Cycling on paths and other cycling issues (updated title)

SeanW wrote: »

Correct. In 2018 Ireland suffered 149 road fatalities. That was among the lowest in the world by every relative measure. If you are in Ireland, you have an approximately 99.99625% of surviving us motorists every year.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_traffic-related_death_rate

It's also near the lowest in Irish history, figures in the 100-200 range have not been seen since the 1940s.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_road_traffic_accidents_deaths_in_Republic_of_Ireland_by_year

Irish drivers are not terrible. That's an indisputable fact. That doesn't stop sanctimonious two-wheeled hypocrites from hijacking every discussion with: bUt mOtOrIsTs aRe kIlLiNg eVeRyBoDy

I never said Irish drivers are terrible?

Those 149 who died. I'm sure their families are happy to know they died on some of the safest roads in the world.

meeeeh wrote: »

They are bit lower now. However if you ever cycle around Ljubljana I can guarantee you will be sitting at the traffic lights waiting for them to turn green as will everyone else. If you make a traffic offence as a cyclist there is a lot more likely you will be fined or warned (you are supposed to carry an ID). There is a good chance you will be breathalyzed if they think you are cycling erratically and so on. My point is that with more people cycling comes better infrastructure but also better road behavior expected by cyclists. Yet here the response to anything is but drivers, but potholes, but it's hard to stop at the lights and so on... It's all about the infrastructure and nothing about the behavior.

IMO good cycling behaviour and good cycling infrastructure go hand in hand. But getting good cycling infrastructure should not be dependent on good cyclist behaviour. If we applied the same to motorists, we wouldn't have any Motorways etc.

meeeeh

07Lapierre wrote: »

IMO good cycling behaviour and good cycling infrastructure go hand in hand. But getting good cycling infrastructure should not be dependent on good cyclist behaviour. If we applied the same to motorists, we wouldn't have any Motorways etc.

I grew up in the country. Enforcement was always quite strict (we had to carry cycling licence as kids) and infrastructure wasn't always there. Enforcement is probably more due to larger volume of traffic and larger numbers of people cycling and not because infrastructure is that great. (BTW There is not much fuss about hi viz as far as I know but helmets are mandatory for kids.) Driving culture is worse there than here. Speeding only improved in last decade or so and drink driving (and drink cycling) is still a problem.

07Lapierre wrote: »

I never said Irish drivers are terrible?

Those 149 who died. I'm sure their families are happy to know they died on some of the safest roads in the world.

You might not have said Irish drivers are terrible, but taking a dump on Irish motorists has been basically the theme of this thread.

As to the stats being cold comfort to bereaved families, there's some truth to that. It doesn't change the facts however.

SeanW wrote: »

You might not have said Irish drivers are terrible, but taking a dump on Irish motorists has been basically the theme of this thread.

How have you still not realised that most, if not all, of us strong, sexy and extremely fit and handsome cyclists are also motorists?

And yet you all post like some horrible evil motorist stole your lunch money and locked you in the closet when you were a kid.

While deflecting from any discussion about cyclists on footpaths or sailing through red lights. Go figure.

SeanW wrote: »

And yet you all post like some horrible evil motorist stole your lunch money and locked you in the closet when you were a kid.

Amongst us aesthetically pleasing card carrying members of the cycling lobby, we know those type of people as an ugly, physically and mentally for the horrible things they do.

No idea what that even means. But hey, if it distracts from lawbreaking cyclists breaking red lights and menacing pedestrians on the footpaths, go for it :rolleyes:

Stark

SeanW wrote: »

You might not have said Irish drivers are terrible, but taking a dump on Irish motorists has been basically the theme of this thread.

"Oh noes. People keep interrupting my taking a dump on Irish cyclists thread to take a dump on Irish motorists" :rolleyes:

Remind me again who started this thread and what were the contents of the OP? Did the OP mention motorists?

As to taking a dump on Irish cyclists, it's just remind the hypocrites like Andy that they're in no position to call other people names.

SeanW wrote: »

You might not have said Irish drivers are terrible, but taking a dump on Irish motorists has been basically the theme of this thread.

As to the stats being cold comfort to bereaved families, there's some truth to that. It doesn't change the facts however.

You definitely hate cyclists. Nobody has defended cyclists who cycle on the pavement! It's wrong, it's illegal and it clearly annoys people ( especially you)

Tell me, the 149 people killed on our roads last year, how many of them would still be alive today if there were no cyclists on our roads?

Well, if that 149 had been in another country, they would been 200+. But what gets me about Andy and his circlejerk (and to be clear, I'm not including you in this per-se) is the hypocrisy. "No no, let's not talk about cyclist misbheaviour 98% OF MOTORISTS ARE LAWBREAKING SCUM!! WE NEED MASSIVE AMOUNTS OF OBSCENE OVERREGULATION ON MOTORISTS BECAUSE THEY'RE KILLING EVERYBODY!!"

When you see this as a response to any criticism of cyclist lawbreaking, you have to wonder if there's not some kind of deflection going on.

