antodeco wrote: » Can we not just stick this in an a high interest account and get a few more Bob from it?
A Tyrant Named Miltiades! wrote: » Even though we were never really going to get much, I kinda wish the Government win on appeal. Otherwise we're going to keep hearing for decades about how the Government gave away 13 billion euro of our money. The Shell2Sea of our days.
Shefwedfan wrote: » Excellent news
L1011 wrote: » High interest accounts don't exist anymore. It costs you money to deposit that volume of cash. And indeed that's what's happening - its losing a few million a year.
murpho999 wrote: » There was €1bn interest going on top of the €13bn.
A Tyrant Named Miltiades! wrote: » Even though we were never really going to get much, I kinda wish the Government win on appeal. Otherwise we're going to keep hearing for decades about how the Government gave away 13 billion euro of our money. The Shell2Sea of our days. Somewhere, Paul Murphy is picking up a megaphone.
murpho999 wrote: » I don't think you get this case as the government has won and are not collecting the tax.
A Tyrant Named Miltiades! wrote: » Even though we were never really going to get much, I kinda wish the Government win on appeal.
A Tyrant Named Miltiades! wrote: » Of course, sorry my mind is still having difficulty with reflexively associating 13 billion with losing. .
Snickers Man wrote: » Are we clear?
Wanderer78 wrote: » people must like paying more taxes, if theyre not paying them, you are!
When Ireland changed its tax laws in 2015, Apple made changes to its corporate structure to comply. Since then, all of Apple’s Irish operations have been conducted through Irish resident companies. Apple pays tax at Ireland’s statutory 12.5 percent.
A Tyrant Named Miltiades! wrote: » So we lost,..., did we loose?
sydthebeat wrote: » how simple a view.... apple paid their full 12.5% corporation tax as required.https://www.apple.com/ie/newsroom/2017/11/the-facts-about-apple-tax-payments/
Wanderer78 wrote: » its rare that mnc's pay the full 12.5%, its more commonly 10/11%, again, if theyre not paying it, you are
sydthebeat wrote: » no. they pay 12.5% if they can make back legal allowances on it, so be it... same rule for all in ireland which is EXACTLY what the court said today, that apple didnt get any sweetheart deal
Shefwedfan wrote: » How much tax would you be paying if the MNC move out and the half the country is suddenly on the socail welfare? The tax generated by these companies are the only reason Ireland is even anywhere close to recovered from the crash. Without them the place would be a ghost town Its not just the people working for these companies, the farms supplying the canteens, the companies providing security and maintenance, gardeners etc When Dell closed in Limerick it wasnt just the people in Dell who lost jobs, it was the entire community
is_that_so wrote: » Not too surprised. It looked as it has done from the start like something of a vendetta against tech companies and God knows they've played fast and loose. Vindication for Apple and the government/Revenue. At the very least it might remind them of their tax obligations.
Wanderer78 wrote: » again, full 12.5 is rare, its generally 10/11. on another note, i worked for an mnc for a while, in its 40 years of operations here, it has never turned a profit, i ll let that sink in!
sydthebeat wrote: » like i said, it may be able to claim back legal allowance, but so are all companies in ireland... the basic rate is paid... and allowances are claimed back. whether that means they pay an effective rate of 10 / 11% or whatever is immaterial.... even the most basic individual in this country is allowed to do the same in their own tax circumstances.
Wanderer78 wrote: » again, since theyre not paying it, you are!
sydthebeat wrote: » if you claim back tax on tuition fees then you dont pay it..... i do.... if I claim back tax on dental fees then I dont pay it..... you do.... same principle ..... only on a different level..... are you saying apple should have some special tax arrangement where they cannot avail of legal allowances?? i wonder where that viewpoint would bring us.
Wanderer78 wrote: » taxation is deeply imbalanced, its now at dangerous levels, if we continue on this path, it will more than likely lead to further destabilization politically, economically, socially and environmentally. the more plutocratic elements in society are walking away with the spoils of your labour, and the risks and requirement of taxation is landing on your lap, this is unsustainable, tax harmonization is probably required in the eu at this stage
A Tyrant Named Miltiades! wrote: » Just to be clear here, this is like the Scissor Sisters walking free from court: ourselves and Apple, we're like Linda and Charlotte. This is a legal vindication, and while it's probably even true to say that Ireland's 1991 Tax Ruling did not amount to state aid, we absolutely did conspire with MNCs to avail of a lacuna in US Tax Law where they were allowed to be tax-resident in no jurisdiction. We just didn't do it on a selective basis which would have amounted to state aid. The law is on our side, but lets not start doing moral victory laps. We were letting large multinationals avoid their tax obligations for years.