Guy:Incognito wrote: » Does this apply to the women in your life? If one comes home and says some lad stuck his hand up her skirt but the only evidence is her word, you'll just dismiss her?
Wibbs wrote: » I don't believe anyone without proof and a tweet doesn't cut it. That's why we invented laws and courts of law. Anything else is mob rule.
El_Duderino 09 wrote: » Can you point to one thing I said that shows I either want to believe it or trying to convince myself or others that it happened? Otherwise kindly apologise
the_syco wrote: » The timing makes the vague accusation sound like a targeted strike against the new government.
Gruffalox wrote: » To just randomly post insinuating allegations years later seems like the least effective and most immature thing to do.
Nozebleed wrote: » without evidence...you said it yourself. its hear say. you've have no reason to believe it. but you want to believe it. you are actually trying to convince yourself and others that it happened. without any actual evidence.:rolleyes: when are people gona wake up to this kind of thing? women lie. this is simply one of those cases..in my opinon.
El_Duderino 09 wrote: » This is precisely as dopey as automatically believing the allegation. Without evidence the only thing that can lead to the conclusion, is bias and prejudice.
Nozebleed wrote: » funny i was thinking that exact same thing about the woman who posted this allegation on twitter. i dont believe a word of it..and no attempt by you to publically shame me for that opinion will change that fact. its fabricated lies..pure and simple. highlights all thats wrong with social media and twitter in particular. ive seen enough false allegations made against men over the last few years. we all know what the agenda is at this stage...
coinop wrote: » Another interesting tidbit further down the thread.https://twitter.com/bouldirishmammy/status/1274775988539461632
Kermit.de.frog wrote: » So according to the OP we are suppose to automatically believe a randomer on Twitter with no details, no proof?
The Mighty Quinn wrote: » Wow. Horrifying thought process and attitude on display. One of the most overtly vitriolic posts I've read in a while.
KiKi III wrote: » What if there is no proof? Hypothetical: Let’s say I was raped a year ago and only able to come forward now due to the trauma. There is no physical evidence now. No proof, as such. But in this hypothetical scenario the rape absolutely definitely happened. You want proof but there isn’t any. It’s my word against his. Should I be allowed to speak out? Name my rapist to the Gardaí? To my own friends? Or do I have to put up and shut up forever because I didn’t have the strength to report there and then?
Nozebleed wrote: » attention seeker. wouldn't believe a word of it. this entire generation seems to have a fantasy of being touched up. if she posts a picture of herself and she's a ride it might change my mind! i doubt it tho..just another attention seeking pig.
jam_mac_jam wrote: » Yep, fairly disgusting alright. With this and the stabbing thread Boards is a real eye opener this evening.
Galwayguy35 wrote: » So you would want more proof? But there isn't any unless you know something the rest of us don't.
Joeytheparrot wrote: » I believe her
LawBoy2018 wrote: » This post genuinely turned my stomach. You are disgusting and I sincerely hope you don't have a daughter.
Joeytheparrot wrote: » Yes. Thats why I believe her.
Nozebleed wrote: » is the letter D in the name?
Beechwoodspark wrote: » Afaik that case is ongoing...
osarusan wrote: » Yes, we should evaluate claims of sexual assault based on the attractiveness of the person claiming. What a moronic post.
Galwayguy35 wrote: » Would you not want more proof than a random tweet to decide if you believe someone or not?