Ten of Swords wrote: » A significant number of posts have been deleted, this is the second (and final) reminder that this thread concerns the gender recognition legislation for children under 18. Any more posts conflating trans with pedophilia or mental illness, traveller rights, transgender prisoners, crime from people of a migrant background or any other off topic posting will earn an immediate card and threadban.
excludedbin wrote: » By calling for his hanging? Pull the other one. They were an angry mob whipped up by the usual anti-everything lot whose only mistake was loudly declaring their intentions by making heavy use of depicting nooses. Maybe you agree with them, because your defence of it is nothing short of baffling otherwise. It's not exactly something ambiguous, they were clearly there calling for his hanging. The fact that they were calling for the hanging of a gay, left wing politician because he's gay and left wing is what makes it fascist. He's not a paedophile, no matter how much they insist he is. Let the useless idiots present some evidence if they have it but if they did, you can be damn sure they would've by now. It's more bully-boy tactics by the far right, trying to threaten and intimidate a politician who won't kowtow to them. I'm glad O'Gorman is standing up and I only hope more people follow his example. Those scumbags have no place in Irish society.
Eric Cartman wrote: » I think such a person would have seen it as an anti-paedophile / anti child gender swapping demonstration . I think you need to look past your own views of the national party and see that despite who they are and what you (correctly ) think of them, that a lot of people went to that protest purely to speak out against the childrens minister, the bill he inherited and Peter tatchell. PbP hold anti homelessness demonstrations all the time, Brendan ogle's home sweet home / Apollo house thing etc.. were all directly branded by, funded by and headed up by absolute dyed in the wool marxists. Not everyone who went to those protests or donated would want to see the political Ireland those people would want, they wanted to raise awareness for the homeless, I agree that Barrett had political aims with that protest just as ogle or Paul Murphy did with theirs, it doesn't make the protest a 'fascist' one the same way every homeless march wasnt a socialist one.
AndrewJRenko wrote: » I've never seen anyone bring along professionally printed posters showing nooses at any demonstration that I've taken part in. Do you often see nooses at other posters that you take part in Eric? I'm still confused a bit by what you mean by 'anti-paedo' demonstration. For example, an anti-homelessness demonstration is normally calling on government to take action to eradicate homelessness. What is the objective of an 'anti-paedophile' demonstration? And what is the objective of an 'an anti child gender swapping' demonstration. Are you saying that transgender children don't exist, or should be locked up somewhere or what?
Eric Cartman wrote: » in the same way that 'black people are all good at basketball' is racist. In cases it might anecdotally present itself as true, and most professional basketball players are black , but to automatically assume any given black person is better at basketball than another race is a racial stereotype. In the same way that presuming white people are automatically not discriminated against / have advantages for being white is prejudiced and a stereotype. it is a trait specifically directed towards a singular race emphasising a difference purely based on race.
Eric Cartman wrote: » please explain where they called for the hanging of the minister, is there any sign with his name next to a noose, is there any inference that he is a paedophile - no. you've made something up to fit your narrative.
Eric Cartman wrote: » "tyrants get the rope" "eat the rich" "burn the bankers" , burning epitaphs of the pope at repeal rallies , lets not pretend a picture of a noose next to a sign saying 'punish paedophiles' is anything new in protest alarmism.
RWCNT wrote: » To suggest all black people are good at basketball is to suggest that they have certain characteristics by virtue of their race - a biological reality inherent regardless of societal context. White privilege is based around the idea that white people are less likely to face racism, not due to possessing some special set of characteristics, but simply by virtue of being the majority in a country. It's more a statement on society itself than about the traits of white people. I've lived in England for a good few years and have been unfortunate enough to have had the occasional disparaging comment made to me about my nationality. Surely you'd agree this is more likely to happen to me in a country where I'm the minority than where the majority share my nationality?
excludedbin wrote: » Well if you're at a point where you need me to guide your hand and join the dots of holding a banner and signs with nooses, and protesting outside the Dáil in the immediate aftermath of the controversy surrounding O'Gorman while claiming it's "anti paedophilia"... You're either beyond my ability to help or you support them. I'm guessing it's more the latter. The banner literally said "punish the guilty". And had a picture of a noose on it. And they were outside the Dáil. After the same loopers were pushing the idea that O'Gorman is a paedophile. I'm kind of absolutely astonished that you actually think anyone would be stupid or gullible enough to believe their purpose was anything other than to call for his hanging.
Eric Cartman wrote: » ok, but what proportion of the world is white , should white priviledge not be refined to 'white priviledge in most of North America and most of europe' because it certainly doesn't exist in South America, Asia, Africa, the Middle East' If I go to Senegal tomorrow I have no privilege whatsoever, I will be discriminated against, far worse than somebody from Senegal would be in Ireland. However for some reason me being able to walk around less than half the earth and not endure any discrimination based on being white deserves its own term. Are there white people in Senegal petitioning schools to teach kids about black privilege ?
Eric Cartman wrote: » one quote, give me one quote where that is even heavily implied by even the most fruit loopy one of them.
AndrewJRenko wrote: » How about this one quote;https://twitter.com/irishciara27/status/1280070075962310656?s=20 'Burn the Bondholders' referred to the bondholders losing their bonds, their money. It didn't refer to arson. There was no 'get the rope' or burning of any effigies at repeal rallies. That's just your own little fantasy.
excludedbin wrote: » Well here's some more:https://twitter.com/LOCthedreamer1/status/1283478029470183430https://twitter.com/IrexitFreedom/status/1281986124890742785 "We sent a clear message to @rodericogorman"https://twitter.com/Redhead63975379/status/1280216265047576576https://twitter.com/Grange09991182/status/1283467509107175424 "championing of a paedophile activist"https://twitter.com/EmmetCilldara/status/1280839548491255812https://twitter.com/johnconnors1990/status/1279791132201885703 John Connors was at the march, too.https://twitter.com/firinnemedia/status/1281946674282274817 Another one who was at the march. Shall I go on?
Eric Cartman wrote: » "minister's links to a paedophile apologist" "associating with a paedophile apologist" are true and are not calling the minister a paedophile.
Eric Cartman wrote: » you really had to dig very deep to find that tweet, clearly a bot account set up in march to reblog mad stuff. Nothing from anyone at the march though no ?
castle2012 wrote: » Here is another post. Disgraceful encouraging violence a só called children's minister
AndrewJRenko wrote: » Is that really the best you got? A ten year old out-of-context reply?
castle2012 wrote: » Males encouraging volience against female's never acceptable. Any person who even trys to justice should be barred from boards.ie
drunkmonkey wrote: » The expert group behind this policy besides Sara Philips as we already know she's met Tatchell who else could be on Mattie McGraths radar.
excludedbin wrote: » For some reason the person he responded to deleted their tweet but this is what I found when I looked for it: Doesn't add that much more context to it, though. However: https://twitter.com/rodericogorman/status/88380883152801792 So, with that in mind, more than likely it's a joke considering she was hardly the one to have stolen it and obviously O'Gorman knows that. Honestly, the depths our homophobic twerps are sinking to now are nothing short of pathetic. Also I can't believe I wasted my time on this tonight. I demand fair compensation!
