cfuserkildare wrote: » It's Polish, Not Irish. Native language and culture being displaced by invasive immigration.
osarusan wrote: » What a load of bollocks. Unless I missed the Poles slaughtering the population of the Gaeltacht areas. Perhaps they are them along with all the swans. The reality is that irish language has been on life support for a long long time, long before any 'invasive immigration' by the Poles. It was displaced by the English language and the Irish ourselves haven't cared enough about it to do anything about that. Laughable nonsense to attribute it to Poles (or any other group of recent immigrants).
cfuserkildare wrote: » Are yeh living under a rock or something? The Irish government have done the same as Germany, Invite people in to bolster population, and That is what my point was . Not having a go at the Polish, but the government and companies that will employ EU citizens over native residents. My last job had a team of 24 avmcross numerous sites in Ireland, 9 of this were native English speakers, 3 African, the rest Polish. Explain that please?
Biafranlivemat wrote: » The worst thing about that poster is. She lives in Ireland. Graduated in 2019. With a “B. Sc Medicinal Science”https://twitter.com/JessicaOkeke_/status/1188777612153446404
ARH privilege wrote: » "Economists agree that immigration has a net positive..." Yes absolutely. I saw a documentary movie about. Shortly the average age in some countries , currently "having problem" with immigration is around 46. If that info is correct ... after 2-3 decades there will be more pensioners there that workers. What will/should be happen with these countries budgets ?! How they gona finance themselves!? Should they "lockdown" or "close"... When I am retired, how the state will pay my pension?! if there are no people working and paying taxes... Why I am mention all these : immigrants are usually people who left their countries, looking for better life. For some better life is : better car , for some - own house, for other holiday in Hawaii , education for kids, etc.etc. and in order to achieve all these they are aware that have to work. Working they pay taxes so the both sides are satisfied . Country receive more taxes, improving citizens life - immigrant, its better life
kildare lad wrote: » Well the employment rate for Africans is only 45% , I wouldn't be relying on them to be paying any pensions. Also if they're getting HAP and and children's allowance etc , whatever job they're doing I can't see the tax they pay being covered by what the government give them .https://extra.ie/2018/11/07/business/irish/unemployment-rate-higher-african-migrants
[Deleted User] wrote: » And it's questionable how much they're spending within the Irish economy, since most of them are sending large portions of their income (personal or welfare) back to their home country to relatives.
kildare lad wrote: » I wonder is he friends with the other black chap from cork who stabbed the Irish fella the other weekhttps://www.echolive.ie/corknews/Man-shot-at-Cork-Gardai-with-pellet-gun-before-crashing-through-toll-booth-688c9a8a-e6f6-4bc4-80cc-dcb1b3b9b943-ds
Judge Kelleher was told that the defendant is 21 and his partner is 44.
Deleted User wrote: » And it's questionable how much they're spending within the Irish economy, since most of them are sending large portions of their income (personal or welfare) back to their home country to relatives.
endacl wrote: » The Irish economy would have collapsed in the mid 20th century without the remittances sent home from the UK, USA, Australia and elsewhere.
Deleted User wrote: » and?
Wibbs wrote: » It's just a variation on that hackneyed tune of, all together now: "Well the Irish were immigrants too".
SporadicMan wrote: » It really feels like we're just handing over our country to others nowadays. The people from Africa who come here seem to really hate us and now are trying to take our history as their own. What is the benefit of doing this?
ThunbergsAreGo wrote: » What is the difference between the employment rate and the percentage unemployed? Why js it 45% vs 16%
Kaybaykwah wrote: » It's hackneyed, but it has a ring of truth to it.
Mr. Karate wrote: » The Irish worked and paid for everything the got. They didn't get free houses, welfare for life with no obligation to find work and support themselves. Only to turn around and claim the country suck, their flag offends them, how oppressed they are, and that the host Country and its citizens should change their entire culture to suit them. If Whites went to non White Countries and acted like the how the Africans and Muslims are behaving in ours then they would be quickly thrown out of those Countries and there would be no Leftist [think of the children] circle jerking feeling agenda. Yet we're supposed to "tolerate" them and keep making adjustments to appease them.
The Irish worked and paid for everything the got. They didn't get free houses, welfare for life with no obligation to find work and support themselves.
that the host Country and its citizens should change their entire culture to suit them.
If Whites went to non White Countries and acted like the how the Africans and Muslims are behaving in ours then they would be quickly thrown out of those
Geuze wrote: » Let's say there are two countries, each with 100 working-age adults.Country A 40 inactive 57 work 3 unemployed Here, the UNR is 5% (3/60), and the employment rate is 57%.Country B 30 inactive 63 work 7 unemployed Country B has more unemployment (10%), but is also has higher employment, 63%. Ireland is like A, we have low unemployment until COVID, but we also had middling / not high employment.
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://w9.vanillicon.com/v2/9c6ef39403f5dc93bd4b9e77a11c1821.svg)