FinnC

07Lapierre wrote: »

Nobody has defended cyclists who cycle on the pavement! It's wrong, it's illegal and it clearly annoys people ( especially you)

In fairness plenty on here have defended it and tried to justify it! Dont ask me for names of who as I have no idea of anyones usernames as I don't look at them.

SeanW wrote: »

Well, if that 149 had been in another country, they would been 200+. But what gets me about Andy and his circlejerk (and to be clear, I'm not including you in this per-se) is the hypocrisy. "No no, let's not talk about cyclist misbheaviour 98% OF MOTORISTS ARE LAWBREAKING SCUM!! WE NEED MASSIVE AMOUNTS OF OBSCENE OVERREGULATION ON MOTORISTS BECAUSE THEY'RE KILLING EVERYBODY!!"

When you see this as a response to any criticism of cyclist lawbreaking, you have to wonder if there's not some kind of deflection going on.

There is no comparison between cyclists lawbreaking and motorists lawbreaking. They are chalk and cheese. IMO the only deflection is motorists trying to defend their driving by trying to blame other road users for their own deaths.

Sean seems to be getting pretty stressed about this. A relaxing cycle would help him unwind.

It seems your side should go for a nice long cycle to unwind. It took Little Andy only 6 minutes to jump down a pedestrians throat with "BUT LOOK AT MOTORISTS" not long ago.

07Lapierre wrote: »

There is no comparison between cyclists lawbreaking and motorists lawbreaking. They are chalk and cheese. IMO the only deflection is motorists trying to defend their driving by trying to blame other road users for their own deaths.

Nobody's trying to blame cyclists for road deaths. Nevertheless, Irish drivers are generally not dangerous. The data on that is clear.

But there is a lot of deflection ...

FinnC wrote: »

In fairness plenty on here have defended it and tried to justify it! Dont ask me for names of who as I have no idea of anyones usernames as I don't look at them.

Defended it or explained it? Cycling on the pavement is illegal but I understand why some people do it. I've no issue with kids, the elderly or anyone who is nervous cycling in traffic using the pavement.

Have you looked at the type of bike lanes we have in this country? Some are on the pavement, some are just painted lanes on the road. Some are a mix of the two. Some are one way, some are contra flow etc. Etc. It's a mess out there!

A lot of people have nothing but bad experiences when cycling on the road! Close passes, verbal abuse etc. ... no wonder people cycle on the pavement.

SeanW wrote: »

It seems your side should go for a nice long cycle to unwind.

I'll propose it to our lobby's event planning department.

SeanW wrote: »

But there is a lot of deflection ...

Yep... Road tax, hi viz, helmets, no plates for bikes, a test for cyclists etc. Etc.

micar

Hurrache wrote: »

Sean seems to be getting pretty stressed about this. A relaxing cycle would help him unwind.

Nothing worse that some using capital letters to make a point........shouty, shouty, shouty

Remind me again, what was the OP? And how did it go from a pedestrian complaining about lawbreaking cyclists to: BuT MoToRiStS BrEaK MuH SpEeD LiMiTs?

monument

SeanW wrote: »

Remind me again who started this thread and what were the contents of the OP? Did the OP mention motorists?

As to taking a dump on Irish cyclists, it's just remind the hypocrites like Andy that they're in no position to call other people names.

The thread has moved on (by posters of different views) and the topic has been updated. If you cannot accept that, please don't post again.

-- moderator

SeanW wrote: »

And yet you all post like some horrible evil motorist stole your lunch money and locked you in the closet when you were a kid.

While deflecting from any discussion about cyclists on footpaths or sailing through red lights. Go figure.

Red means STOP. End of discussion. The Gardai are responsible for law enforcement or is that a deflection?

meeeeh wrote: »

I grew up in the country. Enforcement was always quite strict (we had to carry cycling licence as kids) and infrastructure wasn't always there. Enforcement is probably more due to larger volume of traffic and larger numbers of people cycling and not because infrastructure is that great. (BTW There is not much fuss about hi viz as far as I know but helmets are mandatory for kids.) Driving culture is worse there than here. Speeding only improved in last decade or so and drink driving (and drink cycling) is still a problem.

Law enforcement is usually down to resources. When resources are limited, then enforcement concentrates on the more serious infringements.

Our judicial system also makes enforcement of minor infringements tedious, heavy on administration and time consuming. There's very little incentive for Gardai to enforce ROTR for cyclists.

TaurenDruid

07Lapierre wrote: »

You definitely hate cyclists. Nobody has defended cyclists who cycle on the pavement! It's wrong, it's illegal and it clearly annoys people ( especially you)

Tell me, the 149 people killed on our roads last year, how many of them would still be alive today if there were no cyclists on our roads?

Nah, they literally have. On several occasions.

Zebra3

SeanW wrote: »

Nobody's trying to blame cyclists for road deaths. Nevertheless, Irish drivers are generally not dangerous. The data on that is clear.

But there is a lot of deflection ...

Here we go again.

Every time I go out cycling, I'm passed dangerously by motorists who take chances with my life to save themselves less than a minute.

None of these incidents ever show up in your data.

And even though it happens every time I'm cycling, you come on here constantly lying about motorists. Even though it's proven (in data!) about how they break the law while driving.

Some bubble you live in.