sid waddell wrote: » BBC have portrayed Michael Collins as a black lesbian transsexual? Really?
Tim Lizzy wrote: » Hey, I get laid. It ain't no big deal.
KiKi III wrote: » And (s)he’s FABULOUS.
FVP3 wrote: » Since most of us are Americans or Anglos, none of us really have whiteness.
sid waddell wrote: » This is an Irish forum.
I'm not sure where you're getting the impression that "most of us are Americans or "Anglos"".
FVP3 wrote: » Yes, although given your posting history and your use of language you don't seem to fully realise that.
Tim Lizzy wrote: » Ugh. You're the kind of twat that shows up to a match with a Palestinian flag, aren't you?
"Nation will rise against nation {and internally, ethnos against ethnos}, kingdom against kingdom."
sid waddell wrote: » Insane far right ideology is the problem, it's always the problem.
Emiliano Better Chemist wrote: » Perfect example illustrated above^, it's always the 'other side', their own side bears zero responsibility for actions, and thus reactions of such actions.
sid waddell wrote: » Hilarious to see people bring up the problems in the US, the EU, India. Insane far right ideology is the problem, it's always the problem. Far right ideologists warning about the problems their own ideology causes is a special level of stupid.
Madeleine Birchfield wrote: » Yep and those people are in charge of the DUP and Northern Ireland had no government for over 3 years thanks to the DUP Ulster Unionist extremists. Some of them have even threatened terrorism if Ireland ever gets reunited.
sid waddell wrote: » "Black people need to take responsibility for being black"
Emiliano Better Chemist wrote: » Very strange comment.
"brothers should pull up their pants"
Emiliano Better Chemist wrote: » Has there been a worse time than this, when so many rise against each other? Not just nation states, but actual sub-communities, nations/ideologies with cities, peer groups, gangs, persuasions, even the previous projected perfect type families. Maybe it's the pestilance of COVID: divorces are rising, domestic voilence is up, even such royal kingdoms are at war within themselves. e.g Me-gain wan has a new book out, blaming Will for brother trouble, which in turn will lead to counter acusations, and so on.
Emiliano Better Chemist wrote: Very strange comment.
sid waddell wrote: » Yes, open a history book, a school one will do
sid waddell wrote: » I don't think the Royal family is at war with each other, though it's interesting how you singled out Megan
[Deleted User] wrote: » Was close friends with this guy for years and years and he was a fairly typical American who had crass enough views on the world. I don't mean that is typical of an American; I mean he was just very American. Bit by bit with this new group of people him and his girlfriend got into, they turned into the cliche we all know. They were suddenly so extreme left wing, I got shifted from a lifetime of having very left social views to being rightwing in their eyes because you're with us or against us. On numerous occasions while I was having meals with their friends, I was just taken aback at the sheer and utter fakeness of the front they were all displaying. I know this guy. I know his views long held. He cannot have switched all of them legimately to miraculously conform to what this group all "believed" so quickly and definitively. He seems to have fallen back to more reasonable views lately and we've met a couple of times. When he does give his opinion on something, it comes across as his own again.
no.8 wrote: » Best to omit extremes from either end of the spectrum, and that poster is case in point. All that serves to do (imho) is push moderates further away from his/her extremist views and attempts to quash freedom of speech
sid waddell wrote: » In the real world, my views as stated here are the very definition of moderation - nuanced, sensible, reasonable. I'm in alignment with the vast majority of Irish people.The views of the OP and several other posters on this thread are wacko insanity and worthy of nothing other than ridicule and dismissal, because they are the product of a zero real life experience other than toiling behind a keyboard all day, which unsurprisingly leads to paranoid fantasies of fake oppression. There is no acceptable middle ground between a society which does not discriminate against people based on their ethnicity or gender or sexuality, and far right insanity as voiced by the OP and other bigoted posters - that would be just halfway insane, which is still insane. I wonder whether back in the 1980s were we afflicted with people calling for a "sensible halfway house" between freedom and apartheid in South Africa, "an acceptable level of apartheid" in other words. Well, if the internet had existed, we sure would have been. A quick read of this thread tells which posters would have been in the vanguard - because they're right there now.
WhiteMemento9 wrote: » Quite interesting to see the option of a polar opinion rather than a nuanced one is the leading answer in the poll. I really do dispair for humanity.
sid waddell wrote: » In the real world, my views as stated here are the very definition of moderation - nuanced, sensible, reasonable. I'm in alignment with the vast majority of Irish people. The views of the OP and several other posters on this thread are wacko insanity and worthy of nothing other than ridicule and dismissal, because they are the product of a zero real life experience other than toiling behind a keyboard all day, which unsurprisingly leads to paranoid fantasies of fake oppression. There is no acceptable middle ground between a society which does not discriminate against people based on their ethnicity or gender or sexuality, and far right insanity as voiced by the OP and other bigoted posters - that would be just halfway insane, which is still insane. I wonder whether back in the 1980s were we afflicted with people calling for a "sensible halfway house" between freedom and apartheid in South Africa, "an acceptable level of apartheid" in other words. Well, if the internet had existed, we sure would have been. A quick read of this thread tells which posters would have been in the vanguard - because they're right there now.
Chris_Heilong wrote: » Post modern progressiveness. 'Current day Progressivism' is fueled by Identitarianism ...no it isn't. Broadly speaking, 'Progressivism' is fueled by social inequality/inequity and the need to correct it. Inequality itself can be informed by 'Identitarianism' but it isn't the fuel of progressivism. To claim otherwise is absurd and makes me think you don't know what that word actually means (or that you do know what it means and you're pushing an agenda) Many have been indoctrinated into this way of thinking in University and are now in positions of influence and power where they can spread their way of thinking.this is just concern-trolling anti-intellectual populist nonsense. Maybe, just maybe, educated people know what they are talking about. It is a crazy thought, i know, but try it out for a while If you have heard words like white privilege, cis, reverse racism or even unconscious bias then they all come from this ideology.unconscious bias is a fact, in so far as any notion in psychology can be 'proven'. If you have research that can explain the reams of evidence that supports unconscious bias, then you should publish a paper and expect a well paid job in return for debunking a widely accepted notion in the fields of psychology, behavioural science, cognitive science and cognitive linguistics People getting fired for having an opinion is almost hard to believe if we have not become so numb to it as it has happened so many times recently.of course people should be fired for having extremist opinions. Do you think it should be acceptable for people to fly Nazi flags at work?? I guess we'll have to agree to disagree