gimli2112 wrote: » yeah I was reading that on the TLOU subreddit. A plot hole it would seem as Ellie bit the mad cannibal (Richard?) in the first one telling him he was infected now too. I have a feeling she bit her in the first fight in the movie theatre.
gimli2112 wrote: » Part 3 for me starts with Ellie waking up and 2 was just a bad dream. There's a petition in reddit for ND to change the story. Had over 50,000 signatures last I saw.
gimli2112 wrote: » Watched Upper Echelon Games' review this morning and he eviscerates the story and ND choices both here and with the marketing. Has there ever been such a divisive game?I'm a mega nerd fanboy of the first which puts me in a difficult position with it.
Deleted User wrote: » Alot of folks are in this position Masking such a bait and switch in the game was probably part of the struggle here, you can claim it was deceptive and that's fine but it really does sound like it wasn't an afterthought. It was as per design from day 1 IMO The leaks caused turmoil to that plan As I have been mulling it over it's starting to come together for me The bait and switch reminds me of MGS2 in certain aspects. But was easier to mask that as mass internet media / coverage / leaks was not a thing back then. I remember being absolutely raging about that initially and so were alot of the MGS fanbase. Now I love it and why it was done.
Markitron wrote: » I actually don't really consider it a bait and switch at all, you spend about 15-16 hours playing as Ellie, it is her story and it starts and ends with her. Abby's story is there to add context. MGS2 was a prologue as Snake and the whole game as Raiden, it was his story. I really don't think they are comparable at all beyond the superficial.
Deleted User wrote: » I am only referencing the spoiler masking aspects. I don't have an issue with playing either character personally.
gimli2112 wrote: » Watched Upper Echelon Games' review this morning and he eviscerates the story and ND choices both here and with the marketing. Has there ever been such a divisive game? I'm a mega nerd fanboy of the first which puts me in a difficult position with it.
The Raging Bile Duct wrote: » I made it five minutes into that video before giving up. What's the difficult position that you're in?
gimli2112 wrote: » It makes no sense on various levels. The dual revenge scenarios, fine but the fact Ellie gets a reasonable outcome, is relatively happy and sets off on a third revenge trip is jarring. Not only that but after going through hell to find Abby saves her, changes her mind again and fights to the death, changes her mind again and lets her live.
Markitron wrote: » This made perfect sense to me. When she returned home to her life with Dina she clearly had PTSD and thought killing Abby would end it and allow her some peace, that is why she left. When she cut Abby down it was with the sole purpose of fighting her to the death. She was obviously conflicted and the flashback of Joel's beaten face pushed her over the edge and they fight. Just before Abby drowns she has the flashback of her last conversation with Joel which was all about trying to forgive, this is why she doesn't kill Abby.
Penn wrote: » I doubt Ellie can pass on the infection like that. Otherwise you'd imagine even kissing would pass it on too. I'd say she was just telling the cannibal (David) that he was now infected just to distract him so she could try to escape as she wouldn't know herself at that stage whether she could infect people anyway.
gimli2112 wrote: » The MGS2 analogy is a good one.