Gruffalox wrote: » Here's one that is right up your street Andrew, since concern for genitals must be fascist. A recent Bill in Wyoming USA banning Female Genital Mutilation came under intense pressure before thankfully it was passed. The pressure came from trans activists who saw it as a draconian limits on trans gender people. The absolute disgrace of it. Another related point is on Hibo Wardere, an absolutely amazing woman from Somalia, who had level 3 FGM at 6 years old (92% of females in Somalia have some degree of FGM )a procedure that caused every drop of urine that passed from her body to cause agonising pain. She is an educator on the matter of FGM living in the UK now. Recently she has had to publicly ask trans activists to back off attacking her because they say ''Female'' in fgm is transphobic. I sh1t you not! There have been protests outside places where she gives talks by these morons. Other women who have been brutalised by FGM have also been attacked by TRAs. As long as this type of cretinism goes on I will keep myself very well informed and up to date on the whole topic, perhaps to your discomfort, but try and stop me.https://twitter.com/hibowardere/status/1269999207030669313?s=21https://twitter.com/RadfemJana/status/1269389904175419392
Deleted User wrote: » The issue of children receiving transgender transitions including hormones is extremely troubling. A huge number of staff resigned from Tavistock due to concerns the clinic is engaging in over-diagnosis and unethical practices. This is all fly-by-night stuff, a branch of medicine that is essentially being made up as they go along. Children are being experimented on. Autistic children are being given puberty blockers after 1 consultation. Little or no follow-ups. An enormous unexplained explosion in the numbers of children being diagnosed with dysphoria and no attempt to understand it or put the brakes on. There is widespread child abuse going on, kids irreparably harmed. But if you say anything you're a bigot.
TomTomTim wrote: » What's hilarious about this is that he's been doing the same thing for all his Twitter life, the only difference was it was right wingers who he used to attack all the time. Now that it's a protected groups, there's outrage from the same types who probably once cheered him on.
TomTomTim wrote: » What's hilarious about this is that he's been doing the same thing for all his Twitter life, the only difference was that it was right wingers who he used to attack all the time. Now that it's a protected groups, there's outrage from the same types who probably once cheered him on.
joeguevara wrote: » I’m a bit confused, why would advertisers ask for rent to be doubled.
joeguevara wrote: » In the scenario being discussed it was Linehan who spent all day every day for 2 years shoving his views unsolicited in to other people and engaged in harassment and stalking which resulted in his ban.
Cupatae wrote: » I believe a man is a man and a woman is a woman, This cant be changed its science we can pretend but thats about it... but that aside trans people should allow do as they will in peace, but they shouldn't be allowed to force there views on to other people..
Eric Cartman wrote: » Except its not. Nobody is forced to follow graham linehan on twitter, its more like being in a pub woth your mates and expressing a view and somebody overhears you so they contact the pub landlord (advertisers) and ask him to double the rent unless they ban you and your mates from the pub
KiKi III wrote: » If you stood up in a pub and started giving out about trans people every day, you’d probably get a few warnings from bar staff but soon enough you’d get barred. This is the same principle.
KiKi III wrote: » Twitter openly admits Trump breaks their rules. But they feel that as leader of the USA, they can’t ban him. So they’re fact-checking his tweets instead.
Obvious Desperate Breakfasts wrote: » There are a lot of people who keep their thoughts on this topic to themselves because they fear for their jobs and even their safety if their identity is uncovered. I’ve received a good fews PMs from people telling me they are afraid to say anything about it. And this is totally mad but I’ve had people express admiration for me for being fairly outspoken on this topic here on boards.ie. I just think I’m talking sense but I’m partial, I guess. And I have no job to lose, so come at me, bitches.
Rodin wrote: » Im talking about the trying to convince children they're a different gender and advocating puberty blockers. Prescribing puberty blockers for transgenderism should be illegal worldwide in my opinion.
Obvious Desperate Breakfasts wrote: » Hahahahahahahaha. No. “Fully reversible” has been trotted out so much. I’ve seen it stated in mainstream articles. On Twitter. It’s all gone a bit quiet on that front lately but it is an outright lie to say that all transgender groups were honest about the lack of evidence re: the reversibility of puberty blockers. Even the NHS claimed that they were reversible until VERY recently. The Mayo Clinic still claims that there are no permanent changes in the child’s body. Look it up. As of this evening, they still claim that, despite the NHS admitting that there is no evidence to say that they don’t cause long-term damage.
sweet_trip wrote: » He most likely does. Considering he's an internet addict. Sure the first thing he did when he got banned was go to mumsnet (LOL) to look for sympathy and was promptly told to go away. Sad sad man.
