Cupatae wrote: » So because I won't explain why your comparisons of the ruc , northern Ireland , Irish tenant farms ECT ECT to BLM are laughable.. it means they must be correct how about it's so painfully obvious that it's a waste of time.
Go back and read the posts you were found wanting on multiple points from black poverty to defunding the police...
Cupatae wrote: » Defunding the police ain't gonna cut it there.
Cupatae wrote: » Should they ever be stupid enough to defund the police in the states , you ll be in for a interesting time!
You are completely biased on every point and unwilling to be proven wrong even tho you have been now multiple times by multiple posters...There honestly isn't much more to say to you really you ve played your hand and showed your true colors , the mask slipped and there's no putting it back on. All the posts are there for everyone to go back and read including yourself don't be asking me to do it for you.
Foxtrol wrote: » It is blatantly obvious that you aren't able to explain it. You cant deal with the fact that you're moaning about actions a certain group of people want to do but are perfectly fine about Irish people doing the same. The situations where I've stated facts, backed up with data, reports, examples, while you're now just talking nonsense. Here are your last 2 contributions on defunding the police So insightful, you really showed me... :rolleyes: Proved wrong by the same posters that have admitted to being paranoid about imagined scenarios where they are a victim or the ones getting outraged by a tweet by a randomer on twitter? I'm biased when I'm having a discussion with people that admit their feelings or imagination trump facts. Give me some data points or comparisons that don't have fundamental flaws and you might get there. However, the last poster that tried that has been missing since I showed him how terrible his data was, including multiple studies and admission from the source itself. Talking about masks slipping, I'm still waiting for someone to give me a better word to describe what you and other posters have been doing between spamming the thread with videos of criminality by one race or questioning the effort to work of one race with no evidence.
Cupatae wrote: » Right so your gonna qoute me out of context , take snippets of convos and repeatedly make stuff up... Your boring me now.
Cupatae wrote: » From tenant farmers to the ruc are we still talking about BLM in the US, absolutely ridiculous comparisons , and you talk to other posters about comparing apples and oranges So it's not racism you want to end then it's poverty specifically black poverty because everyone should be treated equal what ya think about white poverty??, But anyway I've got some bad news for ya... Defunding the police ain't gonna cut it there.
Cupatae wrote: » Making stuff up again I see , can you qoute me on about the tenant farmers bit ? Thanks You ve been pressed for answers ya ain't got em your realizing slowly how ridiculous your stances and your reaching desperately now... You ve been found wanting!Should they ever be stupid enough to defund the police in the states , you ll be in for a interesting time!
As I said everyone can go back and read the posts you ve been found wanting on multiple points but your unwilling to be proven, wrong you bring up ridiculous comparisons ruc nonsense.
I've destroyed you on every relevant point so much so you d to go back to tenant farmers and accusing the people that point out deficiencies in your argument racist.
Anyways I've proven my points and won't be going over old ground in circles repeating the same stuff over and over.
Foxtrol wrote: » There is no additional context about defunding the police in the rest of those posts, see below for them in full. You've nothing to back up your points about defunding the police other than your feelings. If they were so ridiculous you should have been easily able to point out why and you've utterly failed. Destoryed... :rolleyes: I've repeatedly posted accurate data, scientific reports, examples, comparisons and you've refused to engage or disprove any of them and instead have posted what you feel and your imagination throws out. It appears you're confused about the difference in stating your point and proving your point. To prove a point you have to provide evidence and actually engage with the counterpoints the other person makes. I'm happy for you to leave the discussion, as we clearly aren't getting anywhere with your inability to debate.
Tony EH wrote: » I think all lives do matter, including black lives. If that makes one a "racist", then that word has lost all meaning.
Danzy wrote: » You wouldn't say it in public. I'm not joking about that.
Tony EH wrote: » I can assure you. Anything that I say on here, I'll say in public.
Cupatae wrote: » You need me to explain to you why defunding the us police is a bad idea ? Jesus I gave you some bit of credit and thought you d be able to figure that much out by yourself.. honestly I'm not gonna spoon feed you information and break every single point down into it's dumbest form for you to understand...
It's not a debate you just have cheap tactics that have from labeling people that disagree with you racist ect
switching up the discussion (ie your tenant farmer/ ruc attempts)
qouting stuff out of context ,
making stuff up (me calling tenant farmers lazy) and so on to muddy the water because you were losing badly.
But to sum it up no one agrees with you multiple people think your points are laughable,
you are incredibly biased on every point and unwilling to be wrong, I've destroyed all of your points throughout the discussion there's no need to go over the exact points again. There's little else for me to talk to you about as you just get more and more ridiculous. Your getting boring now tbh .
