interference in the roll out of the infrastructure, but pay the bills for a semi state to do it anyway, we're very good at grasping defeat from the jaws of victory.
Cyrus wrote: » from the etron owners forum on facebook the UK doesnt seem any great shakes either.
liamog wrote: » The UK motorway network was captured by the worst operator, Electric Highway signed exclusivity deals with the service stations and didn't invest in upgrades or expansion. If you step away from the motorways there are now lots of DC chargers in supermarkets and pub car parks.
McGiver wrote: » And here lies the issue with privatising Ecars - I bet it would be bought by crappy UK operators...
AndyBoBandy wrote: » A subscription service could be a good earner for them; €5-€10 per month for unlimited AC charging (DC charging charged at a per kWh rate) €25 per month for unlimited AC & DC (DC capped at 200kWh) €35 per month for unlimited AC & DC (DC capped at 400kWh)
Silent Running wrote: » As far as I can see in most countries the electricity retailers have bought in and offer reduced rate - or free - public car charging to their account holders. Why has this not happened here?
McGiver wrote: » Free? Where? All what I see is paid charging across the whole Europe. Actually, electricity providers seem to be favouring subscription/tariff based solutions rather than PAYG. I think that's the way it will move ahead.
slave1 wrote: » Northern Ireland is free charging, Scotland is largely free charging
McGiver wrote: » NI is not a country in true sense. Scotland is a borderline case in fairness. Any actual independent countries in Europe?
McGiver wrote: » Free? Where?All what I see is paid charging across the whole Europe. Actually, electricity providers seem to be favouring subscription/tariff based solutions rather than PAYG. I think that's the way it will move ahead.
Silent Running wrote: » Other companies have tariffs that offer EV owners a night rate even cheaper than the normal economy 7 night rate to attract customers.
unkel wrote: » There's even a company in the UK - Octopus - that pay you if you take their electricity at some times :cool: This is the new future of massive renewables where at some times electricity is very cheap, free, or even has a negative value while we adjust our grid (storage) to cope with it. Interesting times! I'm ready for it, within a year I hope to have at least 120kWh of storage that I can connect to my house
McGiver wrote: » Exactly. Let the state focus on what they can (or could) do right - legislation, regulations and incentives. Not on building infrastructure which they were proven to be bad at time and time again.
Silent Running wrote: » Wouldn't it be crap if you paid €35 a month while others are being paid to take electricity?
ELM327 wrote: » I don't think I'd pay a subscription as I don't use it enough. Most routes are now covered by SuC, Ionity-Maingau and easygo that I don't need a subscription for.
unkel wrote: » Not a chance I'll pay any of them even a fiver a month for a subscription It does seem like a viable business model though. In NL you pay Fastned €0.59 /kWh PAYG or €0.35 /kWh as a member paying €11.99 per month subscription. I would happily pay the former for the rare occasion I need public fast charging. The latter is for people who do a lot of travel and of course for the people who don't have a car charge point at home for their EV (a considerable and growing percentage of EV owners in the Netherlands but almost 0% of owners in Ireland)
Silent Running wrote: » Any you do quite a high mileage, don't you? I think most EV drivers would be the same and wouldn't use it enough to justify any subscription... but you would probably switch your home electricity supplier if they offered you free or reduced cost charging on a popular network, like Polar in the UK.
Stealthirl wrote: » From this report https://www.mdpi.com/2032-6653/11/1/18
innrain wrote: » I skimmed read the article and I found interesting the figure 11 which shows usage of over 1000 MWh per month in Feb 2019. And that is before larger batteries came on the market. at 25c per kWh that's € 250 k per month or about € 3M a year. And since than the number of EV probably doubled.