A Tyrant Named Miltiades! wrote: » For arguments sake that's the equivalent of ten aunts, each having ten children... on both sides of the family (10^2) x 2 = 200 Is that possible? I must be missing something
beggars_bush wrote: » 40+ first cousins Don't really keep in contact with them. Randomly bump into them though
king_of_mayo wrote: » I don't really. I grew up away from them and then as you get older, you only see them at certain events. They're all still in contact with each other, live near-ish to each other. I think that's slightly unusual. Probably be different for kids nowadays with the smaller families. I have 20+ cousins, doubt youngsters today will have half that.
Signore Fancy Pants wrote: » Only after I ride 'em.
Sheridan81 wrote: » Nope. My cousin is Fergal Sharkey and he doesn't like me.
RandomViewer wrote: » pwurple wrote: » Almost 200 first cousins. I don't even know half of them, let alone speak to them. Average family size up to the eighties ,very possible
pwurple wrote: » Almost 200 first cousins. I don't even know half of them, let alone speak to them.
limerickabroad wrote: » ^^^^^^^ Under-rated post
Sheridan81 wrote: » Not many Undertone fans in the audience.:D