rainbowtrout wrote: » A lot of people seem to have very little faith in students and their ability to queue. They have to queue everywhere now. Why should they behave any differently coming into a school.
Rosita wrote: » I think it's harder than you might imagine. Take this for example: We are reopening schools on the basis that national cases do not go above 30 per day. Is it tenable to close schools in Kerry and Waterford if the 30 cases are in Cavan and Monaghan? There are so many variables that no government is going to stand over a gun-to-the-head comment like that where a journalist is going apoplectic saying "but you said...................". And socially distanced queues? Where? Is there space to queue 700 students like that? If it's outdoor what about when the weather is dire? And what about the latecomers wandering around the school? It's easy to pick holes in this. Leaving aside specific details like that, essentially the government is going to have to square the circle where they are on the one hand advising that no more than 50 people can gather in a very large church, or 200 outdoor in a very large GAA ground with a scenario where they are expected to put 30 teenagers into a relatively tiny space. They have crashed the economy on the basis of social distancing and now have to organise their own house in contravention of all those decisions. I'd say that's difficult. And PPE, visors etc.......................we know that this is readily available and sourceable, do we? Not so sure. And all being organised at a time when it is anticipated that cases are likely to be rising, and the country has never threatened to get to zero cases. I would think organising all of that in a situation where every single thing you do will be criticised to the hilt by somebody is actually quite difficult. I am giving the Minister the benefit of the doubt and time will tell but at the moment I am glad that she is reticent about giving out details that she does not have. The alternative is Simon Harris's constant "we are going back to school any day now" updates. At least let us acknowledge the difficulty of the challenge.
rainbowtrout wrote: » In my school if a student is late they have to get a stamp in their journal in the office before they can come to class. No stamp, they are sent back down to the office. Same can apply here. Late student has temperature taken, and gets a stamp. No stamp, no entry. I already said a few days ago that if there are clusters it’s more likely that individual schools would be closed for a couple of weeks rather than shut down the country. You also make it sound like the government crashed the economy on purpose. They didn’t. Half the world went into lockdown. If you don’t put a number on outdoor gatherings then you will have thousands congregating. Schools are far from ideal places to reopen but our numbers are fixed, unlike the attendance at a gaa match or a funeral.
Rosita wrote: » Yeah, the late stamp thing works in my school too for about the first three weeks of September but then the hassle of facilitating the few habitually late people becomes too much and they end up wandering around, hiding in the toilet until the next class etc. while management are just too busy to man-mark such people to the detriment of everything else. You sound as if you think it'll be just school as normal. I have no idea why you are explaining to me the need for restrictions on numbers at outdoor and indoor gatherings. I never challenged that. I simply said that it creates a context for gatherings and numbers which makes schools inoperable. And the government will have to grapple with that and explain to say McDonald's why they cannot have 100 kids in their restaurants simultaneously while schools can have bigger gatherings in the same space. Now maybe a large hypocritical double-think fudge will be the answer. But maybe not.
rainbowtrout wrote: » I'm not saying it will be perfect, but you seem to only see problems rather than trying to look for solutions. .
mirrorwall14 wrote: » I’m so torn on this. On the one hand I’m a parent and I want my child back at school and like every other parent my childcare is planned around the school. I’m sick of teaching online. I want to be back in school with my students teaching and learning properly and not some farce of blended learning However I also cannot agree with the ridiculous scenario that would mean we would be the only work place in the country where the rules don’t apply? What makes us immune that we don’t need PPE or social distancing? I can’t go to the hairdressers without social distancing and PPE but I can get up close and personal with 30 students at a time....
Rosita wrote: » I'm laughing to myself at the thought of kids' temperatures being taken. It'll be gas chasing the usual suspects for the signed permission slips especially if they realise that they cannot be allowed into school without it but cannot really be sent home either!! It'll be interesting to see if we actually get any teaching time in the autumn after all the red tape which will envelop us.
rainbowtrout wrote: » Of course they can be sent home; health and safety. In the same way that you have to wear a mask on public transport and in shops. I haven't seen anyone walking around the shops in my local town without a mask this week. I'm sure there are people out there who aren't compliant, but it would seem that the vast majority are. The student I spoke to this morning didn't have a problem with her temperature being taken, she just accepted it as something that has to be done for her to enter the dancing class. You're the one laughing at what are becoming standard procedures in some places and as I said, looking for problems rather than solutions.
wirelessdude01 wrote: » Unless it is contained in law then the school is pretty much pi$$ing in the wind.
grind gremlin wrote: » Unfortunately in primary school it frequently happens that a parent does not pick up the phone when the school calls.
byhookorbycrook wrote: » On the taking of temperatures, what staff member supervises this ?I’ve heard of parents giving children Calpol on the way to school in the car . Staggered drop offs will mean more staff - In primary , you will need someone to collect from the drop off line and bring the child to their teacher . If we are doing “ pods” of children and staff , that’s going to be problematic.Shared SNAs are going to find things to exceptionally difficult as well. Staggered home times in theory should be easier as the infant day is shorter - but what happens to older siblings at that stage ? Yard supervision will require extra adults as well - and again this is going to be difficult in “ pods .” Summer works scheme funding should have been made available in May , most schools need to upgrade bathrooms at the very least . If you don’t allow a child who hasn’t been temperature checked in and that child decides to head down town etc. a school would be in serious bother . Schools will certainly open, but hard to see how they can reopen with anything like full capacity . Much of the above comes down to funding and resources . It’s been obvious to most of those working in schools what is needed , but the DES are going for the cheapest and easiest option. People who aren’t working in the sector don’t seem to realize there aren’t spare staff stacked in a store room somewhere to do all of this .
Rosita wrote: » I have no idea what people wearing masks or an individual not having an issue with her temperature being taken has got to do with the experiences I have had in my school. It was an observation based on my experience of a number of students not another front in an argument.
Polka_Dot wrote: » Had to laugh at this quote from Leo Varadkar: He said:“We want to get all the details right before we share them widely” because what would undermine confidence is to come out with a set of details and plans today and then change them in a week’s time or ten days’ time”. “Mixed messages and changing messages isn’t a good strategy,” he said. Not that I disagree, but something called the "Leaving Cert" comes to mind...
rainbowtrout wrote: » Students who don’t typically play by the rules in school are returning to a very different set of circumstances this year where health protection overrides most other things. Don’t see why you can’t see that.
Rosita wrote: » Virgin Media news reporting that the announcement will be a one-metre social distancing regime in schools. Not sure what the precise impact of that would be but presumably it will halve class sizes.
wirelessdude01 wrote: » Would you happen to have a link? Had a quick look and can't find one.
Rosita wrote: » It was said by a reporter on the 5.30 news on TV.
wirelessdude01 wrote: » Not mentioned on RTE news or so far on primetime.
theblackstuff wrote: » loads of talk about schools, but what about school transport, plenty of secondary and primary school kids get buses to and from school, what plans for these buses. Social distance in school is one thing but the buses to and from school??