Deleted User wrote: » There is some demand for the jobs among local people... Just as there were jobs in the gutting of fish, or any number of similar jobs which don't require much skill, but also don't have much in the way of a profit for the people involved. I really have no idea why you're objecting to what I said, since what I said, was suitable to the examples I gave. ie. work that becomes less visible due to increases in the minimum wage. It's not that the work disappears completely.
Brian Hartman wrote: » For those of you who want immigration, how do you propose keeping the dangerous migrants out? The terrorists, violent criminals etc?
mick087 wrote: » If you want full control of the borders then your talking about leaving the EU. Immigration is not perfect i agree.
mick087 wrote: » Al jobs require some sort of skill and anyone who does any job should be given respect and fair decent living wage. The turf work didnt become less because of the minimum wage it became less because the EU has laws on Turf ie Banning and cutting down.
Wibbs wrote: » I have no issue with inward EU migration. I do have an issue with illegal and non refugee migration from non EU regions.
Deleted User wrote: » You're arguing with yourself, introducing your own problems to resolve.... And... not really paying attention to what I wrote with regards to both the original post, and my responses. Utterly bizarre.
mick087 wrote: » I suspect our problem with illegals is low compared to the rest of The EU and UK.
TomTomTim wrote: » We have a massive problem. From my understanding, we deport very few of the many who get rejected from the asylum process, which is essentially thousands of people.
mick087 wrote: » I did not comment on your post, you commemed on one of my posts i made to another forum member. I then in turn replied to your comment you made to me.
Deleted User wrote: » Original post. My original post to you. Duh. Good lord.
mick087 wrote: » Some basic common manners seems to be missing. I admit maybe i got mixed up in my jumpers but its there is no excuse for Duh. I can now well imagine the respect you would show workers on the minimum wage if this is your behaviour towards another on a forum.
Deleted User wrote: » haha. you think my reaction to your posts suggests how I would react to minimum wage earners? Hilarious. No, truly. I'm in the absolute giggles that you would even make such a suggestion. As for there being no excuse, you misinterpreted my posts, and accused me of misunderstanding yours.. and you accused me of not knowing what I was talking about... so... common manners? yeah. look to your own behavior first.
mick087 wrote: » Im suggesting nothing im stating by your posts. No excuse, rubbish mistakes are made by everyone. Again your proving how you would treat people.
Deleted User wrote: » Enough said.
joe40 wrote: » My own view is multi culturalism can be a benefit, but must be in an economically viable way. I would welcome people from other cultures with the skills and work ethic to benefit our country.
Sand wrote: » There is three problems with that attitude: 1 - Ireland is the only homeland the Irish people have. Its a country, not a football team or a corporation trying to recruit the best staff. Multiculturalism is never a benefit. 2 - Similar attitudes (hardworking immigrants, benefits to the country etc) were pursued throughout Europe and the USA. Look where they are now with race riots and constant ethnic conflict. We have to learn from others mistakes, not repeat them. 3 - Even if all non-EU immigrants were smart, hardworking and ambitious you are simultaneously denying their talents to their own homelands (which invested to produce them) and denying Irish people the opportunity to take those roles that were opened. EU corporations operate behind trade barriers and regulations which protect them from cheap competition, but Irish workers have to complete tooth and claw with the third world? That is a rigged system.
joe40 wrote: » So presumably you're equally opposed to Irish people emmigrating to other countries. Taking over the homeland of another people Irish people causing racial tensions in other countries Irish students not staying in Ireland thereby depriving Ireland of their skills and Education.
Sand wrote: » The migration policies of non-EU countries is the primary concern of those countries. But I would be consistent if it was my concern.
joe40 wrote: » So a country like Australia should not allow Irish emmigrants. What Australians emmigrating to Ireland.
joe40 wrote: » So presumably you're equally opposed to Irish people emmigrating to other countries. Taking over the homeland of another people ????When and where have the Irish taken over the homeland of another people? Irish people causing racial tensions in other countries ????Again when and where? Irish students not staying in Ireland thereby depriving Ireland of their skills and Education.
jmreire wrote: » That's one valid point all right. But we can and have been managing for a long time now like this, much better in fact than poorer non-EU Country's can do when the cream of their educated people leave...
joe40 wrote: » The "taking over the homeland point" was in relation to the posters assertion that immigrants here take over our homeland. I don't believe Irish people do take over another countries homeland when they emmigrate.
Sand wrote: » That is up to Australians to determine. It's not my concern. I honestly don't care if Irish people cant emigrate to Australia. I'd note that the Irish and Australians are both European ethnic groups, so multiculturalism wont endure past the first generation. Third at worst. So the reference to Australia simply isnt relevant to a discussion about multiculturalism where non-European groups cant/wont assimilate with European groups in a generation or two.
Sand wrote: » Can you quote that assertion?
joe40 wrote: » "Ireland is the only homeland the Irish people have"