Deleted User wrote: » Cross street now closed to through traffic yay!https://twitter.com/OwenHanleyLives/status/1280098751026204672?s=20 Middle Street next hopefully
Mrs OBumble wrote: » Creating Galway's version of Dame Lane. Great. Middle Street residents must be delighted with the idea.
Deleted User wrote: » Cross st is a temp change at first, to be reviewed and decision to be determined later Eglington St & Francis st will have temp measures implemented with a view to permanent measures to follow at a later date (bus gates, new pedestrian & cycling infrastructure, street furniture etc). This falls under the GTS so was always going to happen, just they have moved things forward
CowboyTed wrote: » Cross St... Good Idea making temp to start... Try stuff out before we lock in... Before even starting I could never understand parking on Ellington St. I have various thoughts about Ellington St., if you make it fully Predsetrian, it could become a market area but I think the city would really be enhanced by a English Market type facility (very common on continent and really attracts footfall)...
The Cross-City Link consists of a central corridor traversing the core city area, which will be restricted to use by public transport vechiles, pedestrians, cyclists and local access only. It will enable efficent and reliable public transport to and through the city center from University Road, across Salmon Weir Bridge, along Eglinton Street, around Eyre Square and along Forester Street and College Road.
gordongekko wrote: » No sign of our cycling loving " the council are useless/corrupt/disgrace" element giving a bit of praise to them for this action.
westgolf wrote: » By using middle street and lower Abbeygate street to access Augustine street..?
Deleted User wrote: » It wont be fully pedestrainised but will be closed to private cars. Only buses, cyclists and pedestrians will be allowed down it. Not sure about taxis. I think they will be allowed, but not sure. I'm guessing Woodquay will eventually be pedestrianised and markets etc added there It forms part of the "Cross-City Link" route. This link route, combined with the existing bus lanes, below, should see HUGE improvements in the travel times, frequency and reliability of bus routes around Galway city. Simply put, its frikkin awesome if you are a pedestrian, cyclist, bus or taxi user. That being said, the bus priority network will still need a lot of work following this to add similar priority measures to other routes, not just those using Seamus Quirke & Dublin roads
CowboyTed wrote: » The way I look at it... Trial it... Should not be permanent unless a major increase in PT/cycling usage...
CowboyTed wrote: » Here is a question... Has Bus routes and timetables been beefed up to be able to take this traffic...
CowboyTed wrote: » Is there one bus to get on to in Knocknacarra and stay on and arrive in Ballybrit or parkmore?
CowboyTed wrote: » Will this make bus lanes carry more people than car lanes in peak hours?
Only 10% of Galway City’s roads are dedicated bus lanes, which is causing a “serious deterioration” in Bus Éireann’s ability to fulfil its timetables. Regional Manager Brian Connolly said that the company had become a victim of its own success – it was now increasingly unable to meet a growing demand, as the necessary infrastructure is not being provided. “There are constant improvements coming into the network but, without priority measures, we are in danger of just having an increased level of resources caught up in the same traffic,” he said.
CowboyTed wrote: » I wish the answer is YES to all these. This would mean a improvement in the quality of life of Galway people but taking these roads and not using them properly is a waste. At the moment Westside's extra lane is a waste, hopefully this makes this better. The cycle lanes from Knocknacarra and Ballybrit would carry more if a car lane... Just look at the usage any fine morning never mind bad morning
Laviski wrote: » city direct still refusing to restarting their services, BE should have taken their routes by now.
Mrs OBumble wrote: » Are you looking forward to seeing coffins rolled down Buttermilk Walk to get into the church? All so some private business can use the public road to get richer by selling unhealthy food and taxis substances to people?
