Mooooo wrote: » Did the same happen with a "top" je bull as well?. Surely semen fertility should be step 1 in any bull put to the market...
mahoney_j wrote: » Use of these genomic bulls needs to come with a health warning reliability of them dropped big time advice before was 6 bulls now 10 Plus and they maintain relability is improving
Buford T. Justice XIX wrote: » Something along the lines of zero conceptions. One local big operation is supposed to have used 200 of his straws:eek:
jaymla627 wrote: » the 10 plus bulls is a get out of jail free card for ai companies, if a lad used say the one bull heavily and ended up with a crap batch of heifers, once they hit the parlour its becomes glarilngly obvious that high ebi genomic bulls are a croc of s88t, but by spreading it out you get less duds, and the farmer dosent see a pattern emerging.... Ordered 100 straws here of a bull used heavily the past 3 years on the back of how good the 1st calvers are that i have a good lot of impossible to do this if using a heap of new bulls every year as you cant see what type of bulls are suiting your herd and what isnt if you only have a few of each bulls heifers calving down yearly
cosatron wrote: » I wonder would the ai company be liable for loss of earnings due to selling a product that wasn't fit for purpose.
whelan2 wrote: » Well that's definitely putting all your eggs in one basket. I use 50 per cent proven 50 per cent genomic
mahoney_j wrote: » Tbh I don’t put the bulk of the blame at the door of ai companies they have to sell bulls that farmers want tegasc are and have been pushing high ebi bulls as lib on the back of figures generated by the icbf .the big issue is all the base changes and subsequent fluctuations on bulls figures the quality of high ebi genomics has crashed in last 2/3 years
straight wrote: » You would think that the dairy heros would know better. His milk index is too low for me to consider anyway.
mahoney_j wrote: » Look at most of high ebi bulls now totally unbalanced figures ...in time they’ll get worse
Buford T. Justice XIX wrote: » Anybody use much of FR4854 this year?
straight wrote: » What happened Fr4728. Kilfeacle Pivotal. He seems to be gone off the active list.
Green&Red wrote: » Is this the same straw mentioned on the journal about a month back or a new offender?
mahoney_j wrote: » He put very little cows/heifers in calf
GrasstoMilk wrote: » Hows that? I have 40 incalf to him
awaywithyou wrote: » use all proven bulls from WWS here in the last couple years... a figure i look at very closely is the SCR (sire conception rate) especially when choosin the sexed semen
Buford T. Justice XIX wrote: » I'd say all that will be returned would be the price of the insemination.
Say my name wrote: » In sport horse ai. The stud farm takes a sample from every jump and its examined under the microscope before the rest is put in straws.
Siamsa Sessions wrote: » Can the experts, who have little exposure if things go wrong, start looking towards the no-foal-no-fee model maybe???
Say my name wrote: » Fair mess up though. In sport horse ai. The stud farm takes a sample from every jump and its examined under the microscope before the rest is put in straws. It'd be fairly difficult to get confidence back in farmers now that seemingly corners are being cut by this ai station. No where near good enough these days.
yosemitesam1 wrote: » Would imagine that it wasn't a lack of swimmers but some sort of genetic defect that they carried
atlantic mist wrote: » lad next door used one of pg bulls that only had 10%conception rate, they have since recallled all straws of the bull and covered the cost of initial serve and all repeats, bull passed all quality tests what i am starting not to like about the ai straws is the watering down of straws of top bulls to get a larger quanity, pushing the use of "fresh" straws for extra price during breeding
whelan2 wrote: » I used 4728, checked ai book there alot of repeats to him. I will ring ai man tomorrow. These would have been fresh straws. Very obvious the repeats when you look at the book.