Cupatae wrote: » You're right but you aren't dealing with rational logical people , when it comes to this movement..
Foxtrol wrote: » NYC spends $11 billion on police, while the rate they spend on schools and programs for kids have been slashed (cutting 32% from The Department of Youth and Community Development). Plenty of evidence how investing in kids staying out of trouble is money better spent than an army on the street. I labelled tactics of tarring a race of people a being lazier than others and spamming random videos of violence from one race as giving off a racist vibe. No one has yet explained how those tactics aren't. Are comparison is not 'switching up the discussion'. It is challenging you to explain your hypocrisy and you've failed every time. I just quoted your full posts that you claimed I selectively quoted and they did nothing for you point, just more gibberish. No, you implied the black community was lazy for not being to pull themselves out of poverty and I asked you whether you'd say the same thing about tenant farmers. As usual you don't seem capable of dealing with a comparison. I'll admit you have the backing of the poster spamming videos, the posters getting offended and paranoid about what random twitter accounts, the poster that admitted they were annoyed about imagined scenarios, the posters that have said the black community are lazy, the posters that disappear when you point out how wrong their facts are, the poster that jumps to the conclusion that they are being called racist :rolleyes: You keep saying you 'destroyed' my points but are incapable of pointing me to where this happened. Keep telling yourself whatever makes you happy. I thought you were done.
Cupatae wrote: » No matter what way you spin it I'm never going to buy into your Robin hood ideology of "Defund the police give the money to the black community !" And hey presto! Equality!
We ve already been over this you ve already brought up the nypd I've already replied your repeating yourself now. Im implying the black community is lazy ? Jesus news to me! Oh wait you made that up like most of your points,
Cupatae wrote: » Now if he sits there and whinges how he started behind the 8 ball well them that's on him but the main point is the opportunity is there , the work is there. It's down to the individual, all those lads that chose crime in the us could have easily choose to get a job and graft but they took the easy way out.
Your the biggest BLM cheer leader on here utterly biased . It's disgusting tbh you cry out for equality and fairness but want all cops punished..
you only care about black poverty never a mention of white poverty because it doesn't drive ur biased narrative.
So everyone that disagrees with you are paranoid racists that call the black community lazy ? Weren't you only on about slander a few posts ago and then you bring up hypocrisy... You could nt make this stuff up ! Oh wait maybe you could actually ! Your beaten and embarrassing yourself now.
If you ve anything other than bickering to say to me feel free to pm me your just clogging the thread with nonsense now. Give it a rest.
Foxtrol wrote: » That is nonsense, defunding doesnt go into any specific community, it goes into public services that helps everyone. Are there two people posting on your account? This was your mindset earlier that people could easily get out of poverty if they bothered to 'graft'. You claim I'm making things up when you come out with more of this nonsense. No where have I said to punish all cops. Happy for anyone to correct me. Why would I mention white poverty in a BLM thread? It is like moaning that they aren't talking about soccer in a rugby thread. BTW the changes that the protesters are asking for will help white people that find themselves in poverty. I pointed out to you that slander needs to be a false statement, each of those comments were made by those that agree with you in the last 48 hours. I'll post where I want under the boards rules. If you want to PM me then go ahead.
Foxtrol wrote: » NYC spends $11 billion on police, while the rate they spend on schools and programs for kids have been slashed ...... Plenty of evidence how investing in kids staying out of trouble is money better spent than an army on the street. .
1800_Ladladlad wrote: » It was only a matter of time. Will we get back-dated apologies toohttps://twitter.com/mikehenrybro/status/1276631712949317639
Quantum Erasure wrote: » Who's going to play the talking dog....?
1800_Ladladlad wrote: » Ex MET Detective Chief Superintendent Kevin Hurley gives some very uncomfortable truths during Sky news interview today following the Brixton police attacks, which so sky news cut him off. They did this a SN reporter with the reading attack last week.https://twitter.com/Miss_Snuffy/status/1276408045845831681
Quantum Erasure wrote: » Should do like they did with Smithers in the first season, just change him from black to 'white'....
oyvey wrote: » Also Smithers is heavily implied to be gay, if not outright stated. So it would have to be a gay black man to voice Smithers back then.
Cupatae wrote: » I assume this will work both ways, no more black people to be given white roles, like "James bond , the witcher" Black people or "coloured" can now only act in jobs that were specifically race stated in an attempt to end racism If it wasn't all so stupid it d nearly be funny.
