Noxegon wrote: » I think there are also some people that take the view that if you can't beat them, join them. I've been ridiculously careful over the last few months – and continue to be – yet when I see footage of the carry-on in central Dublin over the weekend it makes me wonder why I'm bothering. Just a thought.
Noxegon wrote: » I don't disagree with anything you're saying. What I am saying is that "if others are not doing it, then why should I" is a real thing. The government's fence-sitting on this is reprehensible IMHO. "Don't fly, but if you choose not to the financial hit is on you" is a poor way to convince the chattering classes.
SimonTemplar wrote: » For various reasons, international travel has to resume because a short term measure like a wholesale restriction on travel isn't sustainable for the long term. The green list, which is revised regularly, seems to be the best approach. I just find it hard to believe that if Ireland's current approach is correct, that means that the other EU countries that have opened to travel (and the ECDC for not recommending travel restrictions) are incorrect. I can't see how all those other countries and the ECDC would be that foolhardy.
dfx- wrote: » Nationwide lockdowns (sledgehammers to crack nuts) are not the long term solution to the virus. If anything Galicia, Leicester, Melbourne and the German one recently show the way forward. Nobody closed down countries.
bk wrote: » Except they tried that in Italy back in March, first locking down just a few towns and then the wider area around Milan. It didn't work and it spread all across Italy and Europe. My other half had flights to Milan around then, the Italian authorities and Irish airlines were telling us all how safe it was to travel there then, they had it contained. Yeah, we all know how well that worked out..... Hopefully regional lockdowns will be more successful now, with better testing. But I'd take the above examples very cautiously, we will have to wait and see if they work.
Nijmegen wrote: » Why are continued restrictions not sustainable, though? Cargo is travelling. Essential workers are travelling. What our public health officials are saying is, "Don't take non essential travel" like holidays. Why is that position unsustainable? Unpalatable, I get, but unsustainable? And I think that Ireland is lagging behind other countries by a few weeks. And I don't think there's anything much wrong with that to be honest. We benefited from being a few weeks behind at the start of all of this (by luck, probably) and the same could be said of now. Let someone else be among the first wave to hit the beaches on the proverbial D-Day, get the glory if it goes well, and you stroll up the beach then afterward.
dfx- wrote: » March isn't a valid comparison, the virus was long since embedded by then and community transmission was already out of control. It's not comparable to the measures and preparedness that should be in place now.
bk wrote: » Except they tried that in Italy back in March, first locking down just a few towns and then the wider area around Milan. It didn't work and it spread all across Italy and Europe.
bk wrote: » Except they tried that in Italy back in March, first locking down just a few towns and then the wider area around Milan. It didn't work and it spread all across Italy and Europe...
Jack1985 wrote: » Car crash interview, the fact this ape has a voice at cabinet spouting off statements without any facts is truly shocking. Absoloutely no idea the percentages of those who book direct, versus through package holidays.
bk wrote: » What exactly is wrong with that. I would agree with his stance, anyone who booked a flight in the past 6 months should have their head examined.
Jack1985 wrote: » Here's NPHET 6 months ago for you to have a good read of (late January it was established so actually less than 6 months ago);https://assets.gov.ie/68996/8ff1246d8b8c46208a143a7f75e6fbf4.pdf The risk was ''low'' however the disease was already in Europe unbeknownst to most. Nobody in Europe or Ireland knew what lay ahead in January 2020. Maybe you should have your own head examined.
Podge_irl wrote: » Ireland is definitely an outlier in its conservatism towards opening up. That may well prove to be prudent but I think people are being a bit overzealous in their criticism of those who question the advice. You don't need to be an expert in epidemiology to see that Ireland it out of kilter with the rest of Western Europe.
Beersmith wrote: » Surely not many did book from March on. Maybe people book their summer holidays December/January
Blut2 wrote: » Thats the thing - I don't think anyone (or anyone sane at least) is arguing that Ireland should be following the reckless/incompetent behaviour of the US or Brazil for example. Fully opened up, no restrictions, whatever. But instead more and more people are wondering why we aren't following the very successful, very logical, behaviour of countries like Denmark or Germany. The people defending current Irish governmental policy love to point at the US and say - "look at what not being overly conservative gets us!". But a much fairer comparison would be to look at our neighbours in sensibly governed Europe.
bk wrote: » From what I've seen on other (non-aviation) forums, the majority of people seem to want us to lock down more, not open up. In fact there have been multiple threads over on r/ireland about tourists from US and UK coming here and people are pretty outraged. So much so that lots of them are writing to TD's asking them to put more stringent measures in place. Outside of the bubble of the aviation industry, there is little or no public support for travel from what I can see.
Blut2 wrote: » I'm not sure reddit threads count as a particularly statistically valid sampling of the wider Irish population's wishes. Its my understanding it demographically skews quite heavily towards anti-social teenagers. Who wouldn't exactly be the most frequent flyers.