Foxtrol wrote: » It is more like they're shouting 'my house is on fire' and there are a mix of people saying 'what about all houses' and 'well I don't believe you because of xyz', you seem to fall into the latter group. But you've ignored the multiple studies posted here and continue to cling to ones with incredibly shoddy data. And local police departments collect the data for those studies. In many (I believe a majority) of places police are not required to capture any/all data points and no audit is carried out. Pushing for systematic data gathering on use of force is one of the demands of protesters. They had an outsized impact because that is what gets clicks/viewers. Multiple large protests have taken in many cities every day since the murder of George Floyd and they fell completely off the national/international news. It highlights how poor the data is regarding police shootings. Given how it has been proven over the last few weeks that police officers have lied about incidents, despite knowing there was video evidence, how do you keep holding the belief that a) the data they have collected is accurate and/or b) that the missing data is not selectively left out (e.g., not filling out the race when POC are the deceased)? As above From what I've seen, you haven't once made any broader argument that there isn't systematic racism in the US. What you've instead done is find one flawed data point and hid behind it to prove they don't have a point. I've haven't seen you deal with the impact of slavery, segregation, education, wider policing issues, the bail system, etc etc. You're claiming that you are being gaslit but I don't see any evidence you've actually done anything to understand why they're saying that their house is on fire.
Still waters wrote: » Is that not racist also Also i saw their goalie publicly condemn the banner, what a tool
tayto lover wrote: » Saw a statistic that the police in the US have killed far more whites than blacks. If this is so then how is it wrong to say that all lives matter?
Rodney Bathgate wrote: » Read the opening post - you have been told it is racist by a boards moderator. Is that not enough for you?
ExMachina1000 wrote: » White lives do matter. To say different makes you a racist
1800_Ladladlad wrote: » A deputy from Harris County Sheriff’s Office, Ellison Collins, invited a 61 y/o man to slap him in the face, the cop returned the slap with enough force to knock the older man to the ground, busting his head. Collins body cam was not on but the body cam of another officer’s got it all on camera. Hash tag white privilege https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eWa0b-l-K3Y
Hunky Monster wrote: » Let’s say ONE of those players didn’t agree with these BLM protests. Let’s face it there probably is one. But the repercussions for that player should he not kneel or wear that jersey would be career suicide. The BLM movement is a leaderless mob of goons with no clear objective and they would absolutely destroy that player. His life would be over. And yet people continue to support it. It’s gotten to a point where you can’t disagree with it in any shape or form and not be labelled a racist/Nazi. Conversation is over. Debate is shut down. Agree or you’re against black people. If you don’t agree we will end your life. Sound lads really.
1800_Ladladlad wrote: » Bubba Smollett. After his melodramatic display of victimhood stating he found a noose in his pit area. All of the sh*t he has caused, not only in the nascar community, there should be a punishment in place. He sure benefited from it. This was nothing more than a political, publicity stunt that he milked. Looking back on the grandiose display of virtue signaling just shows how pathetic and comicle the US is when it comes to this to stuff. React emotionally first. The demand for racism far outweighs the supply of racism.https://twitter.com/NASCAR/status/1275542920972689409
Overheal wrote: » Well you know many folks here would argue the man who got arrested is solely responsible for what happened to him and got what he deserved.
Hunky Monster wrote: » Who would argue that. Let’s wait and see.
Overheal wrote: » The same type of people who pretend that Rayshard Brooks got what he deserved and was the only one responsible for what happened to him. All the same logic applies here.
Hunky Monster wrote: » You’re lost. Absolutely lost. Logic means nothing to you. I’d hate to live in the world you think you live in.
Overheal wrote: » All spittle and no cohesive counter argument? Quelle surprise
Foxtrol wrote: » It is more like they're shouting 'my house is on fire' and there are a mix of people saying 'what about all houses' and 'well I don't believe you because of xyz', you seem to fall into the latter group.
Foxtrol wrote: » But you've ignored the multiple studies posted here and continue to cling to ones with incredibly shoddy data.
Foxtrol wrote: » And local police departments collect the data for those studies. In many (I believe a majority) of places police are not required to capture any/all data points and no audit is carried out. Pushing for systematic data gathering on use of force is one of the demands of protesters.
Foxtrol wrote: » They had an outsized impact because that is what gets clicks/viewers. Multiple large protests have taken in many cities every day since the murder of George Floyd and they fell completely off the national/international news.
Foxtrol wrote: » It highlights how poor the data is regarding police shootings. Given how it has been proven over the last few weeks that police officers have lied about incidents, despite knowing there was video evidence, how do you keep holding the belief that a) the data they have collected is accurate and/or b) that the missing data is not selectively left out (e.g., not filling out the race when POC are the deceased)?
Foxtrol wrote: » From what I've seen, you haven't once made any broader argument that there isn't systematic racism in the US.
Foxtrol wrote: » What you've instead done is find one flawed data point and hid behind it to prove they don't have a point.
Foxtrol wrote: » I've haven't seen you deal with the impact of slavery, segregation, education, wider policing issues, the bail system, etc etc.
Foxtrol wrote: » You're claiming that you are being gaslit but I don't see any evidence you've actually done anything to understand why they're saying that their house is on fire.
Golf is my Game wrote: » There clearly lots in the world who think the blacks are worth less and their as entitled to their point of view as anyone else
1800_Ladladlad wrote: You'd argue that the 9/11 hijackers were practicing their 1st amendment rite.
Hunky Monster wrote: » Conversation is over. Debate is shut down. .