AndrewJRenko wrote: » I'm honestly not sure if the limit you mention applies to cyclists. The bye-law linked to by others refer to vehicles, so that's obviously nothing to do with cyclists
RobbieMD wrote: » Generally “vehicle” when used in the legal sense refers to all vehicles, which would include a pedal cycle. Certain offences i.e. speeding, drunken driving, drunk in charge, etc are not defined using “vehicle” but rather “mechanically propelled vehicle”.
TaurenDruid wrote: » It's very clear it applies to bikes, and the big circled "10kmh" next to every stencil of a bike, on the cycle lane, is kind of a giveaway. Nice of Andy to grant that cycling at speed in a park is not the best thing to do, I honestly wasn't expecting that!
TaurenDruid wrote: » It's very clear it applies to bikes, and the big circled "10kmh" next to every stencil of a bike, on the cycle lane, is kind of a giveaway.
AndrewJRenko wrote: » Do parks have cycle lanes?
RobbieMD wrote: » And yet it carries the same legal weight of a 5 kmph speed limit in my local shopping centre car park.
TaurenDruid wrote: » :rolleyes: Pedantry, meet Andy. Andy, pedantry. Oh, you already know each other?
TaurenDruid wrote: » Does it? IANAL. There are Dublin City Council bye-laws. I assume they're able to enforce them and there are penalties for not doing so.
magicbastarder wrote: » check out 4.6(g) in the pdf i linked a few posts above - that seems to apply to all vehicles.
meeeeh wrote: » What's the obsession with court of law? What about just doing the decent thing. I have no issues with cyclists in the park but does it really have to be enforced in the court of law to not be ignorant and slow down in places where there are a lot of people especially kids. The same attitude is around littering or a lot of other activities that require a bit of personal responsibility and not being a complete selfish prick. Edit: I was replying to Duckjob
magicbastarder wrote: » i can't believe i'm engaging in this trivial sideshow about parks, but the speed limit is 10km/h and the maximum penalty for violating a bye-law in a public park is €1,200. for people having such an extended argument about it, you sure are slow about educating yourself on what you're arguing about. this took about 60s to find.https://www.dublincity.ie/sites/default/files/content/RecreationandCulture/DublinCityParks/Documents/ParksBye-Laws2D.pdf
AndrewJRenko wrote: » It's all just a bit confusing to be honest. I don't think parks have cycle lanes. Therefore I'm not sure that speed limit signs would be intended for cyclists in the first place? In the DLR parks, they generally have 'no cycling' rules, so I'm struggling to see where these speed limits fit.
07Lapierre wrote: » Another "Perfectly Fine/Safe" bike lane!https://twitter.com/pward82/status/1278673471439081474?s=20
Niner leprauchan wrote: » I must have missed something, what's the issue here?
meeeeh wrote: » A quick question. Do people actually watch linked videos? EspeciallyTwitter links. If I wanted to follow tweets I would on Twitter. (I might be weird I even find 'funny' WhatsApp videos tedious. At some stage it's just video pollution.)
AndrewJRenko wrote: » Did you not notice all the cars parked on the bike lane? Maybe they should have had hi-vis stripes?
07Lapierre wrote: » Santry to Dublin Airport. Glasnevin to Finglas Both of these routes have to be the most pathetic attempts at cycle lane design ever! Both are a total waste of time and money. Bad cycle lane infrastructure is worse than no cycle lane infrastructure ... because people who know feck all about commuting by bike can’t understand why cyclists do t use these lanes!
Casey78 wrote: » On this thread,nope very rarely look at any of the video links.
meeeeh wrote: » I think sooner or later someone tells us what's in them anyway. In fairness I don't watch what Gemma O'Doherty and her friends are producing either. They seem to be equally dedicated.