Brian Hartman wrote: » Either you're far better looking than you think, or the girls on Tinder have become much more shallow. I used to do quite well in real life but never had any luck online.
[Deleted User] wrote: » Was out tonight and my friend's girlfriend insisted on me joining it since I'm single since last year. A shlte photo, no bio, nothing. She took the phone and went wild. How does it even all work? I have a notification already about some Like that is asking me to pay money every month to see who likes me. Seems pretty absurd. She swiped on everything for the craic and started a conversation with some girl as well who I am guessing isn't even real. I genuinely don't know anything about this. Some of my friends get the ride out of it but is it worth pursuing for something more serious?
gilberto_eire wrote: » There has definitely been a shift in how women are using it. It's full of girls who are absolute stunners. Their pictures show an active social life. Which means between the countless men asking them on dates when they're on nights out, they're getting 100s of messages a week. When you see lots of these same girls there over a year later you start to wonder as they are getting their pick of 100s of men. These things originally were used by people who had very few social circles to meet or of lesser looks. They're just overtaken by Love Island hopefuls looking to spread their IG and SC usernames.
mick087 wrote: » Its a dating app people use it to meet for dates and form relationships. I hear people talking about this and plenty in fish and bumble. I guess its the way folk meet these days, the days of asking for a slow dance at the end of the night have gone
Brian Hartman wrote: » There are far more men on dating sites than women, women only rate the top 20% of men as attractive...these are not good odds for the aspiring player. Go out and meet women irl. Or go to Asia and just be white.[/QUOTE Looking at a lot of youtube vlogs from fellas who've went to Thailand 'to work' and managed to get hitched to local stunners. Way to go for average 50s white guy i think lol
SusieBlue wrote: » I met my ex of 4 years on tinder. Whether you are looking for something serious or more casual, you will find it there. It isn’t just for hook ups or for the ultra good looking people at all.
riclad wrote: » Even rich and famous people use them
Actress Sharon Stone says she was blocked from the dating app Bumble. The online platform said there had been several reports of a fake profile, the 62-year-old posted on Twitter.
Church on Tuesday wrote: » I'm guessing you are a woman? Yes, for some people it's grand, for the vast majority it's a waste of time. A person is far better dating in real life IMO. It depends what you are looking to get out of it.
[Deleted User] wrote: » Tinder c.2013-15 was some of my best times on the internet. It was like Marco Polo wandering the Silk Road.
[Deleted User] wrote: » What changed?
Limpy wrote: » On a scale of 1 to 10 how close are the women to there profile pictures, looks wise?
unhappys10 wrote: » It varies, some are the same, some are nothing alike and anything in between. I met one girl on it, between her and her photos there was a difference of about 10 years and 10 stone* Needless to say I made a quick escape. *10 stone may be a slight exaggeration.
JustAThought wrote: » Filters and photoshop apps don’t help with the truth either!! Any pic taken from above is going to take a lot of fat off a face and should be taken with a large dose of salts!!
B.A._Baracus wrote: » Tinder, pof and what not are great for woman - lots of attention and mails. Downside is you get a lot of guys looking for sex etc. The aforementioned apps and sites are horrible for men. Like all these things are 80% (even more?) populated by men. Average guy can send out 50 messages and be lucky to get one mail. Yes there are success stories but they are in the minority. See on paper dating sites shouldn't make money when you think about it. As if it was easy to meet somebody there wouldn't be as many returning users (those who genuinely want relationships as they get involved) and you wouldn't be paying the site for more messages (for those looking for hook ups) See years ago dating websites like another friend had a membership only to send messages. Make their money up front. It was uncharted territory back then. Some websites still have that modal but the major ones like tinder, pof etc offer you free messages and likes. Because they can dangle the carrot of "meeting someone" - they're just around the corner you just need to send out more messages etc. So that premium package looks tempting. It's all balls tho :pac: But you can understand their business modal because, as said above, if it was so easy to get a date or sex they'd be closed shops. Membership only. Pay before you click send. It's not that tho. ... Cause 80% are blokes lol... Not to mention the baggage of people ... The weirdos ... The window shoppers... The ego boosters. Etc.