Deleted User wrote: » And the Irish who left during the recessions? Those who left within the last twenty years, and would like to return but can't really afford to?
Kaybaykwah wrote: » I agree with you on some points, but really, if Ireland is an expensive and desirable country, it is because it has a worldly component. It would not have had the success it had in the past thirty years without its worldliness in business, and playing its EU cards right, digging in when Russia was opening up to capitalism, etc...
Deleted User wrote: » I live and teach at universities in China. You don't know what you're talking about. Chinese students will talk up human rights because they're studying in the West... but the moment they return to mainland China, they'll stop caring. Because it's not relevant to their lives. That's the essence of Chinese culture for normal people. What is practically relevant to their lives while living in China.
ILoveYourVibes wrote: » They can't really afford to. If we could tackle the housing issue and convince the govt actually we reeealy have NOT recovered ..then we might help them. But with a right wing ideology prob not going to happen.
Deleted User wrote: » https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c5vsnX1UD1w Have a watch. Pretty good account...
ILoveYourVibes wrote: » Of course they will stop caring in a university where their every move is noted and toted up to social credit. Or rather appearing to care. Its too dangerous. How you posting on boards from china? No one can right now not even through vpn.
Kaybaykwah wrote: » To me, as a member of the diaspora.
ILoveYourVibes wrote: » This is pie in the sky though. Why do people have to leave to find jobs then?
Slowyourrole wrote: » Do you think the large amount of Irish that travelled to the USA had an overall positive or negative effect?
What enclaves?
You're using colonial countries as examples of what could happen in Ireland. Isn't there a difference there? Seems you're happy to ignore the differences when it suits your narrative.
Clarence Boddiker wrote: » You're just one member of the diaspora, there are others who do not share your view. I have friends in Aussie, Canada etc who are in a state of absolute shock and despair at whats happening to Ireland. I read a very interesting article a while back (which I'm trying to find) which said that respect for the Irish has plummeted across the continent. Italians, Germans, French etc used to view Ireland as a nation that stubbornly held on to its traditions and culture in the face of modernity, this was something they admired greatly. They saw Ireland as the last vestiges of a Celtic, agrarian, rural society which had once existed across Europe. But the Irish, being consumed with self loathing and a gigantic inferiority complex have desperately cast off anything remotely associated with their traditional culture and tried (still) to be the most modern nation in Europe, culturally, morally etc The point of the thesis was there was a huge sense of disgust at the fact that whilst other European nations had a very long and drawn out separation from Catholicism for example, the Irish in a few decades went from very Catholic to the complete opposite. Almost maniacally denouncing their own past, desperate to be seen as anything but 'old' Irish. Embarrassed by that which ironically others admired in us. And this desperation to cast off every semblance of their culture and to be like the others has paradoxically destroyed the respect the continental nations had for us. Edit: I'm not saying that Ireland should return to a pseudo theocratic state. But you get the picture.
Wibbs wrote: » There are parts of Dublin that are becoming less native Irish over time and over the last ten to fifteen years. Not a shock as people almost inevitably coalesce together among their "own", often around religious community settings, but also retail centres and the like.
Wibbs wrote: » Positive. For a colony that required mass numbers of people from elsewhere to exist in the first place and grow thereafter. I don't see how this is difficult to understand or to understand the differences. There are parts of Dublin that are becoming less native Irish over time and over the last ten to fifteen years. Not a shock as people almost inevitably coalesce together among their "own", often around religious community settings, but also retail centres and the like. *Heads keyboard* No. I am saying using ex colonies that depended on "multiculturalism" immigration to simply exist as examples of the positives of this idea is not comparable to European(or other) non colonies and is beyond silly. Never mind that they were not exactly multicultural for most of their history and still have major issues today along "race" lines, or have you missed the whole BLM marches and protests? I am also looking at the decades long examples of European states that have embraced this politic, or were forced to because of a colonial past and their experiences and the extra social pressures up to outright social disorder and don't want that for this country or any other that has so far escaped this politic. And no, "exotic" cafes dont really serve as a prize. Booby prize maybe.
joe40 wrote: » Well that edit makes your post a bit confusing. If I understand you correctly you seem to be critical of social change in Ireland or at least suggest Europeans are critical of the social change, but at the same time you would not want to return to those times. So which is it 1980s Ireland or 2020 Ireland. That was also quite a big statement to assign a single unified opinion of Ireland to millions of Europeans.
Kaybaykwah wrote: » Well Okay then, let's do away with all the foreign influences altogether and go back to the bog and dig peet for chri'n out loud, do away with the Irish pubs in Paris and Tokyo while you are at it. I'd strip the Riverdancers myself and paint them all in blue, give them bows and arrows, no spotlights, no electric harps.
Clarence Boddiker wrote: » The problem is that there are many Irish who associate everything, every aspect of our past, our culture, with backwardness and Catholicism. Throwing out the baby with the bathwater.
Deleted User wrote: » I really don't understand the need to offer absolutes or extremes, as if it's all or zero multiculturalism. Nobody is suggesting closing all borders, and fighting off all foreign influence with spearpoints at the ready.
Kaybaykwah wrote: » Yes, all of a sudden, I seem to have hit a nerve.
Deleted User wrote: » Err.... I'm starting to see a trend with the lack of logic going around.
Clarence Boddiker wrote: » Here's a bunch of NGO personnel asking "how do we undermine the ethnic aspect of Irish identity?
Kaybaykwah wrote: » Excellent. I remember when you could undermine African ethnic identity in missionary work, and who would raise an eyebrow to that? Another bit of colonialism in reverse. Welcome to the club.
Clarence Boddiker wrote: » I object to Colonialism in all its forms, past present and future. Glad you agree that what they're discussing is essentially colonialism.
Slowyourrole wrote: » But there was a hierarchy of immigrants, with the Irish being pretty low and considered much like many here consider asylum seekers and immigrants from outside Europe now. So I think the comparison is pretty valid. Do you think the Irish integrated and provided an overall benefit to the USA?
BarnardsLoop wrote: » Here's a video of some people some racist gob****e uploaded to Bitchute and racist gob****es on Boards are more than happy to eat up. Whoop-de-bloody-do.
Tony EH wrote: » That wasn't the point either. The issue is that there wasn't really an indigenous culture for the Irish to be integrated into. Doesn't matter whether the "Dirty Irish" were considered to be just one rung above the blacks in much of America. Plus when the Irish moved to, say, the likes of New York, they were very much segregated into their own communities. The Chinese were the same, so were the Germans, so were the Italians...etc. There was no great melting pot at street level. It was very much groups of nationalities living among their own and it was like that until quite recently. You could go back to Queens in 1975 and see whole Irish neighbourhoods. Cross a certain street and you were in an Italian neighbourhood and I can assure you there was little harmony. Go up to Brooklyn and you could tell instantly where the Polish Neighbourhood ended and the Jewish one began. 110th Street in Manhattan was the demarcation line between "white" streets and Harlem. And ot would still be very much this way except for the fact that living costs have forced the break up of communities. Now they are segregated by wealth status instead.
Clarence Boddiker wrote: » The messenger is irrelevant, I know nothing about the uploader, came across it on twitter. The video is real and thats all that matters. By the by if there was a group discussing how they could undermine Kenyan or Somalian ethnic identity it would be rightly denounced.
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://w9.vanillicon.com/v2/9c6ef39403f5dc93bd4b9e77a11c1821.svg)
