JimmyVik wrote: » How many are there now?
Augeo wrote: » Ah yes, indeed. There were 1300 for rent in Dublin in late March ............. 1900 now.
Billythekid19 wrote: » Theres currently 1900 properties listed on daft to rent in Dublin. Not a big shock really half the county have moved home for covid, you cant justify playing 1000 euro + a month for a room when your employer / college is allowing you to wfh.
JimmyVik wrote: » I remember Halifaxs 5% interest current account.
coolshannagh28 wrote: It is a labour intensive industry making a huge contribution to the state and employing 250000 people who are on social welfare at the moment which the government cant afford. If the industry cant remain viable when it reopens it will put a huge strain of the economy as unemployment and insolvency soars with trigger effects on the wider economy . This is the sector of the economy which will determine if Covid 19 is a passing issue or becomes a crisis .
Hubertj wrote: do you really think the only issue with the restaurant industry are rents? Way more complicated than that - there are too many restaurants in urban areas, poor management, poor service, poor quality food, insurance, rents and so on and so on
19233974 wrote: » Wow didnt realise it was such an increase, no wonder the prices are dropping
SozBbz wrote: » Just checked my postbox and got 2 leaflets from mainstream Estate Agents along the lines of "properties like yours urgently required". Seems to corroborate my assumption that 2nd hand stock coming to the market would rapidly dry up.
OwlsZat wrote: » The restaurants and apartments are the same total oversupply given the new norm. Many companies won't bother renting office space where they have established they dont need it. Theres going to be a changing of the guard in the city. Many won't be back. This is why the talk of propping up all restaurants until 2021 must end. A good number of these will have to close as their customers migrate to pastures new.
OwlsZat wrote: » Many people will hold off making big lifestyle changes like selling the family home until they can see what their employer is planning for the future. The volume of sales fell off a cliff in May. Can't see it picking up until more job losses or certainty appear in the labour market.https://bl.ocks.org/pinsterdev/raw/98d5baa18a1bc6d603e0/
SozBbz wrote: » I think they restaurants need *some* support, but obviously not everything they're asking for. That way, the good ones should be able to survive with a combination of some support and some custom as it comes back. Those who can't get that custom will go to the wall, as is normal in the restaurant industry. I do think we need to be careful about what happens to our city centers post covid. I'd hate to see the city become a ghost town and everything revolving around the suburbs. We need to make our city centers civic spaces with cultural attractions and not just revolving around office and retail space.
wassie wrote: » Agents need volume (i.e. turnover) in order to make money. Commission on sales is not large enough to incentivize holding on to a property for a higher price.
The_Conductor wrote: » Why should restaurants get support- but not other service sector industries (or indeed, the shell-shocked public who have been locked away for the past 12-13 weeks). If we do have a migration away from the city centre (which will be welcomed as they've made it so damn difficult to actually get in there anyway)- of course restaurants (and every other service sector company) is going to encounter difficulties. However, these existential threats- are accompanied by commensurate opportunities elsewhere- cafés and restaurants that are getting hammered with high rents in the city centre may find that opening new outlets in the suburbs, where their operating costs are lower, might, even with lower turnover, be more financially viable (not to mention rewarding for all those staff who are going to be working from home for the foreseeable future- many until the end of the year, or even longer). Why should one particular sector get special treatment- over and above the needs of a great many other sectors? What about all those working in filling stations- many of which may close down- if there is a seachange in transport and commuting and people choose to work from home long term? Or bookshops in the city centre. Or all the clothes shops? Or the private clinics of a great many medical and dental practitioners that are in the city centre- or any of a long and meandering list of other people. Lots of businesses in the city centre were hurting badly- before Covid came along at all- some, such as the restaurant trade- managed to reinvent themselves early on- and opened up sidelines in doing high-end take-away and other services. Many didn't. Many didn't have any such opportunities- think of all the small local owned businesses out there. I just fail to see why one sector deserves to be mollycoddled to the exclusion of everyone else..........
SozBbz wrote: » ................... ICE vehicles will become obsolete. Eating out will not. ..............
Augeo wrote: » So prop up all restaurants until we no longer need to social distance? Prop up city centre eateries that have less customers due to WFH etc? For how long? Do the same for all pubs?
SozBbz wrote: » Again, why such absolutes? Why can't people actually read my posts and stop inferring things I categorically did not say. I said good, viable restaurants. I did not say to prop up all restaurants. I actually said that its normal for a certain amount of restaurants to not survive purely because they're just not good enough at the best of times, and as usual, these businesses should be allowed fail.
Assetbacked wrote: » At the same time, social distancing nonsense cannot be required in order for these places to reopen while at the same time supports are withdrawn. It is not fair to tell a business "we're withdrawing supports to you as you can reopen but you need to ensure only a small no. of people are on the premise at any one time". If social distancing is required for another 6 months then the government absolutely must underwrite all businesses in the State.
combat14 wrote: » No the country cant afford to borrow more money to waste another 1.8bn propping up non viable businesses it is effectively only pouring money into grossly over priced commercial landlord hands
AdamD wrote: » The government can't afford for our hospitalilty sector to collapse either
Assetbacked wrote: If social distancing is required for another 6 months then the government absolutely must underwrite all businesses in the State.