jam_mac_jam wrote: » Yep, fairly disgusting alright. With this and the stabbing thread Boards is a real eye opener this evening.
Nozebleed wrote: » attention seeker. wouldn't believe a word of it. this entire generation seems to have a fantasy of being touched up. if she posts a picture of herself and she's a ride it might change my mind! i doubt it tho..just another attention seeking pig.
KiKi III wrote: » What if there is no proof? Hypothetical: Let’s say I was raped a year ago and only able to come forward now due to the trauma. There is no physical evidence now. No proof, as such. But in this hypothetical scenario the rape absolutely definitely happened. You want proof but there isn’t any. It’s my word against his. Should I be allowed to speak out? Name my rapist to the Gardaí? To my own friends? Or do I have to put up and shut up forever because I didn’t have the strength to report there and then?
The Mighty Quinn wrote: » Wow. Horrifying thought process and attitude on display. One of the most overtly vitriolic posts I've read in a while.
Kermit.de.frog wrote: » So according to the OP we are suppose to automatically believe a randomer on Twitter with no details, no proof?
Nozebleed wrote: » funny i was thinking that exact same thing about the woman who posted this allegation on twitter. i dont believe a word of it..and no attempt by you to publically shame me for that opinion will change that fact. its fabricated lies..pure and simple. highlights all thats wrong with social media and twitter in particular. ive seen enough false allegations made against men over the last few years. we all know what the agenda is at this stage...
coinop wrote: » Another interesting tidbit further down the thread.https://twitter.com/bouldirishmammy/status/1274775988539461632
El_Duderino 09 wrote: » This is precisely as dopey as automatically believing the allegation. Without evidence the only thing that can lead to the conclusion, is bias and prejudice.
Nozebleed wrote: » without evidence...you said it yourself. its hear say. you've have no reason to believe it. but you want to believe it. you are actually trying to convince yourself and others that it happened. without any actual evidence.:rolleyes: when are people gona wake up to this kind of thing? women lie. this is simply one of those cases..in my opinon.
Gruffalox wrote: » To just randomly post insinuating allegations years later seems like the least effective and most immature thing to do.
the_syco wrote: » The timing makes the vague accusation sound like a targeted strike against the new government.
El_Duderino 09 wrote: » Can you point to one thing I said that shows I either want to believe it or trying to convince myself or others that it happened? Otherwise kindly apologise
Wibbs wrote: » I don't believe anyone without proof and a tweet doesn't cut it. That's why we invented laws and courts of law. Anything else is mob rule.
Guy:Incognito wrote: » Does this apply to the women in your life? If one comes home and says some lad stuck his hand up her skirt but the only evidence is her word, you'll just dismiss her?
jimwallace197 wrote: » Get up the yard with your nonsense, so traumatized that you couldn't report it for a year. And you are an adult female in these metoo times. .
ChikiChiki wrote: » I think distressed disclosure to one person that you know and trust is a very different scenario to just throwing something out there to the mob and letting them cast their own aspersions on a relatively small grouping of people.
Eric Cartman wrote: » wouldn't shock me in the slightest, sure we saw the Joe loughnanne stuff that came out, its always the same types who cry the loudest about it to hide their own sins. Anyone wringing their hands thinking its a FF/FG politician is most likely wrong.
olestoepoke wrote: » Shocking if true, what's even more shocking is the amount of replies saying 100% believe you and #believe you etc. Scary to think we live in a society where people blindly believe anything that's tweeted.
Guy:Incognito wrote: » Without anything, you have the believability down at 10% but as soon as theres a sniff it could be someone "on the left" youre ready to start believing certain people could well be guilty.
Chris_Heilong wrote: » Twitter is a dangerous tool and should not be used for such things. Law of the land and the police should be the first step.
Previously, she worked in Communications nad advocacy for NGOs and political parties in Ireland, including Pavee Point Traveller and Roma Centre, Nasc, the Irish Immigration Support Service and the Labour Party.
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://w2.vanillicon.com/v2/212d22e3488068a276fa24b715b3ceaa.svg)