TuringBot47 wrote: » Well for some, certain trans demands are just a step too far. It's probably the line in the sand against the woke crowd.
Gruffalox wrote: » Here's one that is right up your street Andrew, since concern for genitals must be fascist. A recent Bill in Wyoming USA banning Female Genital Mutilation came under intense pressure before thankfully it was passed. The pressure came from trans activists who saw it as a draconian limits on trans gender people. The absolute disgrace of it. Another related point is on Hibo Wardere, an absolutely amazing woman from Somalia, who had level 3 FGM at 6 years old (92% of females in Somalia have some degree of FGM )a procedure that caused every drop of urine that passed from her body to cause agonising pain. She is an educator on the matter of FGM living in the UK now. Recently she has had to publicly ask trans activists to back off attacking her because they say ''Female'' in fgm is transphobic. I sh1t you not! There have been protests outside places where she gives talks by these morons. Other women who have been brutalised by FGM have also been attacked by TRAs. As long as this type of cretinism goes on I will keep myself very well informed and up to date on the whole topic, perhaps to your discomfort, but try and stop me.
AndrewJRenko wrote: » But it's fascinating to see how many posters are suddenly medical experts in this one particular very narrow niche area, and not, just for example, the kind of stuff that goes on in cosmetic surgery clinics all over the country. What is the obsession with genitals all about?
US — Wyoming. Transgender activists are protesting a bill that would criminalize the performance of female genital mutilation on a minor in Wyoming as an act of aggravated assault and battery. Tara Muir, Policy Director of the Wyoming Coalition Against Domestic Violence and Sexual Assault (WCADVSA), has slammed the legislation as having the potential to place “draconian limits on transgender people.” /
Deleted User wrote: » didnt a group turn up at his wife's workplace at some stage?
Gatling wrote: » Nothing had being twisted - see exactly what I was saying Vulnerable children need to be protected not medicated under some quakery experiments ,
Gruffalox wrote: » Not according to Tavistock medical personnel. Some have written of overhearing people in corridors prompting and preparing children as to what language they must use in order to secure hormones. Official reports have said children have received same after only one appointment. And you are one of the people who has adopted a very laissez faire approach to this area which will scandalise future people - just for the record.
Better Than Christ wrote: » Some say his 'interest' in the topic started after he received a very small amount of (perhaps not entirely deserved) criticism for this depiction of transphobia in the IT Crowd:
joeguevara wrote: » Katie Hopkins, 45, has been permanently banned by Twitter for breaching its rules on abuse and hateful conduct. I'm genuinely stunned. Looking at her face, I thought she was 65.
joeguevara wrote: » Firstly, the gender is a lie is exactly what Rowling posted. In essence a man can never change into a woman or vice versa.
Tony EH wrote: » The joke in The IT Crowd is at Douglas Reynholm's expense. Not the character that Lucy Montgomery plays. Don't understand why people can't get that. In fact, EVERYTHING to do with Douglas Reynholm is at his expense. He's exclusively the butt of humour. Can't recall a single episode where you're supposed to side with him.
Deleted User wrote: » Start with people like Alex Jones who are clearly horrible and then you have set the stage for controlling global discourse and opinion. It's absurd that a private company wields so much power and is cheered on. Then they'll tell you to go use a different site if you don't like it. And they try and succeed in getting those sites shut down as well. "Oh no how is boards getting so rightwing. Oh no why are People voting in the right."
Better Than Christ wrote: » Some say his 'interest' in the topic started after he received a very small amount of (perhaps not entirely deserved) criticism for this depiction of transphobia in the IT Crowd: .
hetuzozaho wrote: » Is there any consensus on why he got so obsessed with this stuff? His account is a mess for a long time now, such anger and hate. Can't be good for you.
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://wd.vanillicon.com/v2/dcbc16ebc222633fce50824c4b8e3c07.svg)
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://wb.vanillicon.com/v2/bed6f1d088326d5eb21c0139847332c7.svg)