whelan2 wrote: » I used 4728, checked ai book there alot of repeats to him. I will ring ai man tomorrow. These would have been fresh straws. Very obvious the repeats when you look at the book.
Downtown123 wrote: » Regarding fr4854. The semen went though all the usual tests and flew through. It was even sent to Germany according to last weeks journal and passed there. Tbf, its just one of those things i'd say. Tbf there's so many bulls out there now that spreading the risk is an easy task, especially if DIY AI and not tied to one station. He wasn't even that good a bull... I know it would be seriously annoying but there have been many people paid big money for stock bulls without results as well! Some people love to knock down NCBC whenever they get a chance.... milk recording, triplestar,etc. (btw I've no ties to them just get sick of the same fellas complaining the whole time about them)
mahoney_j wrote: » Are u sure in that ,triple star never mentioned nor ncbc in praticular nor milk recording ........ Anyway to me the fault is with icbf snd how these figures are generated faults have been discovered before and in my opinion there’s another one lurking away there now (fertility score calculation )ai companies pump huge money into these bulls and its them who have to carry most of the flak when bills go wrong ..we’ve too many proof runs and too many base changes ,also advice keeps changing on how many bulls to use u simply can’t have faith in something like this far too many duds comming thru and there figures tank when stock start hitting the ground .caveat emptor ....
mickey1985 wrote: » Lads anyone on this pit in a dairy geyser? I'm undecided whether to go with that or put in gas for water heating. Gas is 2500 to install. Can't see much information on anyone who put in a geyser
alps wrote: » Have no idea how good they are, however their documentation relating to savings to be made are farcical.
atlantic mist wrote: » that was pivital he was used a lot down here, avg results for conception
Grueller wrote: » Ugh. F*cking scc gone up to 177 from 76. I'll have to strip them in the morning now. I have a few that kick the sh1te out of me every time I have to do it.
Say my name wrote: » It could be 76 again the next collection and ne'r a cow touched..
Grueller wrote: » Ya I milked them two hours early on Sunday and they were fair agitated over it. Could be the cause.
Sacrolyte wrote: » What’s the crack with this “Tag threshold” for calf registrations. Hope it’s not the Green Party been sneaky trying to cut cow numbers.
straight wrote: » I'd say not. They're just going to remove us from the land through designations. Ah well.
Keepgrowing wrote: » Some may be interestedhttps://twitter.com/irishgrassland/status/1282740869473415168?s=21
Mooooo wrote: » The hour this evening was very interesting, good event
Buford T. Justice XIX wrote: » Interesting grenade thrown by Conor Creedon, the ground he limes in the Autumn is the land he goes to first in spring:D
Castlekeeper wrote: » Am I missing something or is there no link on that tweet? I'm a member and I wasn't sent any link???
Castlekeeper wrote: » Why is that a "grenade"? Lime generally flushes nutrients from the soil so it would make sense that there would be a corresponding flush of growth.
Mooooo wrote: » It was more in response to the belief that it can make ground difficult in wet weather and he said he was in paddocks first the following spring following aut application