westgolf wrote: » Approx 40 year old picture.
xckjoo wrote: » This isn't aimed at anyone in particular, but I wonder if the people that cry discrimination against the elderly/disabled also make the effort to minimise car usage so that there's more room on the road and more parking spots close to where they need them
?Cee?view wrote: » When has the amount that's been given under the cycle to work last been looked at?
?Cee?view wrote: » And I suppose that's the challenge with all these changes. The difficulty is balancing incentives and disincentives. At this stage in Galway, all that is being proposed to move car drivers away is disincentives. Take car parking spaces, take road space etc. Why not positively encourage e.g. car pooling? Seamus Quirke Road - you'd hardly ever see a bus. Why not allow cars with >4 in them use the bus lanes for instance?
?Cee?view wrote: » Then the encouragement to cycle. That needs joined up thinking. What use is offering cycle to work, if employers aren't given a tax break (or something) to provide showers or changing facilities. When has the amount that's been given under the cycle to work last been looked at?
?Cee?view wrote: » The only thinking seems to be to pit different road users against each other, by taking from one group and giving to the other. A bit more imagination, less silo thinking and the banning of "high horses" (if not real horses!), would be positive.
zell12 wrote: » A very very long lockdown
flazio wrote: » Covid won't last forever, a vaccine is coming. It might not turn up this side of Christmas, but it will come.
?Cee?view wrote: » Such a ridiculous comment. Many people come from a distance to walk next to the sea. You must know this, or are you just trolling? Are people from outside walking or cycling distance of the prom now not welcome?
Jazmin Harsh Gold wrote: » I’m not sure what traffic is like in the city as I haven’t been in since early March as I’m working from home full time but I would assume even now it’s lighter than before and at this stage anyone who needs to be at work is likely already back.
blueshark2 wrote: » It's pretty heavy, but not yet the gridlock state that we often had before.
Jazmin Harsh Gold wrote: » I’m not sure what traffic is like in the city as I haven’t been in since early March as I’m working from home full time
[Deleted User] wrote: » Not a million miles away from returning to pre-covid levels of grid lock according to the traffic monitor on the N6 24hr average Avg for rush hours morning & eveningData source
Mrs OBumble wrote: » That kinda supports Nox point though: I've been on public transport just after 9am and 6:30pm, and its vastly quieter still. If we found ways for those people to work at home, or within walking distance of home, traffic could be lighter still.
Jazmin Harsh Gold wrote: » The government need to either carrot this with incentives for employers or stick it with ways to increase the cost to employers by having unnecessary people in the office - a combination of both being the best approach.
[Deleted User] wrote: » As for walking distance from work to home, the same applies for cycling distance from work to home. Personally I'm looking at a 20km commute and have showers in my work. As a result I'm looking at cycling once I return to work and am building up to 50km a day at the moment in preparation. However, my 20km commute is 25km when cycling due to trying to avoid the more dangerous roads. Sucks but makes my commuting a nice round 50km cycle a day.
FitzShane wrote: » Like increasing the cost of parking and/or reducing the number of free parking spots at offices to move people to public transport and/or cycling and walking?
[Deleted User] wrote: » From this weeks Advertiser, plenty about the new and upcoming prioritization of pedestrians and cyclists ahead of the private car And for anyone free this Sat and looking to go for a spin on the bike, check out the cycle bus summer spins