osarusan wrote: » I think this is a silly line of thinking to be honest. Yes, words are just collections of letters and the value is placed on them by individuals. But the point is that these insults have value, and different insults have different strengths, and those values and strengths are for the most part shared and understood by members of a society, and words are selected for use based on these shared understandings. The OP's partner chose the word 'c**t' over the word 'plonker' for a reason - because it more appropriately explains the values or strength they want to express. Likewise, the OP chose the expression 'have the balls to...' over other similar expressions, for the same reason. So (and I know you didn't say this) whether or not 'c**t' is a tem of endearment in Australia is irrelevant here (unless maybe the OP's partner is Australian). We are talking about the shared understanding of the term, and the shared understanding of its strength, in the Irish context. I agree that there are wider issues here beyond the use of a particular word, but the use of that word has meaning.
Anongirl306 wrote: » I get the silent treatment for a whole day
Anongirl306 wrote: » To the person who suggested not bringing my phone to work - my role requires me to be in 3 WhatsApp chats that are active every day.
Hannibal_Smith wrote: » Enough of the back and forth about whether you find a word offensive or not. It is off topic and of no help to the OP.
Mrcaramelchoc wrote: » Its in the title of the thread and has everything to do with the ops problem.its not the only thing but it is within the topic.
leggo wrote: » Did you ever see the Bill Burr stand-up routine about how when women realise they’re wrong it all becomes a big wind-up until the man snaps and calls them a c***, so now he’s wrong because he used that one particular word? I’m not even saying that’s true, but wow it absolutely nails this particular situation... The reality is OP that you caused this situation. You made his family quiz that he’d been planning about you, first trying to get your round in, then getting sulky when he said no, then throwing his olive branch back in his face. His reaction was bad but he was also right to feel frustrated with you...because your behaviour was wrong. And while you’re very quick to talk about how you’ll take blame to us and how you could’ve done better with how you reacted, I get the feeling you didn’t say all of this to him or this probably wouldn’t have escalated. Also why did you bring up the fact that you work in healthcare? Be honest, did you think we’d all say “oh well then you’re a hero so you couldn’t possibly be wrong, **** that guy”? Even that suggests a trait where you’re trying to manipulate the situation and bring irrelevant outside stuff into it so you can skirt taking responsibility for when you’re wrong. Again, his response wasn’t great, but I read this situation more like he took the bait. Again, you caused this situation, whether the word he used was worse or not and whether you work in healthcare or not. So for me you should be the one who starts the apologies here. If he doesn’t follow suit, fair enough, you’ve a right to feel aggrieved. But you can’t act like you did then get offended when that impacts another person and they react.
KiKi III wrote: » It’s like you think he had no other options other than to call him a c***.
TLDR: Don’t take relationship advice from Bill Burr.
She brought up that she works in healthcare because that is markedly different than texting someone who’s at work in an office or on the till at the local Spar.
leggo wrote: » Didn’t say that...deflection. Didn’t say that either, in fact I specifically said I don’t even believe the example to be true but it does describe this one situation to a tee (namely because it’s exactly what’s happening)...deflection. Aaaand none of that has anything to do with the family quiz issue that caused all of this...deflection. These kind of poor logical and communication examples - created by one person being unable to just say “I’m sorry, I shouldn’t have gotten sulky and realised it was your family’s quiz and not about me or my round” - are exactly how arguments like this escalate from nothing into this mess. If everyone just owns their own behaviour, names don’t get called. She caused this, she apologises first. He reacted badly, he should apologise then. Simple. Only a person absolutely allergic to admitting that they’re wrong would argue that two partners apologising and moving on is a bad solution.