Galway Bay fm newsroom – City officials have been urged to lead a full and detailed consultation with members of the Salthill Village committee over plans to introduce cycle lanes at the Prom. The measure is being proposed on a temporary basis by the city mobility team in a bid to encourage cycling as part of the response to the COVID 19 pandemic. Local area councillors met with Salthill traders on Sunday to discus their concerns over the resulting loss of an estimated 260 parking spaces along the Prom and at Seapoint. At a meeting of the city council, Fianna Fail councillor Peter Keane passed a motion calling for consultation with the Salthill village committee. He told Galway Talks that while local councillors support cycling infrastructure, it cannot be at the cost of local business at a time when many are struggling to keep their doors open. He says options need to be discussed if a compromise is to be reached…
blueshark2 wrote: » "City officials urged to consult with Salthill traders over plan for cycling paths at Prom"https://galwaybayfm.ie/galway-bay-fm-news-desk/city-officials-urged-to-consult-with-salthill-traders-over-plan-for-cycling-paths-at-prom/ Some of the old-school businesses in Salthill must think that a reduction in car parking spots will reduce their business. I think they could be shooting themselves in the foot if they delay the cycle lane rollout, I'd say Salthill will absolutely thrive as a seaside village with a cycle lane connected to the city. It will become a "to do" thing for city tourists, rent a bike a visit Salthill. A lot of Galway's big student population have bikes and no cars, they don't venture out to Salthill as much as they could. It'll allow potential for much more people to stop at Salthill. If they keep car-focused their limited by parking near the village. Try it for a while, if the road side parking is badly missed then mark the prom one-way for motorists, reinstate parking in the spare lane and maintain the cycle lane.
Deleted User wrote: » BTW, you REALLY should have a read of the GTS document located here
Deleted User wrote: » The video below is of the street in Paris, 2012 vs 2020 after the massive rollout of cycling infrastructure across the city. It not Galway, true, but it does highlight several things that are relevant to the past number of pages and illustrates very well what happens when a city prioritises people over cars 1. More people cycling = less people driving cars = less actual traffic = better driving experience for those with no other option 2. Vastly higher throughput capacityhttps://twitter.com/Jamesdestafford/status/1278735426312945664?s=19 Additional benefits not obvious from the video 3. Health benefits 4. More people = more customers for businesses 5. More predictable commute for all commuters due to reduced traffic 6. Cycling commuters = HUNGRY commuters = lots of busy cafes and restaurants 7. Less pollution All this comes about from providing protected infrastructure. IMHO It's a no brainer really
blueshark2 wrote: » "City officials urged to consult with Salthill traders over plan for cycling paths at Prom"https://galwaybayfm.ie/galway-bay-fm-news-desk/city-officials-urged-to-consult-with-salthill-traders-over-plan-for-cycling-paths-at-prom/ Some of the old-school businesses in Salthill must think that a reduction in car parking spots will reduce their business..
CowboyTed wrote: » You know a lot of people from rural areas around the city drive into the city to walk the prom... Peter Keane is right to ask why hasn't everyone been considered... Again I say trail anything and see and see what happens..
CowboyTed wrote: » I have read it and I also read the one that came out in 2009 which said we will have 20% cycling and 20% Pub Transport by this stage... Sorry. But I am asking for results... Saying built it and it will come didn't have work in 2009 plan.
Jazmin Harsh Gold wrote: » It will most certainly cause them to lose business. I drive to salthill for lunch fairly regularly, if I can’t easily park I won’t go. I usually meet others there (or go with others from work), if they can’t park they won’t go. I live rurally and it is common both in my family and for others to drive into the city just to walk the prom, often people would get a coffee maybe eat something etc when there. People are going to drive 40 mins or more to struggle to get perking - so more business lost etc etc.
blueshark2 wrote: » Do you have a link to the 2009 plan? Or title/reference, trying to search for it here. Is there any chance the targets were based on proposed changes that didn't happen?
xckjoo wrote: » The section you're referring to is discussing the National Policy and Guidelines and specifically the "Smarter Travel - A Sustainable Transport Future" policy document from 2009. It's got nothing to do with any local plans beyond national policy dictates (dictated?) that we should be seeking to achieve the 5 key goals and 6 targets it summarises on those pages.
Johnny_BravoIII wrote: » It would lead to more cyclists, who have wallets too.
blueshark2 wrote: » Plus cyclists can have a pint with their dinner and (legally) cycle home.