jh79 wrote: » Article outlining all the breaches of the regulations. Some neck on MON to criticise the BLM protests only a month earlier. Makes you wonder if the SF TD and MLA have a choice when it comes to IRA funerals? Any fool could of predicted the media storm that would inevitably have followed. As Storey once said and Gerry too, "they haven't gone away".https://www.newsletter.co.uk/news/politics/sam-mcbride-despite-sinn-feins-trumpian-claims-storey-funeral-involved-least-10-breaches-public-health-advice-2903922
Edgware wrote: » We all know Francie is a gob****e but we have to entertain his notions until a suitable village idiot position becomes available
gormdubhgorm wrote: » Again you fail to see nuance life is not all kneecapping, bankrobbing, cover ups, and my glorified fallen are better than yours 'nah, nah, nah, nah' and so on.
In order to have any sort of a stable UI you will have to make the Unionist tradition feel included.
And the Unionists will take up arms against Republican oppression.
Brendan Bendar wrote: » He heheh ..you must think people are total idiots, Francie. You try to drop it down to ‘ attending a friends funeral’. Jeez man you have a poor opinion of posters here, that you think you’d get away with that fcuuuhkery. You have some neck to think that would roll, dude, I’ll have to give you that.
FrancieBrady wrote: » If it was mainly the public, I'd expect call in radio to light up. Did Duffy air even one call about it? It is mainly political outrage here IMO
jh79 wrote: » My point was that in these cases the outrage is being felt by the public also and it's not just the usual political back and forth that nobody cares about. COVID and funerals, misogyny and racism are all hot topics in the Republic as i'm sure you know.
FrancieBrady wrote: » SF made a mistake here but not one that warrants calling for a woman to resign or say attending her friends funeral was a mistake.
FrancieBrady wrote: » Oh come on JH...it's the usual over the top outrage that is blind to the fact that the same mistakes have been made elsewhere. What is clear from the election is that the public is well aware when that outrage is genuine and when it is faux for political gain. SF made a mistake here but not one that warrants calling for a woman to resign or say attending her friends funeral was a mistake.
jh79 wrote: » I doubt it's just political outrage hence the apology. Plenty of people respected the rules for their own families funerals. With regards the misogyny and racism from Holohan and the abortion debacle, they had there genesis on social media first before being picked up by the media.
gormdubhgorm wrote: » Does anyone else see this other irony but me. The very flipping time it is publicly acceptable to wear a mask no one was wearing one. Not one I saw! Yet precovid19 many in the Provos wore a republican form of PPE at funerals Or this INLA one with protected black and whites
FrancieBrady wrote: » Of course it will affect their poll figure...most of the political outrage is designed to affect that figure. They have like everyone else been there before.
FrancieBrady wrote: » Who ever said SF are your usual political party? Particularly in the north. I hope they never become the same as other main party's here. The uniform of the 'suit' has done enough damage
downcow wrote: » I am sure most southerners, prior to talk of unification, would be interested to know who the ‘black & whites’ are. Hundreds of them invited by Sinn Fein. Could anyone help us and explain who they are??
jh79 wrote: » They seem to turn up at a lot at IRA funerals. Some coincidence alright.
jh79 wrote: » All of their own making. Will be interesting to see if it has any impact on the opinion polls. Personally think the abortion amendment and Paddy "The Hooligan" Holohan debacle will have a greater impact. SF gained a lot of votes from the "woke" left with the "vote left transfer left" campaign. They have been very vocal in their disgust on these f*ck ups. General theme is that SF are just targeting that voter base rather than being a true left and liberal party and of course that Belfast calls the shots.
FrancieBrady wrote: » If you live in Ireland the same thing happens everytime SF make a mistake, particularly when high in the polls.
jh79 wrote: » Bit unusual for a political party.
Junkyard Tom wrote: » We neither seek nor require Unionist consent. When are people going to learn that Unionist electoral privilege is over? Have a read over the GFA and point out where it stipulates Unionist consent for a United Ireland.
FrancieBrady wrote: » I showed a picture on the other thread of the Garda funeral, with men in the same shirt and tie. They were I presume the local GAA team. I presume it is SFs way of showing the 'team' support.
jh79 wrote: » Working from home today and it was just behind COVID and the recent TD appointments in the news all day. Any more fallen "comrades" and MLD might have a tough decision to make.
downcow wrote: » I am curious as I am out of touch with news in ROI. How is this all going down? Is there pressure on Marylou for being involved in such an outrageous event? Is it being reported widely in ROI about the cremation versus funeral saga?
FrancieBrady wrote: » What else would the PSNI be contributing...picking the hymns?
downcow wrote: » This is where it all falls apart when anyone attempts to have a civil reasonable discussion with you. You know rightly there is a huge range of communication between reminding them of the regs and meticulous planning. They could talk about numbers, marshalling, etc etc I have from good authority that the ira were stopping cars and checking ID in west Belfast before the funeral.