Hamachi wrote: » I’m sure you’re right. It’s just a pretty outrageous notion that s/he is propagating. The indigenous Irish need to be genetically diversified to protect against conditions that affect a tiny subset of the population. If I proposed this for e.g. sub-Saharan Africans or South East Asians, I would be roundly castigated and rightly so. The spectacular ignorance of comments like that just can’t be let go unchallenged.
Eric Cartman wrote: » judging by Dublins Lord Mayor appointment this evening, our cities are about to get a lot more 'diverse' Hazel chu " She also said that she would tackle discrimination, saying that it wasn’t enough “not to be racist, we have to be anti-racist”. So hate speech laws, minority priority / minority quotas for social housing and school places id say is on the cards. Im aware she herself can't bring those in but with Leo's ear and the greens in power I could see it happening. Funny how theres no ministerial appointments from the province they've been forcing to deal with these migrants...
dominatinMC wrote: » Ah she's harmless really. She is a bit fond of playing the race card, and the accompanying rhetoric (which is grating), but other than that seems likeable.
wildeside wrote: » I'm not sure if anyone has made the "we need more immigration for an ageing population" point in this thread yet, but it's worth considering that it's just an opinion and is certainly debatable at the very leasthttps://www.businessinsider.com/aging-population-and-automation-effect-on-economic-growth-2017-3?r=UK Just another factor to consider in the debate.
dominatinMC wrote: Ah she's harmless really. She is a bit fond of playing the race card, and the accompanying rhetoric (which is grating), but other than that seems likeable.
oholly121 wrote: » Yeah I second this I’d consider myself to be centre right and it’s embarrassing the abuse she gets on Twitter there’s really no need for it! I believe the family came from Hong Kong which I don’t think is the main crux of the conversation here !
Eric Cartman wrote: » aside from Gemma and her tiny group of fans, Hazel gets very little abuse about her ethnicity or country of origin. However she loves playing the race card and fear any pontification she may use her position to garner ears for will remain unchallenged due to shrieks of racism.She has openly stated on twitter she wants to end deportations and more financial supports for travellers, both of which I feel are detrimental to our society and need challenge.
ThunbergsAreGo wrote: » What a ridiculous article
Deleted User wrote: » What article? It's just a tweet... and I honestly don't see the problem with wishing someone well... hardly grounds for discussion.
ThunbergsAreGo wrote: » Whoops absolutely the wrong link!!! I of course wish Andre Wisdom well :eek: This is the one https://www.rte.ie/brainstorm/2020/0629/1150259-african-americans-refugee-status-ireland-racism-direct-provision-law/
Deleted User wrote: » God, I hope not. We don't need them importing their bias against White people. Let them fix the problems in their own first world country.... and it simply makes a mockery of the whole system to suggest that they can/should apply for refugee status.
Slowyourrole wrote: » Black people came from slavery, are more likely to live in poverty, are subject to regular racism, and have very little political power in comparison to white people. I'd hope your solution that they should sort the country themselves is motivated by extreme ignorance and not simply callous disregard for what it means to be under the boot of society.
And can you imagine fifty people a day? I said FIFTY people a day Walkin' in, singin' a bar of "Alice's Restaurant" and walkin' out? Friends They may think it's a Movement,
Deleted User wrote: » There are millions of African Americans who have reasonably good lifestyles (on par with many white Middle class families) , due to their educational accomplishments, and their avoidance of crime. Rather than ask the questions as to why their lives are different, posters like yourself (and many black people) want to focus entirely on the obstacles.
endacl wrote: » Hard to imagine a dish that can’t be improved by adding a dash of spice. Good thing.
Granadino wrote: » It would be interesting to hear about any of the obstacles that these people faced in their reasonably good lifestyles compared to many white middle class families... In this day and age, I find the term "African American" obsolete. American.
jmayo wrote: » And the whole time they ignored the real terrorist extremists in our midst, the ones linked to ISIS, muslim brotherhood, al-qeada. The ones money laundering and managing funds for these organisations. The fact we have had suicide bombers bred and raised in this state. So much for our media.
wildeside wrote: » You see there's no moral virtue or superiority to be gained by discussing that obvious problem. It's very safe and socially rewarding to talk about the "fascists" lurking under every bed. To not discuss problems like thishttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bombings_in_Sweden is a real societal ill. Sweden is the single most open, progressive, egalitarian, inclusive country in Europe, if not the world, and look at the end result of their implementation of immigration, integration and multiculturalism. 2nd only to Mexico in the world for grenade attacks. Bravo Sweden, bravo. When you are blinded by ideology relality can more easily punch you in the face. I am centre left and have been all my life. The vast majority of my friends are. But I see a huge unwillingness on the left to acceopt or even think it possible that there might be some serious issues to address all because it makes people uncomfortable. This lack of engagement with difficult issues is sometimes due to cowardice, sometimes ideological blindness and sometimes just simple ("why can't we all just get along?") childish naievte. And sure some racists and bigots and xenophobes will jump on these talking points and exploit them to their own ends. But should that stop reasonable people having a reasonable adult conversation about these issues? F&*k no. People have to defend the right to a peaceful and prosperous society for all its citizens and that can only be acheived through debate, as uncomfortable as it might be sometimes.
Bambi wrote: » Curse those racists Yanks with their bars on Black People voting or holding office
biko wrote: » Does multiculturalism also mean Brits buying properties and living in enclaves in Spain, many not learning Spanish nor interacting with the locals?
TomTomTim wrote: » That's the modern world for you, people being forced to live on a mountain of lies, scared to talk about anything no matter how true it is.
[Deleted User] wrote: » Nah.. white people going somewhere else isn't multiculturalism, that's colonialism or imperialism. Now, if it was Black/Brown British people moving to Spain then, that would be multiculturalism. As time goes by, It's seems less and less about sharing culture and more about race/ethnicity being the important factor.
Deleted User wrote: » Whereas I find American to be an obsolete terms. Identity politics has ensured that their nation is fractured and everyone is making connections with different groups rather than unifying under a single nationality. But then, the US has always been very vague about being american.