Fabio wrote: » And are those open to the public at the moment? I thought they were all closed off at the moment...
Fabio wrote: » Thank you folks. It's something the city needs to work on though, shouldn't be a secret .
ofcork wrote: » Just behind a guy using toilets in merchants quay he didnt bother washing the hands.
PreCocious wrote: » One option is to have attended toilets. Saint Malo in France has loads of public toilets along the promenade and within the city walls. They all have attendants and are absolutely spotless. Other places that have unattended toilets are of very variable quality.
Loire wrote: » Yesterday's Irish Times..... Sir,– Now that the city of Cork is so well represented in the new Government, might it be possible for them to see to it that the most basic human requirement for public conveniences is provided for a population now approaching a quarter of a million? English local councils have been heavily criticised for “only” running an average of 15 toilets per 12,500 citizens . If we were so provided in such a miserly fashion we would, proportionately, have over 200. But how many do we have? The answer is none. Yes, you non-Corkonians have read that right. The second city of one of the richest states in the world does not provide a single public convenience. So what does the contemptuous disregard for an essential public need say about our political representatives? – Yours, etc, DERMOT O’ DOWDA, Blackpool, Cork.
Tig98 wrote: » I agree with the need for public toilets but still you need some perspective on it. The actual city area is very dense and any number even near 50 spread across the whole city would be complete over kill. It just isn't a very big metropolitan area. And at the end of the day who says England sets the standard. I wonder where that 1/4 of a million figure is coming from? Does it include all the way out to Blarny and surrounds as the "city" limits were extended a few years ago?
Barr wrote: » Pubs etc are opening today so things should improve .