JCX BXC wrote: » Why do we choose not to incentivise public transport/walking/cycling, but rather to make car access more difficult and force people to these means? The same tactics are used for most problems here, alcohol and tobacco, simply tax and ban. It's not an effective solution.
blueshark2 wrote: » Replacing a small proportion of the car parking spaces with new cycling infrastructure IS incentivising cycling. Ideally it would be done with no loss of parking but there's limited space and something has to give.
blueshark2 wrote: » I know that, but you can't say they're not provided for. A huge area of public space in Galway City is dedicated to cars. Put in an extra 500 spaces and more people will see driving to Salthill as the preferable option as there's more easy parking and as the roads are even busier with cars it's unsafe to cycle with a family. Continuing to feed the car demand is a vicious cycle. The more cars are catered for the less hospitable the roads and community spaces are for more sustainable options. We definitely do need to cater for those with reduced mobility though. Vast amounts of that main car park should be reserved for elderly, blue badge holders and families with small children. Some additional parking should be reserved for elderly and blue badge holders near Blackrock. There are some options that could be looked at - like do we need the wide footpath in front of the apartments opposite Blackrock? You could create 10 spots there for elderly swimmers.
Johnny_BravoIII wrote: » I We have no alternative means to transport people to Salthill. There is no public transport worth talking about for people outside of a bike ride to Salthill.
Johnny_BravoIII wrote: » You are saying close Salthill to all non-Salthill people, because less cars would be great because I don't like cars.
Johnny_BravoIII wrote: » What about the 100's of regular prom users from the wider county and regional areas. Whats your message to them?
Johnny_BravoIII wrote: » My point is first we need massive investment in public transport, second we need car reduction measures or we lose the battle politically
[Deleted User] wrote: » Just because you want to have a stroll by the seaside doesn't mean you need a parking space beside it
[Deleted User] wrote: » Bus, walk, cycle Just because you want to have a stroll by the seaside doesn't mean you need a parking space beside it Where was that stated? By who? Or did you misunderstand something? What's your message for the children who would like to cycle in safety? Providing several hundred free parking spaces instead of using the space for safe, protected cycling infrastructure is a car reduction measure?
Money is available to provide a temporary cycle lane in Salthill under Covid 19 safety guidelines. Having consulted with Salthill Village business interests the Chief Executive is not now going to apply for this money or provide any cycle lane in Salthill this year, it had been proposed from the Wolfe Tone Bridge to BlackRock. I seconded a motion proposed by Cllr Collette Connolly to review this and apply for the money and come up with a new bike lane plan. This was defeated 12/5 , yes 12 Councillors voted not to trial a Salthill cyclelane after one short meeting with local business. I despair of there being any will to keep children and adults safe while trying to cycle in Salthill.
........ yes it was a role call vote Cllrs,Collette Connolly, Niall Murphy, Owen Hanley, Mayor Mike Cubbard and I voted to review the decision to scrap trialling a cycle lane. One abstained and all other 12 voted against. The CE will progress permanent cyclelane in the future .
flazio wrote: » The people of the rural county shouldn't need to rely on the city so heavily. The towns of Loughrea, Tuam, Athenry, Ballinasloe, Spiddal, Gort, etc are dying a death. Galway city doesn't need to accommodate every car in the county. It doesn't owe it to the county. That's madness.
Mrs OBumble wrote: » Salthill has been like Bundoran on downers for years. A two-wheeler lane won't fix that.
Jazmin Harsh Gold wrote: » They are representing the views of the majority of people and businesses as they should.
jammiedodgers wrote: » Regardless of any opinion on the cycle lane, lets not pretend this u-turn was for the benefit of the ordinary citizen. Local businesses were afraid they would lose money and gave the councillors a bollicking.
ratracer wrote: » Why not try make it a pleasant destination place to go???
Jazmin Harsh Gold wrote: » It is a pleasant place to go, nonsense statements like “abandoned metal boxes” just make you look silly. Parked cars in no way take from the area, or the pleasure of a walk along the prom or grabbing a bit of lunch in one of the cafes etc. Without parking most people can’t get there either which you need to remember, so take it away and it’s not really a feasible destination for most.
thebackbar wrote: » Was the council planning on taking away all of the parking spaces in Salthill ? or the figure i heard which was 12% of parking spaces ? Anyone know the true figure ? Is there any economic data showing how introducing a greenway is bad for business ?
ratracer wrote: » I stand by my description, and if you think cars abandonded on the footpath, or obstructing vision at junctions and lights as is the norm in Salthill, is acceptable, well good for you!! As I posted previously, all of Salthill should be made a pay and display parking area, then everyone wins, don’t they? You can drive there, city council can ring fence the parking fees for development of amenities in the area. And BTW, this is a view I hold as a motorist!
Jazmin Harsh Gold wrote: » Its more parking needed in the area not less as I've pointed out already it can be hard to get a spot close to the cafes etc at times even in off season midweek. Pay and display? no way - drivers already pay for too much, pay parking can feck right off.
thebackbar wrote: » Is there any examples you could point to where a cycleway has been bad for business ?? just one Whats your definition of close to the cafes ? a one minute walk, five minute, ten minute ? The current plan for Galway is for the population to double in next twenty years, if this projection comes true then it won't be feasible to facilitate everyone parking a minutes walk from the cafes in Salthill.
ratracer wrote: » I stand by my description, and if you think cars abandonded on the footpath, or obstructing vision at junctions and lights as is the norm in Salthill, is acceptable, well good for you!! As I posted previously, all of Salthill should be made a pay and display parking area, then everyone wins, don’t they? You can drive there, city council can ring fence the parking fees for development of amenities in the area.And BTW, this is a view I hold as a motorist!
thebackbar wrote: » Whats your definition of close to the cafes ? a one minute walk, five minute, ten minute ? The current plan for Galway is for the population to double in next twenty years, if this projection comes true then it won't be feasible to facilitate everyone parking a minutes walk from the cafes in Salthill.