2u2me wrote: » This article from BBC would disagree, quoting Sara McLanahan,professor of sociology at Princeton University, in the US, where she has overseen the "Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study."https://www.bbc.com/news/education-47057787
Foxtrol wrote: » Correlation isn't causation. If anything the evidence points to the opposite that you are implying. It isn't race that causes single parent households, it is poverty. Look at Dublin, where are there more single parents - Tallaght or D4?
In this research, even allowing for economic disadvantage, Prof McLanahan said, data began to show the impact of instability on a child's life. Those whose parents had divorced were more likely to fail to progress at school. Children who were in what the researchers characterised as a "fragile family", where parents were cohabiting or there was a lone parent, were twice as likely not to graduate from high school. Prof McLanahan said the data showed that even a child in a stable single-parent household was likely to do worse on some measures than a child of a married couple. "Having two adults who co-operate to raise the child, who give time and money, means there are just more resources than one doing it," she said. [...] "There is still a difference between the outcomes of children born to single-parent households, versus married or cohabiting, even when you taken into account they tend to be from poorer homes."
Eric Cartman wrote: » Its fathers . In the US an average of 35% of kids grow up in single parent households. Among asians the single parent rate is 16% Among whites its 24% Among blacks its 67%https://datacenter.kidscount.org/data/tables/107-children-in-single-parent-families-by-race#detailed/1/any/false/37,871,870,573,869,36,868,867,133,38/10,11,9,12,1,185,13/432,431 The single largest cultural issue that has a direct correlation to widespread poverty in communities is a lack of fathers and positive male role models for that community. I dont know how to solve this and why black dads just aren't sticking around less than half as much as white ones Or less than 1/4 as much as asian ones but it should be the priority to solve.
mrkiscool2 wrote: » Thats nonsense. Why are these high crime communities mostly black? Why are the relatively safe Chicago neighbourhoods mostly white? Its because of everything I mentioned above. The lack of access to good primary and secondary education. The lack of good social programmes or hell, even a good social safety net. The lack of culture and the dilapidated placed they live because they or their families can't afford to live anywhere else. All of that is enough for gangs to entice young men to become gang members and either be murdered or jail for the promise of riches they will probably never see. Crime doesn't just happen..it takes massive inaction for it to happen at that scale.
AbusesToilets wrote: » Democrat too. There's a strong trend of urban areas with high crime rates being in majority Democrat districts. Folks like to criticize white communities for seeking to avoid or escape from Integrated neighborhoods, but fail to grasp that when your wealth is directly tied to property value, they are being put in a position where their financial interests are being threatened. Tied to that, you have school districts which are funded from property taxes, and it's a recipe for disaster. Who would want to stay in a situation where you're losing money because new neighbours moved in?
Eric Cartman wrote: » I dont know how to solve this and why black dads just aren't sticking around less than half as much as white ones Or less than 1/4 as much as asian ones but it should be the priority to solve.
DelaneyIn wrote: » It’s a majority black ran and populated city. Hard to blame whitey on all its issues. The majority of Chicago’s politicians, police and residents are black.
Danzy wrote: » One of the biggest legacies of BLM will be the wiping out of a generation of black owned businesses and service providers in black communities. The economic damage of that will take 20 years to recover from.
BattleCorp wrote: » Ah yeah, that'll happen if you keep rioting and burning down the place.
Danzy wrote: » Chicago has problems but the key difference is that the culture and values of the African American community are so toxic and self destructive.
mrkiscool2 wrote: » Parts of Chicago are so neglected they genuinely look like parts of war torn countries.
Danzy wrote: » Poverty is not confined to one group, urban mismanagement, failed educational systems etc also.
1800_Ladladlad wrote: » Im sorry, but how can anyone have faith in Mayor Lightfoot after this sh*te. the urban metropolis of Chicago is hardly well known for its cowboys or culture....
mrkiscool2 wrote: » Ah, yes. Because Chicago is a bastion of good social programs, good education, culture and amazing urban renewal. Parts of Chicago are so neglected they genuinely look like parts of war torn countries. What.a lot of activists are looking for in addition to less force by police officers are better education systems, a fairer spread of taxpayer money towards education, social programs and rejuvenation of the "ghettos" of the city.
Danzy wrote: » Known world wide for its gun fights. It's often pointed out but not appreciated by all how violent Black Chicagoans communities are. Near same rate of population as Cork County but heading for 700 shot dead this year and near 5000 Injured by shots. It's at such a scale that their should be armed National Guards in every corner block. It would save countless lives but in the very nice suburbs where the activists live the outrage would be enormous.
1800_Ladladlad wrote: » Im sorry, but how can anyone have faith in Mayor Lightfoot after this sh*te. the urban metropolis of Chicago is hardly well known for its cowboys or culture. It's hardly a shout out to their slaughter yards which makes no sense. and where the f*ck is batman, when is that batman going appear ......https://twitter.com/BethLynch2020/status/1282782087666438144
BarbBrooklyn wrote: » While I can't explain it as eloquently as others have, here's a simpler one... when you hear someone say "Save the rainforest", do you think they mean "**** all of the other trees"? When you see a bumper sticker that says "watch for motorcycles", do you think they mean "ignore everything else on the road"?
iamstop wrote: » Cornelius Fredericks. Black Live Matter.