Niner leprauchan wrote: » **** me, really? Tickets haven't been put on windscreens in over a decade. They are digitally issued from a central office. So the short answer is, you don't know. You incorrectly presumed.
Niner leprauchan wrote: » Next time, call the traffic watch number but if they continue to park they after getting tickets, then you need the penalty changed and considering I'm still waiting on something approaching an actual solution from you, I won't hold my breath.
AndrewJRenko wrote: » Because there were no tickets on windscreens. Because they are there every time I come past, obviously residents' cars mostly, with loads of space on their driveways, but they take public space because it's slightly more convenient.
meeeeh wrote: » A traffic warden can deal with that.
Spook_ie wrote: » [/B] Could I suggest you read the articles you link to, it might make more sense if you realised it was an inquest report about a cyclist and car
AndrewJRenko wrote: » Agreement would be very unusual. I agree with you about that. Not quite so sure about the second part though. In my experience, it is more often down to people finding themselves facing a wall of factual evidence that they have no answer for. Thanks for the good wishes.
ecoli3136 wrote: » Andrew, when the person you're addressing stops responding it doesn't mean they agree with you. It means you're left talking to yourself. Good luck.
Hurrache wrote: » You're a clown. You have to be, I mean why else would you be displaying a spectacular failure to grasp a very very simple bit of logic.
Hurrache wrote: » Cool, can I book myself in with you for a counselling session?
AndrewJRenko wrote: » Because there were no tickets on windscreens. Because they are there every time I come past, obviously residents' cars mostly, with loads of space on their driveways, but they take public space because it's slightly more convenient. Because some of them are parked on bike lanes. A traffic warden would be great. Previously, DLR had a policy of not sending wardens to places like this, only to places with paid parking. It looks like that policy may be changing, so there may be some hope of changes in this area;https://twitter.com/dlrcycling/status/1278453600390430720 Fully agree with you about the extent of on-street parking (or storage of private property on public space). Motorists should definitely get a full refund of any road tax they have paid too.Though it does happen : Stark Don't worry they will. Just like in the Phoenix park they decided the cycle lanes were nicer so used them instead of the footpath. with tragic consequences.https://www.irishtimes.com/news/crime-and-law/courts/coroner-s-court/changes-urged-to-phoenix-park-junction-where-cyclist-killed-1.3639658
: Stark Don't worry they will. Just like in the Phoenix park they decided the cycle lanes were nicer so used them instead of the footpath.
Niner leprauchan wrote: » Every single one of them could have gotten a ticket. How do you know they didn't?
Niner leprauchan wrote: » Second, how of the relevant to your beef with cycle lanes?
meeeeh wrote: » A traffic warden can deal with that. All you need is a tow truck, they can pickup the illegally parked cars or those without parking ticket and deposit them to depot. You can get them back after paying a fine. I must say I don't get the reluctance in Ireland to deal with this. I also don't get the enthusiasm for on street parking. I know some think a cycle lane down the Keys is great achievement but my question would be why is there that much car traffic and why is on street parking allowed on the streets in the area.
ecoli3136 wrote: » I don't see what the problem is. Cyclists could be given a full refund of theirs.
ecoli3136 wrote: » And pedestrians causing injury to cyclists is incredibly rare.
Stark wrote: » Don't worry they will. Just like in the Phoenix park they decided the cycle lanes were nicer so used them instead of the footpath.
07Lapierre wrote: » A real bike lane:https://twitter.com/fitzrik/status/1279410831067951104?s=21
Hurrache wrote: » That really brought a smile to my face, it must have been a universal thing for kids from the 80s, a right of passage!
Hurrache wrote: » Don't forget, really rise them by riding over them, doing a wheelie. With stunt pegs.
07Lapierre wrote: » Stuff’em! Peds don’t pay road tax! I’ll ride over them!
Niner leprauchan wrote: » Bastsrder, how can we long term this? Even there you are only able to offer a cursory paper over the cracks. The simple reality is as you say, it's being imposed over a standing system.
ecoli3136 wrote: » Crazy to expect pedestrians to stick to that narrow, uneven surface. Can't complain if joggers, parents with small kids, old people, anyone, feel its safer/less of a faff to use the cycle lane. What?
ecoli3136 wrote: » I don't see what the problem is. And pedestrians causing injury to cyclists is incredibly rare.
AndrewJRenko wrote: » A good start would be for Gardai to start enforcing traffic laws, so the pavement parking shown earlier doesn't happen as a matter of routine.
Niner leprauchan wrote: » . In regards entrances, the only way to deal with that is dedicated cycle lanes separated from the road.